here is some information which shows the implausibility of main argument purporting to attribute DNC hack to Seth Rich using a thumb drive on the basis that copying speed was too rapid for internet (advocated by Bill Binney and VIPS and many others.) Look closely at latest dates 
2/ the copy speed argument is base on implied copying speed of Guccifer 2 documents in the Sept 2016 zipfile, in which thousands of documents had last modified date of July 5, 2016, which, together with cumulative size of documents, implied a copying speed that was
3/ "too fast" for internet uploading (hack), thus supposedly implying a thumb drive download on site by Seth Rich. Not all documents in the G2 zipfile have a July 5 timestamp. Documents contained in four zipfiles bear original timestamps between 2006 and 2011, even as unzipped.
4/ For ALL documents for which internal document dates are available (not just upload timestamp), the latest date is 2011, with thousands of documents being as old as 2005. And these are routine documentation.
5/ the documents in the Guccifer 2 Sept 2016 zipfile are not only very stale, but excruciatingly boring: documentation for ngp program; the 1928 files for "CNBC" don't contain revelations on the network but are uninformative null files.
6/ there is not a single document copied in the "too fast" July 5 copy that is of the faintest interest to anyone. There is no way that a DNC operative would have wasted his time copying this garbage.
7/ nor is there any reason why a skilful operative who had been watching individual keystrokes of DNC and DCCC operatives would have any interest in this obsolete not-even chickenfeed.
8/ and yet 2.8 GB of this obsolete garbage was copied or exfiltrated.
9/ to illustrate this: the second largest directory (documentation) contained 1550 files. ALL of them are routine documentation in html format e.g. example below.
