LAWN SIGN REPORT (anecdotal, signs don't vote, etc etc): Spent the past week delivering Biden signs around the Birmingham/Bloomfield area of Oakland County, MI...one of the white, affluent, college educated, historically GOP suburbs which shifted blue HARD in 2018. 1/
In 2008, the B'ham/Blfld. area went for McCain over Obama by 3.8 points (51.4% to 47.6%).
In 2012, it went for Romney by over 16 points over Obama...but again, this is Romney's hometown.
In 2016, they went for Hillary over Trump...but only by 2.5 points (48.8% to 46.3%). 3/
As I noted in my 2016 postmortem, Hillary's "suburban college-educated white women will be disgusted by Trump" approach *DID* work to some degree...just not by enough:
"I saw a *lot* of Trump signs in front of million-dollar McMansions while out canvassing." 4/
In 2018, everything Hillary had HOPED would happen in 2016 *did* happen in affluent suburbs like B'ham/Blfld and around the country: The suburbs flipped a BUNCH of races blue. In our area, we not only elected Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel, Jocelyn Benson & Debbie Stabenow... 5/
With all this as backstory, what's the situation today? Well, again, signs don't vote/anecdotal only, AND we're still over 2 months out from election day (some communities don't let you put signs out more than 30 days before election day). HAVING SAID ALL THAT... 7/
...as of yesterday, in addition to the 130+ Biden signs which I've personally delivered to private residences, I've seen several dozen other Biden signs scattered around the B'ham/Blfld region as well.
Number of Trump signs I've seen so far? Zero. None. Zilch. 8/
Again, it's still early. Perhaps they haven't been delivered yet. Perhaps they'll post them later. Perhaps they're just too embarrassed/afraid of the stigma to put theirs out.
I *have* seen a handful of John James signs (he's the GOP Senate candidate running vs. Gary Peters). 9/
AGAIN, none of this means a damned thing. A week from now hundreds of Trump signs might have popped up around the area as well. If so, that'd just mean Biden got theirs delivered a couple weeks earlier than Trump (shrug).
But it was heartening for a brief moment, anyway. /END
(and if you live in Birmingham, Bloomfield Hills, Bloomfield Township, Beverly Hills, Bingham Farms or Franklin Village, I might even deliver it personally!)
While I'm at it, you can help Oakland County Democrats by donating to some of their races here as well! secure.actblue.com/donate/blueoak…
Here's an updated version of my "Dem Stop the Steal!" conspiracy theory thread which hopefully is less scattershot.
There's 3 main claims:
1. "How could there be 20M fewer voters than in 2020 w/"record-breaking turnout?"
2. "How could 15M fewer voter for Harris vs. Biden?"
3. "How could so many swing state voters vote for the Dem for Senate but not for Harris for POTUS?"
There's a few others, but these are the biggest ones, so let's tackle them first:
1. There weren't 20M fewer voters.
I've been compiling the data as it's being updated by CNN's tracking center via a Google spreadsheet. As of this writing, total POTUS turnout is ~147.6M, or ~10.8M lower than 2020's 158.4M.
Yesterday I posted a thread digging into the actual data behind the "20M missing votes!" and "15M fewer than Biden!" conspiracy theories being tossed around the past few days.
Via CNN, as of this writing, total 2024 POTUS votes are only down 13.9 million vs. 2020...with a likely 11.5 - 12.0 million ballots still to be counted across 30 states.
Total 2024 turnout will likely be ~156M or so...just a couple million fewer than 2020.
Again, using CNN's data & estimates, once every legitimate ballot has been counted, Trump will likely have around ~78 million votes to Harris' 75-76 million.
That'd mean he added ~4 million vs 2020 while she lost ~5-6 million.
...the vast majority of this discrepancy happened in districts/counties which were heavily red to begin with, which is why the MAGA COVID Death Cult factor only ended up making a decisive difference in exactly one statewide race: Arizona Attorney General: acasignups.net/22/12/29/updat…
At the House district level it didn't make a decisive difference in any races at all. To understand why, let's look at two extreme examples...
People have started asking why I'm still pushing fundraising for Dems just 5 days before Election Day. All the ad time has been purchased & the lit pieces printed & mailed out already, right?
There's several reasons: 1/
1. For state legislative races in particular, a last-minute cash infusion of even $50 can mean an extra few pizzas for tired & hungry canvassers or an extra burner phone for phone banking.
2. After the polls close, there's going to no doubt be some races which require recounts...which may or may not have to be paid for by the campaign requesting it, depending on the state and the margin. That's gonna cost money.
🧵THE DEAD POOL: Since @MikeJohnson and @JDVance are promising to Concentrate folks w/pre-existing conditions into separate Camps, let's talk about that. 1/ acasignups.net/24/10/04/dead-…
Let's go back to the pre-ACA healthcare landscape. This is what it looked like in 2012...*before* the ACA's major provisions went into effect.
Half the US had employer coverage. Another third had Medicare or Medicaid. ~11M had "individual" insurance; ~48M had nothing at all. 2/
The ACA had 2 main goals:
1. Reduce the number of uninsured Americans as much as possible by making coverage more affordable & accessible;
2. Provide protections from insurance industry abuses, *especially* for the individual market where the abuses were the most blatant. 3/