Mexico's new #copyright law was passed in haste, without real consultation or debate, as part of the country's obligations under Trump's #USMCA. It's an unconstitutional catastrophe.
The Mexican copyright law imports the USA's restrictions on removing digital locks. These locks are everywhere, used by giant corporations to prevent independent repair, lock out competing consumables and parts, and monopolize app stores.
4/11
This means that independent security researchers can't audit our devices and services and warn us about their defects. These bugs fester in devices we trust with our lives, waiting to be weaponized.
5/11
Cyber arms-dealers like the NSO Group sell weapons based on these bugs to dictators and thugs, including whoever hacked independent Mexican journalists:
As Bruce Schneier says, "Anyone can design a security system that works so well they can't think of a way to defeat it. That doesn't mean it works, that just means it works against people stupider than them."
8/11
We can't rely on companies' own assurances about the security of our medical implants, cars, farm equipment and voting machines. Companies should not be in charge of when someone gets to warn us about defects in their products.
9/11
Mexico's new law lacks even the minimal (and inadequate) safeguards of the US version. Its "security exemption" is absolutely useless - it copies language that no US security researcher has been able to use in over 20 years.
10/11
Cybersecurity is a core issue to the exercise of human rights in the 21st century. Mexico's National Commission for Human Rights MUST act to overturn this dangerous law!
11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"If the government is really concerned ... it should look at data privacy more broadly & enact more comprehensive data-privacy regulation that would restrict how all companies, not just TikTok, collect & retain & use user data.” - @DavidGreene in @GridNewsgrid.news/story/technolo…
Each TikTok user “does their own threat modeling; they can determine to what extent, if they have enough knowledge about how their data is used, whether the threat that using the app poses is something that’s acceptable for them."-@DavidGreene in @GridNewsgrid.news/story/technolo…
It's Sunshine Week, and that means The Foilies, EFF and @MuckRock's annual faux awards for agencies that behave badly when confronted with public records requests. The winners are… eff.org/deeplinks/2023…
The Federal Bureau of Investigation for dragging its feet in providing records on how it was keeping tabs on The Monkees. eff.org/deeplinks/2023…
The National Security Agency for being transparent about the thousands of times it could neither confirm nor deny it had information requested by a member of the public. eff.org/deeplinks/2023…
Victory! The security expert @olabini was finally declared innocent yesterday in a unanimous verdict by a three-judge tribunal in Ecuador. 1/ peoplesdispatch.org/2023/02/01/dig…
@olabini Since his 70-day arbitrary detention in 2019, Ola Bini’s case has been impacted by numerous due process violations and human rights concerns. It went through suspensions or delays at nearly every stage of his trial. 2/ eff.org/deeplinks/2023…
@olabini He faced unfounded accusations based on misunderstandings of technology, which disregarded the vital role of security experts and secure technology to safeguard everyone’s rights and security. 3/ eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
El Martes 31 de enero se reinstala la audiencia de juicio de @olabini. Estamos pendientes y esperando que la corte de un ejemplo de transparencia y ajustado a los criterios técnicos y legales.
@eff Nos preocupa que un único día de audiencia no baste para terminar un juicio ya lleno de retrasos e irregularidades eff.org/es/deeplinks/2…
@eff Este proceso y la necesidad de decisiones ajustadas a criterios técnicos y legales son vitales para los derechos digitales en Ecuador.
More than 80 public interest groups remind UN Member States that the broad and undefined concepts contained in the #UNCybercrimeTreaty - such as “terrorism” and “extremism” - should not be used as a basis to restrict freedom of expression. eff.org/deeplinks/2022…
The Criminalization Chapter under the #UNCybercrime Treaty should be restricted to core cybercrimes – criminal offenses where ICT systems are the direct objects and instruments of the crimes. eff.org/deeplinks/2022…
Clusters 2 to 10 of the #UNCybercrime Treaty include offenses that are not core cybercrimes, are drafted with vague language, or are offenses that interfere with protected speech. These cluster of offenses should be excluded from the proposed Convention. eff.org/deeplinks/2022…
@EFF During the negotiations of the #UNCybercrimeTreaty in Vienna, EFF urged UN Member States to focus on the criminal conduct of using security tools rather than the mere possession, production, or distribution. /2 eff.org/files/2023/01/…
@EFF Article 10 of the #UNCybercrimeTreaty over-criminalizes password sharing. While passwords can be illegally sold for profit, many are shared by friends and family without profit. The article could turn millions of persons into cybercriminals overnight eff.org/pages/oral-int…