But it's really important to.
a) existential risk: the risk that youblow out or inhibit your ability to continue
b) other risk: risk where you're not at risk of seriously impeding your ability to operate.
By "risk" I mean "risk after EV". Burning $ isn't "risky", it's bad.
Now 0 isn't really a number when it comes to risk, maybe asteroids will come as we'll all lose all our money (and bodies and shrubbery).
But "really fucking low" is.
a) One view: it doesn't matter much, you win some you lose some. Again here "risk" means "0 EV risk", so upside is as big as downside
b) Another view: sure but if you lose a lot of them then you're back at existential risk
Well it means that other risk matters to the extent, but not as much. So how much?
EV IS LINEAR
RISK ISN'T LINEAR. RISK IS SQUARED.
Risking $3 is _more than_ 3X as bad as risking $1. In fact it's *9x* as bad. (Assuming law of large numbers.)
Why?
Well say you have EV = +1 and risk = 1. Then you do that 25 times.
You now have EV = +25 and risk = 5 (!!!).
This is equivalent to: variance goes as sqrt(time).
So the real cost you pay to risk is the square of the risk.
It means that EV / RISK is not the right metric. EV / (RISK * RISK) is.
(Unless you're making many bets at once and RISK is correlated between them, in which case you add the RISK!!!)
BUT REMEMBER EV IS LINEAR. "RISKING" 10% IS REALLY BAD IF YOU'RE DEFINITELY GOING TO LOSE EACH TIME!
1) it would bear the risk
2) it would make sure the risk wasn't anywhere near close to in the realm of existential
What's the max % of your portfolio you'd put into YFI/LEND/COMP/SNX/etc.?
Those were worth < 10% recently, they definitely could maybe go back.
If you'd put more than 1.1% in them, you're willing to risk more than 1%.
DON'T "RISK" 10% OF YOUR STACK IF IT'S NOT SIGNIFICANTLY POSITIVE EXPECTED VALUE. AND IF YOU THINK IT IS, IDK MAYBE IT ACTUALLY ISN'T.
STAY SAFE KIDS