I’m going to rant about @DisneyStudios and @disneyplus’s decision to offer #Mulan for viewing at home, as a one-time rental, for $30, at a time when 30 million Americans are out of work, schools are closed, and parents have to keep their kids home for their health. Shame. Shame.
I don’t pretend to understand the “thinking” that went into @disneyplus setting a rental price of $30 for #Mulan, but here’s my guess: $30 is what @DisneyStudios imagines a “typical family of four” would pay for movie theater tickets on discount.
For a company that charges around $400 a day for a family of four to visit their theme park, $30 for a two-hour movie probably seems like a ridiculous bargain, right, @WaltDisneyCo?
The fact that $400 a day is beyond the reach of probably 75%-90% of most Americans doesn’t much matter to @WaltDisneyCo since most visitors to America’s Magic Kingdoms outside California and Florida probably are making a once-in-a-lifetime vacation out of it.
But it kinda matters to the millions of average Americans who work crap jobs for minimum wage or maybe a little more, and who will *never* get to take their kids to a @DisneyParks but who at least sometimes take them to a @DisneyStudios movie, saving up for weeks to do so.
Think I’m exaggerating? Do the math. Imagine you’re a two-income family earning about $85,000 a year (according to the U.S. BLS). After payroll taxes you’re left with about $75,000.
Out of that $75,000 you have to pay for mortgage/rent (typically half your total income if you’re lucky), food for four, utilities, auto, clothes, health insurance (maybe with a subsidy), and other out of pocket expenses.
IF YOU’RE VERY LUCKY, maybe you’ll have enough left over every week to treat your family to a MacDonalds dinner. And maybe maybe maybe a few times a year you or your spouse will be able to take them to a movie matinee. One of you will stay home because you can’t afford both.
Oh, and because it’s not that expensive for value received, and because at least it’s *something* you can do for your kids since you ain’t never gonna afford to take them to Disneyland no matter how much they beg you, you get the $7 a month subscription to @disneyplus.
And now your kids hear that a @DisneyStudios movie they’ve been waiting for for months, #Mulan, is going to be on their favorite streaming channel, @disneyplus!! Joy, joy, they’re so excited, they’ve been going stir crazy, they can’t wait to see it.
Maybe you and your spouse are two of the “lucky” workers who hasn’t lost their job. Maybe one of you has lost your job. Maybe you both have, and you’re barely scraping by on the unemployment insurance that just ran out this week.
WHATEVER your financial condition, as an average working American, you’re terrified of the future right now. You’re tottering on the edge of ruin and you know it.
Your kids’ school probably won’t open and even if it does you don’t know if it’s safe for them to go but if they don’t, how can you or your spouse keep your jobs (if either of you still has a job) if you can’t do something with your kids?
Your life is a nightmare of insecurity. And into that nightmare, @DisneyStudios and @disneyplus toss a $30 time bomb. Your kids will want to see this movie and you won’t want to disappoint them, but $30 on top of the $7 you’re already paying every month? Really?
@DisneyStudios is not doing the average American parent in the middle of a financial crisis and a pandemic any favors by offering #Mulan on @disneyplus for an additional $30. They’re kicking families while they’re down. It’s shameless and evil and wrong.
Sure, money men will make the argument $30 is less than what a movie matinee might cost— but watching a movie at home, as Chris Nolan might tell you, isn’t the same experience as seeing it in a theater. Especially not for a kid. A theater treat is an *event* in a child’s life.
@disneyplus is putting financially strained parents in an impossible position with #Mulan — cynically exploiting (as @Disney always has) the pressure children bring to bear on parents. Usually this cynicism is obnoxious but more or less tolerable. But at a time of crisis?
Shame on you, @disneyplus, @DisneyStudios, @Disney — #shame on you for putting profit over decency. You could have shown corporate compassion and solidarity with America’s struggling families. Instead you chose a money grab.
That’s a real Mickey Mouse move.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sunday political 🧵: Federalism is the hope and the scourge of progressivism in America. The U.S. has a federal system of political power division; conservatives understand this on a practical political leverage level, progressives don’t.
Up until recently, every school kid learned about the federal system (I don’t know if they still do; schooling has changed a lot since I went), but mostly in our daily lives we ignore it and think we live in a unified nation governed by a single set of laws. We actually don’t.
We I say “federal” you probably think “the Government” and you think of Washington as the seat of government. But that isn’t what federal means at all. Its basis is “federation”— and if you’re a Star Trek fan, maybe the penny is dropping.
A question I’m often asked at conventions is “How do you break into comics?” I have no idea— the last time I tried it was 1967. But a better question might be: “How do you write a ‘good’ comic?” For that, I have a few ideas.
First, foremost: Read. Read a lot. Don’t just read comics, read books. Lots and lots of books. Always have a book with you and read at every opportunity. Read at lunch, be that weirdo. Read on the bus. On planes. On trains. Don’t read while driving.
Second, vital: Keep reading. Read fiction, read non-fiction, read history, science, economics, more fiction, “literature,” mysteries, science fiction, westerns. Stuff yourself with words. Ideas. Odd facts and bits of legend. Poetry, Shakespeare, e.e. cummings, doggerel.
People often asked me this past year*— “Gerry, how do you maintain a mostly cheerful attitude in your daily life, despite daily news accounts of misery, death, and human stupidity?”
“Well,” I tell them, “I practice the patented DDD Sanity Preservation Self-Protection System™!”
*nobody asks me.
What is this patented system of DDD Sanity Preservation™, you may ask? I shall be happy to explain. Thusly.
I have very loud neighbors. Just putting that here.
It’s like living next to a sports bar.
To put this in perspective, this is a quiet suburban neighborhood. The folks who own the house and live in it are 30-40-something with kids. Like the Dunphys in Modern Family. They’re now singing drunkenly, loudly, out of tune.
Spoiler free reaction to Zack Snyder's JL: I wish the man who made this movie had made "Man of Steel" and "BvS". Maybe Snyder took to heart some of the criticism of those two movies, because tonally this is a different piece-- a paean to the power of hope and healing.
I also understand why Ray Fisher was so upset by the "restructuring" of the film (aside from his reports of abusive behavior): The major human emotional arc of this film belongs to Victor Stone, and its loss in the theatrical JL cuts the heart out of the story.
I don't know whether it was because of WB's demand for a much shorter film, and the necessity that created for reshoots to elipsize chunks of plot, which in turn rushed the CGI work, but, boy, does this "rebuilt" cut kick ass visually.
I’ve heard some on the left worry @JoeBiden won’t be progressive enough, won’t fight back against #GOP perfidy, etc., because he’s always been a moderate. Hey. Who a President was, politically, before he becomes President, and what he “stood for”, is historically irrelevant.
Lincoln wasn’t in favor of abolition when he ran for President; he ran as a “moderate” against slavery’s expansion, not its elimination. He fought against emancipation for months until he finally came around. His opponents in the South forced him to change.
FDR ran as a fiscal, social *conservative* in 1932, promising a balanced budget and no deficits. His political party had other ideas— most New Deal legislation was a result of FDR watering down those ideas, not pushing them forward. He took bold action because he *had* to.