<small thread 🧵>

A short explanation of this paper (so any of you using it don't misinterpret it and make a mistake) :

1st - The green (puberty) and pink (psycho-social maturity) bars are NOT intrinsically matched to each other.

They don't have to match.
2nd - basically if everyone had unlimited food & no diseases (i.e no evolutionary pressure) then everyone would hit puberty at 9 (green bar)

Age of puberty was higher in places like medieval Europe because they had less food, thus it was a disadvantage to have kids at 9
2nd cont. - today this is no longer the case due to the Industrial Revolution and thus increased food production (why the green bar is lower today)

Nor was this the case at more temperate latitudes which had better food production (more sunlight = faster food production)
3rd - what the psycho-social maturity (pink bar) means is basically the minimum level of intelligence required to function in society.

Learning how to hunt for food/pick safe (non-toxic) berries would have been apart of psychosocial maturity in medieval times.
3rd cont. - today it would be learning how to drive a car, use the subway system, how traffic lights work, file taxes, etc... things that are more complex than just picking berries/cooking food

In the future the minimum psycho social maturity might require how to fly a spaceship
3rd cont. - thus the pink part is complete irrelevant when it comes to Aisha's marriage.

The only part that is relevant in the Islamic marriage sense, is just the capacity to be a mother/parent/wife.
4th - the most important part is about "reproductive competence" i.e the ability to actually have babies, which can happen as low as 9 (this concurs with Grays Anatomy reference)

It refutes any misconception that you can't have kids at that age.
This is just a short explanation of this study and the parts relevant to the discussion of Aisha's marriage and Islam.

So anyone who uses it knows what it means, and how to use it properly.

</thread >

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️

Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TenMillionIQ

6 Dec 20
<thread 🧵>

A thread debunking the feminist myth that what you wear doesn't matter, and clothing doesn't prevent sexual harassments. (Proven with scientific studies on the topic)

Short summary: Yes the hijab does prevent sexual harassments and attracts less male attention ImageImage
Scientific studies have shown women are aware of the sexual signals their clothing sends:

1- Women who wore immodest clothing did so in order to flirt with strangers.

2- Women who wore sexual clothing did so in order to have sex with strangers.

tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108… ImageImageImage
More scientific studies confirm these findings, and have also shown women who wear immodest or sexual clothing self-objectify themselves, which cause anxiety, unhappiness, body-dissatisfaction, and body shame.

link.springer.com/article/10.118… ImageImageImage
Read 25 tweets
21 Oct 20
<thread 🧵>

Why atheists have sex with dogs - (explained from the point of view of atheism as to accurately represent atheist voices)

A thread exposing atheism, & why normal people will never accept atheism (proven with scientific papers)
You might have seen this video of a PhD atheist philosopher promoting bestiality as a human right

It's not surprising, many sexual orientations were persecuted a decade ago, & this is the next new sexual orientation that secular atheism wants to liberate

Bestiality in atheism goes back to the French Revolution.

Back then secular atheists used to commit public acts of bestiality to protest against religion

Source: Miletski, H., 2005. A history of bestiality. Anthrozoos-Journal of the International Society for Anthrozoology
Read 10 tweets
14 Oct 20
<thread 🧵>

The Incoherence of atheism: Part 1: How atheism Contradicts Itself

A series of threads on how atheism in of itself does not make logical sense, and can only be explained as irrational.
atheists deny religion solely on their misotheistic feelings, yet do not deny other forms of ideologies.

Religion after all is just another kind of ideology, no different than political ideologies (which many atheist basically worship as their neo-god)
For example lets compare religion to liberalism:

In religion there is "blasphemy", "heresy"

In liberalism/atheism/secularism they have "hate speech", "home/trains-phobia", "TERF" etc...

Just another noun to describe the same thing: "anything that offends"
Read 13 tweets
16 Sep 20
<thread 🧵>

Thread on how atheism causes higher crime rates.
Numerous scientific evidence has shown that atheists commit more crimes and have higher per-capita crime rates.

A meta-analysis shows that atheism increases crime rates in children and young adults.

It's also scientifically proven a lack of religion results in higher rates of drug abuse.

And higher religiosity results in lower rates of drug abuse.

Read 10 tweets
14 Jul 20
debunking atheism (cont.) <thread? 🧵>

As John Locke states atheism puts a stop to learning.

Here's a simple question that might explain:

Question # 1⃣: Why should atheism be promoted now that it has been scientifically proven to be an evolutionary disadvantage?
You will notice atheism cannot answer these because there is a contradiction in their beliefs, a contradiction with actual science.

Question # 2⃣: Why should anyone believe in atheism, now that it's scientifically proven it harms your health, and has no benefits to your health?
#1 & #2 are very direct questions that get straight to the point.

More indirect questions assuming they claim to have morals would be:

Question # 3⃣: How does atheism logically decide what is good and what is bad?

This is a good way of seeing if an atheism is educated or not.
Read 6 tweets
10 Jul 20
Top 10 reasons to leave atheism - a thread 🧵
1⃣ - Atheism promotes sex with dogs as a human right

In the secular liberal moral framework of atheism, bestiality would be a human right.

Atheism tells you to stop believing in God and believe in sex with dogs as a human right.

2⃣ - Atheism is bad for your mental health

Scientific studies prove atheism if one of the leading causes behind worsening mental health, higher rates of depression & unhappiness.

Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!