Next up in my "should and how do I PhD" series of videos... tips for PhD applications! feat e.g., knowing the faculty, reaching out to potential advisors, statements of purpose, how to be smart about letters of rec, etc. #phdchat
Going to summarize for folks who don't want to sit through the whole video! Tips for PhD applications:
(1) Check requirements early because they will surprise you with how different they can be
(2) Know the faculty in the departments you're applying to.
(2a) It is not enough to think "I want to do computer science" so you apply to every CS program. You have to know what KIND of CS you want to do, and that there's someone in the department who does that thing.

This is also important for two more reasons...
(3) Reach out to potential advisors, if you are in a field (v. common in STEM) where PhD students work very closely with advisors. This is not a REQUIREMENT but can be useful to you, in part because sometimes faculty simply can't take on new PhD advisees.
(3a) Do not send form letters. Tell them why you're interested in them. Look at recent publications. Dear Dr. X, I am considering applying to your department's PhD program. I see that you do X and I am very interested in X for Y reasons.
(4) Mention specific faculty in personal statements. This shows that you know the program and there's a specific reason you're applying there. If you send the exact same statement everywhere, this suggests you didn't do your research or that you have no idea what you want to do.
(4a) In the statement show that you have ideas and a vision, without seeming too rigid. Do not propose an exact dissertation in your statement. Mention multiple faculty to show that you have some flexibility. And emphasize research experience.
(5) Be smart with your letters of rec. Best letter comes from someone you did research with. If you ask an instructor, make sure they can say more than "they got an A in my class." Make sure they can say specific positive things about you (writing, engagement, etc.).
(5a) Do not ask someone to write you a letter just because they are a "name" if all they have to say is "they got an A in my class." Not useful! Always ask: "Can you write me a STRONG letter?" Only send strong letters.
(6) Probably don't stress about test scores. Lots of programs are dropping the requirements, and lots of faculty don't care about them anyway. I have literally never cared about test scores AT ALL and experience so far has made me think they're totally useless.
For all of this: Make sure you find out about the norms in YOUR DISCIPLINE. Your mileage may vary.

More nuance/detail in the video but hopefully this is helpful! Good luck! And if you're still noodling on the PhD thing you should watch this instead:
OH one more thing: I applied to PhD programs earlier in my life and was REJECTED FROM ALL OF THEM! So also know that if you strike out it is not the end of the world, you can try again, and it might even work out better in the end. :)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD

Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cfiesler

4 Sep
Recently some people have asked me how to reach out to potential advisors when applying to PhD programs. So here is a template - remember YMMV based on your discipline so find out about norms!

Dear Dr. __ , I am considering applying to your department's PhD program, one reason
being that I am very interested in the work you are doing on __ (for example, I particularly enjoyed your paper __ and see myself possibly doing that kind of work). My own research interests relate to ___ in these ways, and I have some research experience with ___. I'm wondering
if you will be considering taking on new PhD advisees, or if you have suggestions for other faculty I should reach out to. I'd be interested to hear more about the recent work in your lab, and I'd be happy to answer any questions or to talk if more information would be helpful.
Read 8 tweets
24 Jun
"What if racist facial recognition algorithms result in false arrests for people of color?" We've known of this speculative harm for years. But did not take the step to mitigate harm by banning use of this tech by law enforcement. So now it's happened. npr.org/2020/06/24/882…
Very recent steps taken by Amazon, Microsoft, and IBM are great but also too late - law enforcement already has this technology and smaller companies with less scrutiny are continuing to distribute it. I'd like to know what @DataWorksPlus is doing to mitigate harm. While Amazon, Microsoft and IBM have announced a halt to sal
I'm reminded of @robotsmarts' work on overtrust for AI. dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.114… That seems to be happening here - well the computer said it's him and computes don't lie. So why should they waste their time investigating? "They never even asked him any questions before arresti
Read 8 tweets
23 Jun
There is SO much to unpack here, especially in the context of broader conversations around content moderation, racism, and fandom (especially re: Archive of Our Own). Let's give it a shot. [Thread] theatlantic.com/technology/arc…
First, it's important to note that the My Little Pony fandom discussed here, which the articles notes is mostly adult, white men, is (though I assume there's overlap) very different demographics and community than AO3-based transformative fandom.
This paper has demographics from a survey of nearly 2000 mostly AO3/Tumblr transformative fandom folks. e.g., 80% stated they were female; the next most prevalent were non-binary and transgender individuals, with the least number of cisgender men. cmci.colorado.edu/~cafi5706/CSCW…
Read 15 tweets
20 Jun
Yay new case study? :-\
(1) Consider the use cases for this. Nothing in readme about how this shouldn't be used, privacy, etc.
(2) Examples in the comments of running this on images of Black faces, and the result coming out obviously white. I question the training data. :(
Read 7 tweets
18 Jun
Hello, new tech feature, let's do a speculative harm analysis to consider ways that terrible people might use you (and maybe what could be done about it?): a thread.
(1) It took less than an hour for a comment to appear in response to the above tweet with a voice tweet that's just audio from porn. And at least one response like 'I just played this in front of my dad!'
(1a) Porn audio tweet is still there... does that suggest it's not a TOS/rule violation? Why isn't it marked as "sensitive content"? Falls clearly under the "adult content policy." Will rules be updated for things you can do in audio but not text? help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-p…
Read 34 tweets
17 Jun
OK I'm going to weigh in on the tagging/content moderation conversation happening right now regarding Archive of Our Own. To be clear, this is me as a content moderation researcher who has also studied the design of AO3, NOT me as a member of the OTW legal committee. [Thread]
To clarify the issue for folks: Racism is a problem in fandom. In addition to other philosophical and structural things regarding OTW, there have been suggestions for adding required content warnings or other mechanisms to deal with racism in stories posted to the archive.
Here's a description of the content warning system from a paper I published about the design of AO3, in which I used this as an example of designing to mitigate the value tension of inclusivity versus safety. cmci.colorado.edu/~cafi5706/CHI2… Knowing that this tension would exist, and wanting to protec
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!