Hey @RexArcherMD, director of @KCMOHealthDept as you and @QuintonLucasKC hold the people of KC hostage with the threat of another lockdown if we don’t “behave” with ineffective mask policies I was wondering if you could address some things for us
Why after over a month of mask mandates did we see cases double in the KC area? Also, did you not look at other areas of the country that have had mandates for months yet still saw cases spike? Why are you so focused on masks?
In scientific theory you have a hypothesis and then analyze the results to see if they match what you originally thought. But it seems you and others around the country are desperate to do the opposite - make the results match your hypothesis.
Don’t you think there is a bit of a conflict of interest seeing as you are constantly RT’ing things about the evils of capitalism and the broken American system? Do you have any regard for the lives that depend on the American economic system?
For example, 25% of young adults seriously considered suicide during lockdowns according to the CDC. 1.4 million more people are going to die of TB according to the NYT. 6000 more kids per day will die according to UNICEF thanks to the lockdown’s disruptions.
But Rex continue to RT memes suggesting lockdowns are the only solution and it’s the American people who are to blame for the virus continuing to spread instead of the virus itself. If you haven’t noticed Australia and New Zealand are seeing cases again (no herd immunity)
Sweden’s not seeing another spike because they are over this. They’ve clearly reached herd immunity and their overall mortality is lower than it was in 2015. Toss around all the numbers you want around their COVID deaths, less people are dying in Sweden this year than 5 years ago
You declare New Zealand and Australia as success stories, yet now New Zealand is locking down again. Australia amended legislation to allow the government to take children from their parents homes. But this is what we should be aspiring to instead of ripping off the bandaid?
If lockdowns worked in Australia why are they threatening to take children from their homes?
You’re a doctor so I’m sure you’re aware that there are other ways to die than COVID. So are the lives that have and will be lost thanks to lockdowns somehow worth less than those that would through COVID, seeing as the number of the latter will likely be eclipsed by TB deaths?
And again, why do you think masks will work here when they didn’t #StopTheSpread in other areas? What happened to “slowing the spread”? Why did it change to stopping it despite all available evidence showing only herd immunity stops it?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is a false narrative emerging based on weak/little evidence that is attempting to blame the current issues around air travel on the removal of mask mandates. This is despite there being minimal disruptions for *two months* post-mandate and no documented outbreaks. 1/🧵
2/ As some of you know I've been periodically tracking flight disruptions for a while post-mandate. This was over a month after the mandate was removed. No issues:
3/ Compare this to over the holidays during the winter/omicron surge, where there were mass cancellations that airlines explicitly said were due to staff out with COVID. This was, of course, while the mask mandates were still in place. nytimes.com/2021/12/25/bus…
1/ It's nearly February 2022 and people are still posting flu data suggesting masks, distancing etc. virtually eliminate influenza. Seasonal viruses "disappearing" is something that has happened previously during other pandemics/epidemics, regardless of policy. This isn't new. 🧵
2/ It is true that in the United States, flu prevalence dropped dramatically once mask wearing became slightly more common (from 58% -> 70%) - but this is a spurious correlation that doesn’t hold up when looking at areas where masking is not-so-common.
3/ Based on the chart above, one could assume that when community masking reaches some threshold, flu prevalence drops dramatically. Yet, looking at influenza surveillance for high-mask areas like New York (86%) and low-mask areas like South Dakota (42%), you see the same trend.
1/ This ordinance proposal that I just read out of Jackson County, MO is truly insane. It essentially grants unilateral authority to the Jackson County Health Department. It would basically create a public health dictatorship.
2/ The health department (ominously labeled 'The Director' in this draft) can implement any public health measures they deem necessary in public and private schools as well as child care facilities, including "exclusion of people with suspected illnesses".
3/ The Director has the power to close any public or private school if they deem it a public health threat. They can close any place of public or private assembly. Presumably, this also includes churches. They cannot reopen unless The Director deems it safe.
This thread is chock-full of self-contradictions and a complete misrepresentation of the physics of fine aerosols, as well as a misunderstanding of how the NIOSH hierarchy of controls works and what types of PPE it represents.
The transmission dynamics of airborne particles are far from "basic physics", but Joseph misleads people here by suggesting we're still dealing with large droplets that predictably fall to the ground. Look up Stokes law Joseph. Strike 1.
Joseph says he was one of the first people to call for masks in this Washington Post article.
In it, he once again talks about "droplets" and suggests fomite transmission is a major threat (it isn't). Bizarre that he'd still share this article. Strike 2.
1/ An article/chart that suggest the state of Missouri's health dept suppressed data that "found masks work" has been making the rounds lately with a few particular posts getting thousands of likes and retweets. In reality, the data completely contradict what they're saying.
2/ First, the timeline they chose was completely arbitrary and includes a significant portion of time when both groups did not have mandates in place. The case numbers started diverging *two months* before the first mask mandates started, suggesting significant confounders.
3/ But what if people started wearing masks prior to mandates? The data don't support that - the number of people wearing masks only significantly increased after the mandates started. delphi.cmu.edu/covidcast/indi…
1/ The letter the US DOE sent today to several states saying they are opening an investigation into their ban on school mask mandates is dangerous and misguided. Their main claim is that banning mask mandates in schools creates an unsafe environment for at-risk kids.
2/ They open the letter by saying cases are rising in both the US population and school-aged children - which is true but has nothing to do with masks in schools. They mention rising hospitalizations in kids but fail to mention we are seeing an enormous out-of-season RSV spike.
3/ Additionally, other countries that experienced a delta wave such as the UK did not see rising pediatric hospitalization rates. It doesn't make much sense that delta would be uniquely dangerous to US kids. COVID co-infection with RSV could explain this.