The whole "is it airborne" and "droplets vs aerosols" debate is a case of technical jargon impeding public understanding.
"Airborne" for the purposes of hospital infection prevention is not the same as "airborne" as a risk communication message.
They're thinking "oh, so I get it by breathing it in, not just surface contact."
"Droplets" does not convey that idea effectively.
Less airborne than measles? For sure. Substantially less risk of airborne transmission outdoors than indoors? Absolutely.
So rather than tie ourselves in knots over terminology, we should just say that it is functionally airborne in indoor settings.