ASI excavation in 2003 done on court orders. ASI directors in this included Muslims, labourers too on demand of Muslim side. ASI report found evidence of temple rediff.com/news/2003/aug/… & tribuneindia.com/2003/20030826/… Of course, despite their demands being granted, they rejected it (1)
In December 1990, the Chandra Shekhar government invited the two groups involved, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad and the Babri Masjid Action Committee, to mandate a team of scholars for discussing the historical truth of the matter of Ayodhya, where a temple pre-existed or not (2)
Misled by the media into believing that Hindu claims were fake, the BMAC office-bearers arrived at the Dec 1990 scholars' meet ill-prepared, expecting a cakewalk over 'VHP fanatics'. They were speechless when the VHP team presented dozens of documents supporting their case! (3)
Until 1989 there had been no question about the Ayodhya Ramjanmabhoomi site's history. All written sources, whether Hindu, Muslim or European, were in agreement about the pre-existence of a Ram temple at the site. 1989 edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica too said this (4)
There was testimony after testimony of Hindus bewailing and Muslims boasting of the replacement of the temple with a mosque. Yet, in 1989, a group of 25 academics from JNU Delhi, mostly declared Marxists, issued a statement denying the existence of any evidence for the temple(5)
They gave no evidence at all, but sympathy of the Indian & world media for their purported motive of "upholding secularism" assured immediate worldwide adoption of their lies as Gospel truth: 'the claim of demolition of Ram temple is just a malicious invention of the Hindus' (6)
Under the prevailing power equation, the Marxist 'historians' expected to get away with a plain denial of history. Believing Marxists, Syed Shahabuddin of BMAC said in 1990 that 'he will destroy Babri with hammer if proven a temple pre-existed there' timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/After-Arc… (7)
But after it was proven in the December 1990-January 1991 scholars meeting with irrefutable evidence presented by the Hindu side, Shahabuddin was left speechless and did a U-turn. The Muslim side had agreed to give up claim if proven a temple pre-existed, but it did a U-turn (8)
In the Dec 1990 scholars' meet, BMAC men were speechless when the VHP team presented dozens of documents supporting their case. The BMAC then invited a team of proper historians [Marxists] chaired by Marxist professor R.S. Sharma, who arrived at the next meeting in Jan 1991 (9)
In this Jan 1991 meeting, the Marxist historians demanded that they be recognized as "independent scholars" entitled to sit in judgment, i.e. to pass a verdict between their BMAC employers & their VHP opponents! 🤣The govt representative did not grant this hilarious demand! (10)
At d next meeting, d Marxist historians of BMAC declared that they hadn't studied d evidence yet & needed 6 more weeks! These same people had just led 42 academics in signing a petition confirming once & for all that there was absolutely no evidence of a temple pre-existing!(11)
At d meeting scheduled for 24 Jan1991 d Marxist historians simply didn't show up anymore! This 1990-91 scholars' meet was a RESOUNDING VICTORY for d Hindu side. It exposed Marxists' lies, U-turn of Muslims who didn't give up claim, nor could they disprove temple pre-existence(12)
Later ASI did an excavation on court orders in 2003, labourers who did d digging included a number of Muslims & 4 out of 20 authors of ASI report which found the temple were also Muslims [both labourers & authors included as per their demand], and the excavation found temple(13)
All along, post-1989 d Marxist-Muslims had claimed that Babri had been built on virgin land. Later when existence of a structure [clearly temple] was proven, they started claiming that d pre-existing structure was Buddhist, or were 'older mosques'! 🤣Claim of 'virgin land'?(14)
In short, nothing in the world will ever make them accept that the Babri Masjid was built after demolishing a temple on that site, despite conclusive literary, archeological evidence. Despite ASI report authors including Muslims, labourers digging being Muslims. Frauds! (15)
