Senate Democrat leader Chuck Schumer went to the steps of the Supreme Court and physically threatened the justices, if they didn't rule his way on a pending case.
For months, Biden Democrats threatened and intimidated Supreme Court justices and their families in their homes.
With that same pending case.
The Biden White House and Justice Department encouraged these illegal obstruction-of-justice campaigns, falsely stating they were protected by the First Amendment. (They are absolutely not. They are a federal crime.)
Even after justices and their families went to safe houses.
Even after the 1 am assassination attempt against Justice Kavanaugh, his wife Ashley, and their two teenage daughters.
Biden Democrats constantly attack Ginni Thomas for her lifelong political advocacy--in which she has engaged long before her husband became a judge or justice.
But Trump is somehow "threatening" by pointing out the clear political biases of Democrat judges, prosecutors, attorneys, their staffs, their adult family members, and witnesses?
If anyone on the planet has the absolute constitutional right to do this, it is a criminal defendant.
Especially one going through a criminal process that is so obviously politicized and weaponized against him.
Absent a compelling reason, it is shameful for Members of Congress to resign.
Their constituents lose their representative--for months.
These Members violate their promises and oaths:
"I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter."
And Mike Gallagher (@RepGallagher/@MikeforWI) timed his resignation so his Wisconsin constituents will not have a House representative for nearly 10 months.
Truly a disgrace.
"Gallagher’s decision to leave April 19 also means that there will not be a special election to fill his seat. Under Wisconsin state law, vacancies after the second Tuesday in April are filled in the general election, so Gallagher’s replacement will be decided in November and his seat will remain empty until January."
Federal judges must release January 6th protesters wrongfully convicted under the Biden DOJ’s politicized, bogus use of a federal criminal statute never intended to get weaponized against political opponents.
Trump 47 DOJ must hold accountable responsible Biden DOJ officials.
Today's decision by the Democrat-controlled DC Circuit Court of Appeals is as predictable as it is wrong.
Members of Congress are immune, both civilly and criminally, for their officials acts.
So are federal judges.
Why wouldn't the President of the United States--any President?
Four DC federal judges did not even establish at a baseline level that the President of the United States cannot be thrown in prison by his successor based upon his official acts.
They ignored the Constitution's separation of powers.
Thus, the Supreme Court must take and decide this case.
This case is much bigger than Trump.
This precedent is very dangerous and highly destructive to the presidency--thus, our Constitution and country.
This means the Trump 47 Justice Department can prosecute Obama--along with his aides like U.S. Circuit Judge David Barron, Obama's legal advisor at the time--for capital murder for their extrajudicial drone-striking of American citizens (including a minor).
This also means the Trump 47 Justice Department can prosecute Biden for his illegal release of dangerous migrants into the United States and the natural and probable crimes they commit.
(So they can ignore their ruling to protect Obama and Biden.)
If the Supreme Court wants the federal judiciary to keep any legitimacy with half of the American people, it must do its job and fix this dangerously wrong ruling.
"The Biden administration’s effort to establish itself as a committed champion of press freedom is facing new doubts because of the Justice Department’s aggressive legal tactics against a conservative provocateur known for his hidden-camera video stings."
"A predawn FBI raid last weekend against Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe and similar raids on some of his associates are prompting alarm from some First Amendment advocates, who contend that prosecutors appear to have run roughshod over Justice Department media policies and a federal law protecting journalists."