Paras Chopra Profile picture
Jul 25, 2020 20 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Reading this #book by @paulg.

Will keep sharing notes in this thread as I go along. Image
1/ The first chapter is on why nerds are unpopular.

The key insight: groups with a clearly well-defined adversary (sports teams, companies) form hierarchy based on ability, while groups without an external adversary (teenagers in school) form hierarchy based on who can rise more
2/ Because teenagers yet don’t have economic value, they’re kept in schools so that adults can go about their day.

In such an empty place, being popular is a full time job and has less to do with what you can do but rather your ability to do things that “popular” kids do.
3/ Nerds are more concerned about doing things and since being popular is a full time job in purposeless groups, they naturally end up becoming unpopular.

While cool kids are spending hours curating Instagram profiles, nerds are obsessing about random projects.
4/ The next chapter is about how hackers and painters are similar to each other in the sense of both being makers.

@paulg describes the hacker ethic beautifully and how calling it “computer science” discourages and confuses would-be hackers.
5/ Science is about discovering something new while hacking and painting is about creating something new.

In that sense, hacking computer programs is like tinkering. You make something and iterate on it.

Unlike science, there’s no “correct” way of painting and making things.
6/ But.. painters don’t paid much because what they’re doing is fun.

Similarly, hacking cool software is not going to make you money.

People pay you money when you solve problems for them, which usually requires a ton of grunt work.
7/ But that’s not to say you shouldn’t hack.

Like musicians, painters, writers, keep a day job to pay bills and hack your heart out during evenings and weekends.

Incidentally: reason for the rise of open source was precisely this.
8/ The crux of the chapter is that hackers shouldn’t feel guilty of not doing things “properly” or knowing theory.

They should learn from painters who often don’t have complete picture upfront, regularly change direction mid way, and don’t care much about how paints are made.
9/ The third chapter is on what we ideas we can’t say out loud.

The key idea is to notice what labels people use to suppress ideas. If they use anything other than “untrue”, you know what you’re not allowed to say.

E.g. “sexist”, “politically incorrect”, “anti-national”
10/ Why is it important to unearth ideas you can’t say aloud?

Because otherwise you’d never recognise that some of them might be true and that the only reason they’re not allowed because some group might feel threatened.
11/ E.g. Galileo’s ideas were considered “heretical”, and not untrue.

Similarly, what ideas today are considered X-ist? Play with those ideas in your head and judge their truthfulness in private comfort of your thoughts.
12/ While it may not be worth it to pick a fight with a powerful group on a true idea that you’re not supposed to say aloud, at least such recognition gives you mental clarity which otherwise you won’t have.
13/ Thought suppression by different groups happens all the time.

It will benefit you to actively try finding what you’re not allowed to say and why you’re not allowed to say that? (Most likely it’s because of fear of idea’s consequences and not because the idea is false)
14/ The next chapter is my all time favorite: how to make wealth.

In it, Paul talks about difference between wealth (stuff we want) and money (compressed storage of the stuff we want).

The way to make wealth is to build things that others care about.
15/ There are two requirements for increasing your chances of becoming wealthy: measurement and leverage.

Measurement = being able to attribute outcomes to your effort.

Leverage = potential for having an impact even while you’re sleeping
16/ Leverage typically is had with technology. It’s what you call “create once, sell infinite times”.

Artisans who work on one piece at a time don’t have any leverage while inventor of a machine that makes the same thing has a lot of leverage.
17/ Measurement is important to get wealthy because if your output is averaged with all others (like it typically happens in a big company), you don’t have incentive to work 10 times hard in order to have a chance to get paid 10 times more.
18/ Only when you’re working by yourself or in a small team of a startup, you have a shot at working harder and at difficult problems because you know you’ll get paid more

This is why big companies are slow in innovation. There are not sufficient incentives for anyone to do that
19/ Without a hope of having a real chance to make a lot of money, people will naturally work on either easy problems or interesting problems.

But a lot of money is usually made by doing work that nobody else is willing to do (because it’s hard or unsexy).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paras Chopra

Paras Chopra Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @paraschopra

Sep 14
Turing’s Dream first batch - who is in it and what they’re upto.

🧵
1/ Praveen Chavali - @praveen_chavali is exploring the math of neural networks, and is trying to build a black box optimization method for compressing large models into smaller models.

At yesterday’s tech deep dive, he showed why GANs never converge.
@praveen_chavali 2/ Mehul Goyal - @observerforever is a former hedge fund guy who is now exploring how to model time series data using deep networks.

Yesterday, he explained the problem formulation of predicting sharpe ratio via a reinforcement learning kind of a setup. Image
Read 12 tweets
May 15
How to be a messy thinker

🧵
1/ I love thinking about thinking. Give me a research paper on rationality, cognitive biases or mental models, and I’ll gobble it up.

Given the amount of knowledge I’ve ingested on these topics, I had always assumed that I’m a clear thinker.
2/ Recently, though, it hit me like a lightning strike that this belief is counter-productive.

That’s because is you “know” that you’re a clear thinker, you’re less likely to suspect that you might be missing something big in your thought process.
Read 47 tweets
Feb 26
Why time seems to pass faster as we age.

🧵
1/ I’ve been mega-obsessed with this feeling.

A year as a 36 year old seems so much shorter as compared to when I was a kid or even as a teen.

It seems cosmically unfair - have less years to live, and each year is flying by faster.
2/ But, why is that happening?

My tentative conclusion is that it’s an unfortunate outcome of how evolution shaped our brain to be an efficient storage device.
Read 17 tweets
Feb 19
A (massive) thread on dopamine

🧵
1/ If you prefer the blog format, this thread is available on my website too:

invertedpassion.com/a-primer-on-do…
2/ I recently made notes on the book “Hooked” but wasn’t satisfied by the depth of explanation in it.

So, I went about doing my own research on how to make habit-forming products.

invertedpassion.com/notes-from-the…
Read 74 tweets
Dec 30, 2023
List of books I read in 2023.

🧵
1/ My favorite one was perhaps this one. It traces parallels between religion and trans-humanism.

Highly, highly recommend it.

2/ Highly recommend "Four Thousand Weeks" also. It's an anti-productivity manifesto.

My notes ->

invertedpassion.com/the-anti-produ…
Read 45 tweets
Aug 21, 2023
Effective technique for not getting involved with thoughts and emotions. Image
Correction: it’s acceptance commitment therapy.

By the way, not fusing with thoughts and emotions is the core of mindfulness and is pretty powerful.
Thoughts and emotions that bubble up to your consciousness is mostly clickbait - they got selected precisely because they’re exaggeration’s fabricated to make you pay attention.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(