Again, so huge. Held that:
1) Mags are "protected arms" under the 2nd Amendment
2)So-called "large capacity mags" are "commonly owned" and not unusual
3) "Substantially burdened" right of self defense
4) Wasn't least restrictive means to achieve state interests
1) Mags are "protected arms" under the 2nd Amendment
2)So-called "large capacity mags" are "commonly owned" and not unusual
3) "Substantially burdened" right of self defense
4) Wasn't least restrictive means to achieve state interests
Judge Lee also accurately noted the racist origin of gun control (see p. 34-38)
d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/firearmspolicy…
d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/firearmspolicy…
Obviously this isn’t quite over yet — as been stated, Becerra could demand en banc review, they could try fighting this up to SCOTUS, which would be as strategically bad for them as the NYC ordinance, which they realized almost too late and tried to walk back.
