Yossi Gestetner Profile picture
Aug 20, 2020 14 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Per SDNY, the 4 people behind “Build the Wall” kept saying in public that they are not getting paid but that they did get paid a total of over a million dollars by giving the million dollars to a non-profit run by Bannon.

This is the crime here.

justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/l…
Basically, if #BuildTheWall leaders said up front that “we raised $25 million and $1 million of it - way less than most non profits - goes to those who run/promote the fund,” there would be no story here. This is a reminder of how easy it is for Feds to prosecute if they want.
Mueller prosecuted Manafort’s Associate’s Attorney (Zwan) for lying about a legal thing not related to collusion. Such are the acts of the Feds when they want to crush someone. Meanwhile, people who obstructed justice by destroying evidence (Clinton emails) got a pass on it.
I am saying this becasue Trump Fans live in lala land as to what Durham will do. Well, he is 16 months on the job and there are no unrelated crimes or process crimes prosecuted as is most often the case with the Feds. Remember congressman Michael Grimm? He was investigated for
political corruption related to the 2012 election. The Feds had nothing so they went back a few years and saw that as a store owner pre his political life, Grimm paid employees $1 million in cash which saved the company payroll tax. Boom. Arrested. Charged. Imprisoned.
Don’t tell me that FBI Comey/DOJ Lynch (and @SallyQYates) were legit when the underlying crime of obstruction got a pass and don’t tell me that Durham is major when after 16 months on the job he has no unrelated/process cases; a tactic that Mueller had and what Feds often have.
It’s amazing how the propagandists have set the stage: If the Trump Admin investigates/prosecutes Biden’s family and/or the 2016 Power Abusers, then it’s banana republic stuff. If Trump people get prosecuted by a DOJ office, then it’s great. The same goes for a Dem DA who is
going after 8 years tax records of a president from an opposing political party based mainly on “published reports” that maybe he did something wrong. It’s cheered on as no-one-is-above-the-law stuff by the same people who claim a reversed situation is Banana Republic stuff.
In summary: In recent years, people on the Obama/Biden/Clinton side got a pass on underlying crimes and thinking of prosecuting it is Banana Republic stuff.

People on the Trump side however got crushed for unrelated and/or process crimes because no-one-is-above-the-law.
The #BuildTheWall bust came today because SDNY wanted to arrest Bannon off of a yacht to help create the image that he is living the good life off of the back of wall donors. Nice theatrics there. Bannon & Co got way less proportionally from BTW than do Lincoln Project leaders,
but the amount does not matter. If companies from TLP leaders bill the PAC for services, then it’s legit unlike the wall guys who allegedly created misleading invoices to conceal the purpose of the funds. My point is that SDNY is trying to create an image of Bannon loving large
off of the wall fund when neither being being on a yacht nor the total sums that he got prove that. The violation is the crooked books. Had he been up front about the billing, then he could have legally gotten way more and be on a nicer yacht with no story for SDNY. Anyway.
BTW the DNC “defrauded” their donors by pretending from the outside that the process is fair but they sandbagged Bernie Sanders in 2016. Bernie donors filed a case in FL but it eas dismissed. Were it the RNC, Feds would lead the charge I guess.
In essense, Bannon and Co took a potion of money that they are eligible to have but they took it in a crooked way. It does not make it legal; it just tells you the facts in a way that SDNY does not tell it because they need to kick up a cloud of scandal so the public buys it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yossi Gestetner

Yossi Gestetner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @YossiGestetner

Jul 12
Biden certainly had worse public appearances since the debate than this pressser, but stop the propaganda that this was good.

He rambled on.

Confused names & things.

Stopped mid-point confusingly with "anyways."

And he wasn't pushed like Trump was in the @Acosta-era heckling.
Questions were given mostly only to state-aligned media.

Half the questions were about policy; not the key issue at hand.

He was not called to task about the lies of his administration regarding his medical tests.

The bar for this was set so low that this is "good."

Ha.
We are being propagandized:

The questions and behavior was what Putin gets; not Trump or DeSantis.

Yet, he rambled on confusingly. Offered up word salads and repeatedly stopped midpoint with "anyways" because he had no clue what he was saying.

This is "good," per narrative.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 19
2 million non-Jewish Arabs live in Israel, and Jews were "Palestinian" the same as non-Jews.

On the flip side, Palestinianism today is predicated on the notion that the area should be free of Jews; the same as in Nazi Germany.

Israel = Inclusivity.

Palestinianism = Nazism.
2/ It's not that Antisemites attach themselves to the "Palestinian" cause. The movement IS antisemitic because if Jews are Palestinian, then "Palestine will be free" from what? The Israel government? Um, if we call it Palestine, Jews will still be in the government. Then what?
3/ "Palestine" is a geographic area that had Jews, Muslims, Christians, so to use "Palestinians" as non-Jews only is Nazism.

This is worse than a white guy who wants NYC to be 91% white as it was in 1948. It's worse because Palestine in 1948 was +50% Jewish, then Arabs invaded. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 16
1/ Why didn’t Obama & Dems make Juneteenth a federal holiday a decade ago?

Simple. The day came into focus only when Trump had planned to return campaigning on 6/19/20. Faix storm ensued.

To own Trump, a federal holiday was born.

I am not complaining; I am giving you history.
2/ Check the Twitter feed of many congressional and Senate Dems, TV heads, and leftists pundits. Most of them literally never sent a tweet about Juneteenth before it became an issue to own Trump in 2020; some only had a mention here and there in previous years.
3/ For example, in all her years on Twitter until 2020, @SpeakerPelosi’s account had tweeted only 4 times abut Juneteenth.

In 2020 alone she tweeted it 4 times; passed a House resolution about the day and got it signed a federal holiday in June '21 by Biden.
Read 9 tweets
Jun 9
- There are no 250+ deaths from the rescue; sure not mostly civilians.

- There is no famine; 99.9% people are full-faced.

- It is not a "camp" of "refugees." It is a fully-developed neighborhood by people who never lived elsewhere.

It's a movement predicated on brazen lies!
Gaza claimed that 23,300 of its citizens died in the first 3 months of the war.

That's 260 deaths a day; 90 days in a row.

If true, the strike in Rafah 2 weeks ago; the strike on a "UN warehouse" last week; and deaths from the rescue would hardly be news.

It's a BS Machine.
No one sane refers to Hasidim in Williamsburg as refugees despite their grand parents having escaped from Europe and from Muslim-majority countries 70-80 years ago. Yet grandkids from Jordanians who worked 2 years for Jews in Haifa in the 1940's, are called refugees...

🤡 🌎
Read 9 tweets
Mar 11
The downside of mass mail-in ballots as seen in MA, NJ, KY and PA the last few years. Image
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 9
Can a POTUS retroactively revoke his political opponent's presidential privileges which paves the way for a raid on and prosecution of his opponent who is now seeking immunity from this POTUS?

The answer is yes. Biden did just that.
A Biden Judge asked the attorney of Biden's Political Opponet if a POTUS has the authority to take out his political opponent, and if the answer is no then it implies that Biden('s DOJ) can continue to try to take out his political opponent...

1984 wasn't this convoluted.
The Biden DOJ asked Trump for docs.

Trump claimed executive privilege (EP).

DOJ went to the WH for help.

Biden Deputized the National Archivist to revoke Trump's EP.

She did.

DOJ affidavit mentions violations of Archive laws (created by action above) as a reason to raid! 🚨 Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(