The Bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and Sanjiv Khanna begins hearing.
Counsel for the petitioner: Main grievance in the matter is that the main exam and the CBSE has not yet asserted why the compartment exam cannot be cancelled.
Petitioner: The students will ultimately come in the category of failed students since exams will not be able to be conducted by September and the students will not be able to apply for further studies.
Advocate Rupesh Kumar for CBSE: We have increased the centres for compartment exams to 1278. We have taken a decision that in a class where 40 students could sit, now only 12 will sit. We are taking all precautions.
CJI Surya Kant: Is it possible for this court to look at all polluted rivers? We can look at it one by one. We also keep entertaining so many matters and issue directions. .. we also have to see that we entertain matters together. Why to have a multiplicity of issues like this ?
CJI: These suo motu proceedings were initiated by this court pursuant to an order in 2021. The original matter dealt with increased level of pollution in Yamuna river...which led this court to take suo motu cognizance of polluting rivers with sewage affluents. This court considered due to contamination of River Yamuna.. it should be the first issue dealt with. Notices were issued to Uttarakhand, Haryana, Himachal, UP and Delhi and Union of India. There is no gainsaid that Right to live in hygienic conditions with human dignity with clean environment is embodied in Article 21.
CJI: Effect of pollution of water on human health drew attention of this court. Under the legislative scheme (water), CPCB and the SPCB were statutorily obligated to take all necessary measures to ensure that sewage affluent is not discharged into rivers unless it is completely treated and will not deteriorate the quality of water.
#SupremeCourt to hear petitions assailing the #SIR process in West Bengal
Development: Following SC's recent order for deployment of judicial officers to ensure completion of SIR in WB the Calcutta HC has decided to cancel the leaves of all judicial officers @MamataOfficial
CJI Kant: Chief Justice of HC has sent a report. The total human resource deployed is shown. He says there is not much resources.. around 226 retired officers and after adding some more it's 294. Now going by the calculation.. if one officer decides 250 objections.. then it will take 80 days. All servicing civil judges will also be permitted now. That is the way out. Retired officers and serving ones from Odisha and Jharkhand will also be added now.
Sr Adv Kalyan Banerjee: Only NDPS and POCSO court judges have been requisitioned and not the civil judges. If judges from different states come they will not understand Bengali.
CJI: let us go by History. Atleast the states were a part of it at one point of time. So they understand the dialect atleast
#BREAKING : Supreme Court comes down hard on the probe in the 2022 murder case against YSRCP MLC Ananta Uday Bhaskar
CJI Surya Kant: “This is a clear casr of the nexus of Police and power. Police, investigating agencies have been hobnobbing with the accused and all attempts have been made to grant default bail under 167(2) CrPC to the appellant on a platter…”
#SupremeCourt
CJI Surya Kant: Police, investigating agencies have been hobnobbing with the accused and all attempts have been made to grant default bail under 167(2) crpc to the appellant on a platter though HC did not grant the same.
Thus this appeal. He is enjoying interim bail from the last two years.
CJI: Senior Advocate Luthra informs that a supplementary chargesheet has been filed which shows laxity if not complicity with the state police with the accused exhibiting the grossest negligence in the matter of investigation of a heinous offence. In order to strike balance between right to liberty and right to fair trial.
Supreme Court to hear petitions seeking the registration of FIR into instances of alleged communal speeches attributed to Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and a social media post, since deleted, depicting him discharging a firearm toward an animated image of two Muslim men @himantabiswa #SupremeCourt
SG Tushar Mehta: There is a factual development
Passover sought as Sr Adv AM Singhvi is in another court
Matter to be taken up shortly
CJI: call him
CJI: why have you not gone to the HC unless HC also has become a ground for political battle.
Singhvi: this affects the fundamental rights under Article 14,15 and 21. If this case cannot come here then this court has to determine what is the contour of article 32. We are seeking a SIT and what SIT in Assam can do against Boss of Assam. There is a list of 17 cases before you where have ordered this in much weaker.
CJI: We will ask political parties to use restraint and be within the boundaries of constitutional morality. But this is becoming a trend just before the elections.
Singhvi: he is a habitual and repeated offender. This would be the ideal case for SC to exercise it's article 32 power. There are examples of Bilkis Rasool , Vinod Dua etc.
Supreme Court is set to examine the Union Government's status report on the "Digital Arrest" cyber fraud epidemic
Top cout will review the coordination between the MHA, RBI, and telecom authorities to curb transnational syndicates targeting Indian citizens #SupremeCourt
In a connected case, CJI Kant remarks "we have seen bank officials are completely hand in gloves with the accused in these cases of digital arrest"
AG R Venkataramani places status report on record
CJI: there are senior citizens.. there was a retired couple. Their entire life savings went away.
AG: Rajasthan and Kerala HC judgments are exhaustive. SOP for now is fairly comprehensive
Supreme Court takes up suggestions seeking sweeping reforms in SCBA elections, including reservation for members with disabilities, 50% relaxation in eligibility norms, rotational representation for women, and inclusion of gender neutrality and ability inclusion as core objectives of the Bar Association
#SupremeCourt #SCBA #BarReforms
CJI Surya Kant: Please give all the suggestions to Adv Pragya Baghel.
CJI to Adv Sneha Kalita: As a woman member, as an AoR and as someone seeking empowerment.
Sr Adv Vijay Hansaria: Suggestion by Ms Kalita on reservation for differently abled is praiseworthy
CJI: yes we will make sure that and we are under an obligation to create the infrastructure for the same.
Adv Kalita: 76 years has passed and we still do not have a woman present of the Supreme Court Bar
. I am stressing on the point of rotational representation
Another woman lawyer: no no that cannot be. It has to be on merit.
CJI: environment created should not look like one is completely dependant for the post. Everytime one cannot depend on reservation