Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 4, 2020 14 tweets 8 min read Read on X
CBSE COMPARTMENT EXAMS:

Supreme Court will take up for hearing today petition challenging the CBSE notification of August 6 for holding of compartment exams.

#SupremeCourt @cbseindia29
#compartmentexam2020 Image
The petition challenges the notification on the grounds that holding of these exams would be detrimental to the health of the students.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia @cbseindia29 #compartmentexam2020
The Bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and Sanjiv Khanna begins hearing.
Counsel for the petitioner: Main grievance in the matter is that the main exam and the CBSE has not yet asserted why the compartment exam cannot be cancelled.
Petitioner: The students will ultimately come in the category of failed students since exams will not be able to be conducted by September and the students will not be able to apply for further studies.

#SupremeCourt #compartmentexam2020
SC asks petitioner for clarity on the prayer sought

SC: Without the exams, where do you stand? Is there a scheme by CBSE?

#SupremeCourtOfIndia #compartmentexam2020
Petitioner: The main exam was not conducted so why can there not be a scheme to cancel compartment exams.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia #compartmentexam2020 @cbseindia29
Advocate Rupesh Kumar for CBSE: We have increased the centres for compartment exams to 1278. We have taken a decision that in a class where 40 students could sit, now only 12 will sit. We are taking all precautions.

#SupremeCourt #compartmentexam2020
SC: Have the exam dates been fixed?

Kumar: The notification is expected to come out today and the exams are likely to be in September only.
Supreme Court asks when the exams are proposed.

Kumar: End of September.

#SupremeCourt #compartmentexam2020 @cbseindia29
Supreme Court to hear the case on September 10 and asks CBSE to file a short affidavit

#SupremeCourt #compartmentexam2020 @cbseindia29
Petitioner points out that admissions in Universities will close by the time the exams are conducted.

Kumar for CBSE says that on the one hand petitioners want cancellation of exams and then also raise grievance of admissions.

#SupremeCourt #compartmentexam2020 @cbseindia29
Supreme Court fixes the date for hearing on September 10.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia @cbseindia29 #compartmentexam2020
Compartment exams to be held by end of September, number of centres increased: CBSE tells Supreme Court [Read full story] #SupremeCourtOfIndia #CBSECompartmentExam2020 #ExamsInCovid @cbseindia29

bit.ly/31UEIei

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Feb 24
Suo Motu: Remediation of Polluted Rivers

CJI Surya Kant: Is it possible for this court to look at all polluted rivers? We can look at it one by one. We also keep entertaining so many matters and issue directions. .. we also have to see that we entertain matters together. Why to have a multiplicity of issues like this ?Image
CJI: These suo motu proceedings were initiated by this court pursuant to an order in 2021. The original matter dealt with increased level of pollution in Yamuna river...which led this court to take suo motu cognizance of polluting rivers with sewage affluents. This court considered due to contamination of River Yamuna.. it should be the first issue dealt with. Notices were issued to Uttarakhand, Haryana, Himachal, UP and Delhi and Union of India. There is no gainsaid that Right to live in hygienic conditions with human dignity with clean environment is embodied in Article 21.
CJI: Effect of pollution of water on human health drew attention of this court. Under the legislative scheme (water), CPCB and the SPCB were statutorily obligated to take all necessary measures to ensure that sewage affluent is not discharged into rivers unless it is completely treated and will not deteriorate the quality of water.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 24
#SupremeCourt to hear petitions assailing the #SIR process in West Bengal

Development: Following SC's recent order for deployment of judicial officers to ensure completion of SIR in WB the Calcutta HC has decided to cancel the leaves of all judicial officers @MamataOfficial Image
CJI Kant: Chief Justice of HC has sent a report. The total human resource deployed is shown. He says there is not much resources.. around 226 retired officers and after adding some more it's 294. Now going by the calculation.. if one officer decides 250 objections.. then it will take 80 days. All servicing civil judges will also be permitted now. That is the way out. Retired officers and serving ones from Odisha and Jharkhand will also be added now.
Sr Adv Kalyan Banerjee: Only NDPS and POCSO court judges have been requisitioned and not the civil judges. If judges from different states come they will not understand Bengali.

