🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 Profile picture
Sep 3, 2020 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Do you think @TuckerCarlson knew the whole story about the salon lady?
Please, read these comments and responses. Unbelievable.
$64K question. How did this video of #NancyPelosi get out? That should have been the first question. This will not go well.
This is a perfect confluence of duplicity on the part of the guest and less-than-stellar cross-examination and vetting by @TuckerCarlson. And if you can’t see that I don’t want you on my production team.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸

🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LionelMedia

Jan 28
🧵1/ .@RealCandaceO. frames this episode as a cleanup operation on the public narrative around Charlie Kirk’s death and the power shift that followed. Her core claim is simple. If an organization depends on donor trust and raised massive money after a founder’s death, the public deserves transparency about who is running it and why.
2/ She announces a multi-part investigation into Erika Kirk and internal leadership dynamics. The backlash only strengthens her belief that something important is being avoided. Her point is blunt. You cannot preach truth and courage while demanding silence when leadership becomes controversial.
3/ Candace centers the episode on a Zoom call recorded shortly after Charlie’s memorial. Timing matters. Less than two weeks after his death, leadership messaging should reflect gravity. She argues the tone instead sounded upbeat and business-focused.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 16
Thread: The @RealCandaceO Paradox 🧵
1/10: "Candace Owens has lost it." That’s the mainstream headline after her recent claims about Charlie Kirk and "time travel." But if you look past the headlines, there’s a fascinating logic at play. Is she "crazy," or is she a pattern recognition specialist? Let’s dive in. 👇
2/10: The smoking gun: The Ingersoll Lockwood Books. In the 1890s, Lockwood wrote about a wealthy boy named Baron Trump who lived in "Castle Trump" and was guided by a man named "Don." Coincidence? Maybe. But it gets weirder. #CandaceOwens #TimeTravel
3/10: Lockwood’s 1896 book, The Last President, describes a populist outsider winning an election, leading to riots at the Fifth Avenue Hotel—the exact spot where Trump Tower stands today. The statistical probability of these specific names/locations is near zero. 📉
Read 10 tweets
Mar 20, 2022
When the signal is given that Zelenskyy is not valuable anymore as a choreographed caricature he will be ignored and ghosted faster than a hypersonic missile. It will be over with in the flash of an eye. And you know this is the shadow government MO ammo. But it was magic.
Shadow government behavioral scientists study precisely the momentum and percussion of social media trending fads and gimmicks. They have used social media platforms as laboratories to spin and direct focused attention. They know exactly how to craft tropes.
Zelenskyy was brilliant stagecrafting from the moment he made the transition from a suit to the battle green T-shirt. When he commenced his video tour all subsidiary governments assumed their positions and were ready to applaud even though they didn’t even understand why.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 19, 2022
Riyadh is inviting Xi Jinping for a state visit. Why does that matter? He hasn’t left China in two years. This is far more than symbolic. The balance of powers isn’t changing, they have changed. The great reset. MBS is not answering Biden‘s calls. The US is on the outs.
Expect the visit perhaps in May. And the parallels cannot be avoided with Trump’s visit in 2017, where he was warmly welcomed on his first foreign visit. Trump’s focus was rebuilding an old relationship. China’s visit is about starting a new one. Meanwhile Biden is AWOL.
Xi has reached out to Iran Israel UAE and Riyadh. China needs oil and will receive such uninterruptedly from Saudi Arabia, a country that does not like to be lectured by Biden. Joe ended US support for the war in Yemen. He declassified files linking MBS to Khashoggi‘s murder.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 19, 2022
The EU is the embodiment of irrelevant. The 27 countries comprising such enjoy a schizoid camaraderie. Western Europe believes in concession appeasement and doing absolutely nothing that could impede the smooth and continuous flow of Russian oil. Eastern Europe is different.
Western Europe is protected and buffered by geography. They are colonial by nature and have never felt the terror of invasion. Eastern Europe is taking the brunt of refugees. Their economies are weaker. They crave the notion of being tough. Of standing up to behemoths.
Look no further than Lithuania in their tough stance against China and Russia. This while Western Europe stares off in both disbelief and obliviousness. US media have no concern or interest in the European theater. But they will. Trust me. bnnbloomberg.ca/squeezed-lithu…
Read 5 tweets
Mar 18, 2022
Joe Biden was asked whether he thought Vladimir Putin was a war criminal. He answered no and then was nudged by his handlers, changed his mind on the spot, and then said yes. As usual most have no understanding of what a war criminal is under statutes treaties and protocol.
@PressSec immediately tried to clarify Biden’s seeming confusion by saying that he “spoke from the heart.” We are not sure at what point he spoke from his heart: when he disagreed or agreed with the idea of Putin being declared a war criminal.
The first question is statutory, how is the designation of war criminal determined. The @IntlCrimCourt defines it and Putin seems liable. But there’s a catch. Russia does not recognize the ICC’s jurisdiction. Neither does the US. But the Senate disagrees. reuters.com/world/us/us-se…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(