SOURCE OF INTRIGUE:
The FBI memo of interviews with Igor Danchenko sheds light on the sourcing for the Steele dossier. But it also provides contradictions about the involvement of Sergei Millian, who was reported to be a key dossier source. dailycaller.com/2020/07/29/ser…
The FBI memo of interviews with Igor Danchenko sheds light on the sourcing for the Steele dossier. But it also provides contradictions about the involvement of Sergei Millian, who was reported to be a key dossier source. dailycaller.com/2020/07/29/ser…
Millian was identified by WSJ and ABC News on Jan. 24, 2017 as a key source for the dossier's most explosive claims (the pee tape, etc.). That happened to be the same day that Danchenko met the FBI.
The question: why was Millian identified early on but not Danchenko or others?
The question: why was Millian identified early on but not Danchenko or others?
The main inconsistency is that Steele told the FBI and *someone* told the media that Millian was a source for the pee tape claim. But Danchenko told the FBI he isn't even sure if he spoke w/ Millian, and if he did, it was a month after Steele wrote the pee tape memo.
That inconsistency has been apparent since the IG report came out, but Millian released emails a few days ago showing that Danchenko reached out to him on July 21, 2016, a month after the pee tape memo.