CJI: let us go by History. Atleast the states were a part of it at one point of time. So they understand the dialect atleast
Read 14 tweets
Feb 20
#BREAKING : Supreme Court comes down hard on the probe in the 2022 murder case against YSRCP MLC Ananta Uday Bhaskar

CJI Surya Kant: “This is a clear casr of the nexus of Police and power. Police, investigating agencies have been hobnobbing with the accused and all attempts have been made to grant default bail under 167(2) CrPC to the appellant on a platter…”
#SupremeCourtImage
CJI Surya Kant: Police, investigating agencies have been hobnobbing with the accused and all attempts have been made to grant default bail under 167(2) crpc to the appellant on a platter though HC did not grant the same.
Thus this appeal. He is enjoying interim bail from the last two years.
CJI: Senior Advocate Luthra informs that a supplementary chargesheet has been filed which shows laxity if not complicity with the state police with the accused exhibiting the grossest negligence in the matter of investigation of a heinous offence. In order to strike balance between right to liberty and right to fair trial.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 16
Supreme Court to hear petitions seeking the registration of FIR into instances of alleged communal speeches attributed to Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and a social media post, since deleted, depicting him discharging a firearm toward an animated image of two Muslim men @himantabiswa #SupremeCourtImage
SG Tushar Mehta: There is a factual development

Passover sought as Sr Adv AM Singhvi is in another court

Matter to be taken up shortly

CJI: call him
CJI: why have you not gone to the HC unless HC also has become a ground for political battle.

Singhvi: this affects the fundamental rights under Article 14,15 and 21. If this case cannot come here then this court has to determine what is the contour of article 32. We are seeking a SIT and what SIT in Assam can do against Boss of Assam. There is a list of 17 cases before you where have ordered this in much weaker.

CJI: We will ask political parties to use restraint and be within the boundaries of constitutional morality. But this is becoming a trend just before the elections.

Singhvi: he is a habitual and repeated offender. This would be the ideal case for SC to exercise it's article 32 power. There are examples of Bilkis Rasool , Vinod Dua etc.
Read 12 tweets
Feb 9
Supreme Court is set to examine the Union Government's status report on the "Digital Arrest" cyber fraud epidemic

Top cout will review the coordination between the MHA, RBI, and telecom authorities to curb transnational syndicates targeting Indian citizens #SupremeCourt Image
In a connected case, CJI Kant remarks "we have seen bank officials are completely hand in gloves with the accused in these cases of digital arrest"
AG R Venkataramani places status report on record

CJI: there are senior citizens.. there was a retired couple. Their entire life savings went away.

AG: Rajasthan and Kerala HC judgments are exhaustive. SOP for now is fairly comprehensive
Read 10 tweets
Feb 6
Supreme Court takes up suggestions seeking sweeping reforms in SCBA elections, including reservation for members with disabilities, 50% relaxation in eligibility norms, rotational representation for women, and inclusion of gender neutrality and ability inclusion as core objectives of the Bar Association
#SupremeCourt #SCBA #BarReformsImage
CJI Surya Kant: Please give all the suggestions to Adv Pragya Baghel.

CJI to Adv Sneha Kalita: As a woman member, as an AoR and as someone seeking empowerment.

Sr Adv Vijay Hansaria: Suggestion by Ms Kalita on reservation for differently abled is praiseworthy

CJI: yes we will make sure that and we are under an obligation to create the infrastructure for the same.
Adv Kalita: 76 years has passed and we still do not have a woman present of the Supreme Court Bar
. I am stressing on the point of rotational representation

Another woman lawyer: no no that cannot be. It has to be on merit.

CJI: environment created should not look like one is completely dependant for the post. Everytime one cannot depend on reservation
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(