LAWN SIGN REPORT (anecdotal, signs don't vote, etc etc): Spent the past week delivering Biden signs around the Birmingham/Bloomfield area of Oakland County, MI...one of the white, affluent, college educated, historically GOP suburbs which shifted blue HARD in 2018. 1/
In 2008, the B'ham/Blfld. area went for McCain over Obama by 3.8 points (51.4% to 47.6%).
In 2012, it went for Romney by over 16 points over Obama...but again, this is Romney's hometown.
In 2016, they went for Hillary over Trump...but only by 2.5 points (48.8% to 46.3%). 3/
As I noted in my 2016 postmortem, Hillary's "suburban college-educated white women will be disgusted by Trump" approach *DID* work to some degree...just not by enough:
"I saw a *lot* of Trump signs in front of million-dollar McMansions while out canvassing." 4/
In 2018, everything Hillary had HOPED would happen in 2016 *did* happen in affluent suburbs like B'ham/Blfld and around the country: The suburbs flipped a BUNCH of races blue. In our area, we not only elected Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel, Jocelyn Benson & Debbie Stabenow... 5/
With all this as backstory, what's the situation today? Well, again, signs don't vote/anecdotal only, AND we're still over 2 months out from election day (some communities don't let you put signs out more than 30 days before election day). HAVING SAID ALL THAT... 7/
...as of yesterday, in addition to the 130+ Biden signs which I've personally delivered to private residences, I've seen several dozen other Biden signs scattered around the B'ham/Blfld region as well.
Number of Trump signs I've seen so far? Zero. None. Zilch. 8/
Again, it's still early. Perhaps they haven't been delivered yet. Perhaps they'll post them later. Perhaps they're just too embarrassed/afraid of the stigma to put theirs out.
I *have* seen a handful of John James signs (he's the GOP Senate candidate running vs. Gary Peters). 9/
AGAIN, none of this means a damned thing. A week from now hundreds of Trump signs might have popped up around the area as well. If so, that'd just mean Biden got theirs delivered a couple weeks earlier than Trump (shrug).
But it was heartening for a brief moment, anyway. /END
(and if you live in Birmingham, Bloomfield Hills, Bloomfield Township, Beverly Hills, Bingham Farms or Franklin Village, I might even deliver it personally!)
While I'm at it, you can help Oakland County Democrats by donating to some of their races here as well! secure.actblue.com/donate/blueoak…
🧵 People have asked me why I started an organized project to raise money *directly* for Democratic candidates up & down the ballot when there's already so many other organizations out there doing this. There's a couple of reasons. 1/
The first is that most of the existing organizations/PACs/etc seem to (in my view) *either* focus ONLY on the true swing districts *or* they raise money for races which are clearly unwinnable without being up front about how long the odds in those races are. 2/
I try to walk the line between these--for district-level races I cast my net wider than most "tossup only!" advocates, but not absurdly wide; for statewide races I *do* include deep red states but also make it absolutely clear that those races are *very* long shots. 3/
A little fun Die Hard trivia for those who don’t know:
The first Die Hard was based on a 1979 novel called Nothing Lasts Forever by Roderick Thorp. In the novel McClain’s character was named Joe Leland. This was a sequel to a 1966 novel by Thorp called The Detective. 1/
The Detective had been made into a film starring Frank Sinatra as Joe Leland in 1968.
This means Bruce Willis plays the same character as Frank Sinatra.
In fact, the studio was contractually required to offer the role to Sinatra if he wanted it. Sinatra was 73 at the time.
As for the novel Nothing Lasts Forever (title since changed to “Die Hard”), it follows most of the same storyline and characters, but with a few VERY important differences…
How does the @nytimes know that these are actual federal officials who actually signed it if they did so “anonymously?”
Does that mean the Times is redacting their names? Or does it just say “signed, 400 officials” at the bottom of the letter?
@nytimes I’m not being snarky here—I can’t read the original NY Times article without a subscription; do they clarify how they verified that these 400 people actually are federal officials and that they did in fact sign off on the letter in it?
1. DON'T DELAY; #GETCOVERED BY *DECEMBER 15th* IF POSSIBLE!
#ACA Open Enrollment officially runs from 11/01/23 - 1/16/24, but if you want your coverage to start in JANUARY you only have until December 15th in most states!
Here's a table of the deadlines & when coverage starts for every state +DC (some may be extended at the last minute):