Valerio De Stefano Profile picture
Jul 31, 2020 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Together with many researchers I deeply admire, I have signed a letter written by @veenadubal and others to express concerns about corporate-sponsored research on the gig economy. THREAD 👇🏼
This kind of research is often based on non-replicable or non-transparent data. It is sometimes based on deeply flawed or biased data collection and it is used to push regulators in the direction platforms want, depriving workers of essential labor rights👇🏼medium.com/@gigeconomyres…
Various platforms have contacted me in the past offering to cooperate on research about the gig-economy. I have never accepted such cooperation because it was evident they wanted to control the narrative of the research output. Saying ‘no’ in this case is possible and a duty
To know more about the serious concerns raised about platforms-endorsed research, this piece by @janinemberg and @HannahJx0 is essential and is aptly titled “Too good to be true” journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
To conclude. Platforms are looking for ways to spin unrealistic narratives depicting bogus self-employment as favorable to workers, while in fact it denies them due protection and is a burden to society 👇🏼
Platforms have always tried to manipulate the narrative to push for deregulation or non-regulation. As more and more lawmakers and courts around the world are now resisting these narratives, platforms want to use “research” to reverse the tide
As they do this, it is essential for academics to resist this cooperation when it doesn’t correspond to academic standards, for researchers and journalists to question the results of corporate-endorsed research and demand full access to the data 👇🏼
Finally, it is essential for policymakers to always be wary of research produced with corporate data that is used to spin deregulatory narratives. We all need more knowledge and research, but it is vital that they are based on transparent and accessible data
@threader_app compile please

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Valerio De Stefano

Valerio De Stefano Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @valeriodeste

Mar 11
I got a question about the nature of the compromise. Is the Directive a big, meaningful change? In short, yes, it is. A short🧵below.
1) The Directive will force Member States to adopt a presumption of employment for platform workers. This is less stringent than the very strong presumption the EU Parliament wanted but much more meaningful than what Member States and the Commission initially proposed.
2) The national presumption will have to be based on “facts” instead of legal criteria as in the Commission’s and Council’s texts. This is a true procedural help for platform workers claiming reclassification. Also, the Directive expressly states that: (i) the this presumption…
Read 9 tweets
Apr 3, 2023
Quando avete tempo, possiamo anche discutere del fatto che il Garante NON ha affatto bloccato ChatGPT, né ha mai deciso che in Italia vada bloccata l’intelligenza artificiale né sistemi di LLM come ChatGPT. Discutiamo da tre giorni di una allucinazione collettiva. THREAD 👇🏼
Il Garante ha notificato a ChatGPT che 1) non ha predisposto una informativa sulla privacy; 2) non ha chiarito a che titolo tratti i dati personali degli utenti che processa; 3) non prevede meccanismi per evitare che i minori di 13 anni accedano al servizio (la stessa OpenAI…
… si è preposta questi limiti di età). Tutti questi punti non sono una trovata goliardica del Garante ma sono chiaramente richiesti dal GDPR della UE. Il Garante NON ha bloccato ChatGPT. Open AI, la società che gestisce CHAT GPT ha settimane di tempo per spiegare come intende..
Read 13 tweets
Apr 1, 2023
THREAD on AI, ChatGPT, and the Scientific Method. 1/ We've undergone the Scientific Revolution in a (problematic) attempt to understand the world and nature, including human nature, and then to dominate it through science and technology.
2/ The ultimate (again, problematic) goal of this endeavour was to gain control over these elements, to dominate them and bend them to our will. One of the fundamental aspects of the scientific method is the experiment, as it allows for replicability. #ScientificMethod
3/ Once you identify a principle, you can repeat the experiment with the same results and then apply those results on a large scale in the real world. What puzzles me about the current movement towards AI is that we want to create increasingly independent systems
Read 7 tweets
Feb 2, 2023
+++CHATGPT IN A COURT DECISION +++
And so it begins! I am sharing here the first (as far as i know) judgement that openly used ChatGPT to ground its reasoning. It is in Spanish. THREAD
diariojudicial.com/public/documen…
The crucial part starts on p. 5, where the Court reports the answers to the legal questions they posed to ChatGPT. Then, at the end of p. 6, the Court adopts the arguments given in these answers as grounds for its decision.
Apparently, the use of ICT in judicial decisions is allowed by the law in Colombia. The Court says: "The arguments for this decision will be determined in line with the use of artificial intelligence (AI). Accordingly, we entered parts of the legal questions posed...
Read 12 tweets
Nov 28, 2022
NEW BOOK OUT! 🧵We are delighted that "A Research Agenda for the Gig Economy and Society" is out today. Ilda Durri, Charalampos Stylogiannis, @MathiasWouters1, and I edited it. It features chapters by a wonderful, interdisciplinary group of scholars THREAD e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/a-res…
As editors, we wrote the intro and first chapter of the book. This is the only chapter that discusses the employment status of platform workers across the globe in the book. All the other chapters concentrate on other, new and vital issues that affect these workers worldwide👇🏼
@AudeCefaliello and @CristinaInversi analyze the OSH risks suffered by platform workers and the challenges this work and other precarious forms of work present to regulators that aim at mitigating these risks. This is a hugely understudied and crucial topic👇🏼
Read 15 tweets
Sep 29, 2022
+++BREAKING ON PLATFORM WORK AND VULNERABLE SELF-EMPLOYED WORK+++ The EU Commission just released its Guidelines exempting solo self-employed workers, including platform workers, from EU antitrust law for the purpose of collective bargaining - THREAD competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2…
The Guidelines cover ‘solo self-employed person’, i.e. persons who are not in an employment relationship and rely primarily on their own personal labour for the provision of the services concerned
This notion corresponds to the personal work approach to competition law and collective bargaining advanced by @N_Countouris, myself and other colleagues like @IoannisLianos (based on a longstanding idea of Mark Freedland and Nicola) HOWEVER… socialeurope.eu/collective-bar…
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(