Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 4, 2020 14 tweets 8 min read Read on X
CBSE COMPARTMENT EXAMS:

Supreme Court will take up for hearing today petition challenging the CBSE notification of August 6 for holding of compartment exams.

#SupremeCourt @cbseindia29
#compartmentexam2020 Image
The petition challenges the notification on the grounds that holding of these exams would be detrimental to the health of the students.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia @cbseindia29 #compartmentexam2020
The Bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and Sanjiv Khanna begins hearing.
Counsel for the petitioner: Main grievance in the matter is that the main exam and the CBSE has not yet asserted why the compartment exam cannot be cancelled.
Petitioner: The students will ultimately come in the category of failed students since exams will not be able to be conducted by September and the students will not be able to apply for further studies.

#SupremeCourt #compartmentexam2020
SC asks petitioner for clarity on the prayer sought

SC: Without the exams, where do you stand? Is there a scheme by CBSE?

#SupremeCourtOfIndia #compartmentexam2020
Petitioner: The main exam was not conducted so why can there not be a scheme to cancel compartment exams.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia #compartmentexam2020 @cbseindia29
Advocate Rupesh Kumar for CBSE: We have increased the centres for compartment exams to 1278. We have taken a decision that in a class where 40 students could sit, now only 12 will sit. We are taking all precautions.

#SupremeCourt #compartmentexam2020
SC: Have the exam dates been fixed?

Kumar: The notification is expected to come out today and the exams are likely to be in September only.
Supreme Court asks when the exams are proposed.

Kumar: End of September.

#SupremeCourt #compartmentexam2020 @cbseindia29
Supreme Court to hear the case on September 10 and asks CBSE to file a short affidavit

#SupremeCourt #compartmentexam2020 @cbseindia29
Petitioner points out that admissions in Universities will close by the time the exams are conducted.

Kumar for CBSE says that on the one hand petitioners want cancellation of exams and then also raise grievance of admissions.

#SupremeCourt #compartmentexam2020 @cbseindia29
Supreme Court fixes the date for hearing on September 10.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia @cbseindia29 #compartmentexam2020
Compartment exams to be held by end of September, number of centres increased: CBSE tells Supreme Court [Read full story] #SupremeCourtOfIndia #CBSECompartmentExam2020 #ExamsInCovid @cbseindia29

bit.ly/31UEIei

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Jun 19
Delhi High Court to shortly pronounce its judgment in a plea filed by Telegram challenging the ban on the platform till June 22 in view of the NEET exams.

Justice Tejas Karia to pass orders at 10:30 AM.

#Telegram @telegram @durov Image
The Court had reserved its verdict yesterday after hearing arguments from Telegram's lawyer, Senior Advocate Dhruv Mehta, and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for the Central government.

Read the detailed story here:

barandbench.com/news/how-can-w…
Order: After considering all the arguments, we find that given the emergency nature, the reasons supplied are sufficient and government has followed the procedure in Section 69A. The challenge ont eh ground of non supply of reasons can't be held. Both the orders are well founded and supported by reasons. The orders do not suffer from non application of mind. We have also held that under IT Act there is no reason to excluse the platform fromt he admit of "information".
Read 6 tweets
Jun 18
[Sabarimala gold theft case] Kerala High Court today recorded that the SIT has gathered “substantial and convincing materials” indicating the involvement of the accused in transactions relating to the removal and gold-plating of the Dwarapalaka idols in 2025. Image
Division Bench of  Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V and Justice KV Jayakumar were informed by the SIT today that the investigation has reached its final stages. Image
The SIT also told the Court that it is examining the alleged criminal conspiracy behind the transactions and the role of certain Travancore Devaswom Board officials who held responsible positions at Sabarimala during the relevant period.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 18
Delhi High Court to hear today Telegram's challenge to the government order banning the platform till the NEET UG exams.

Justice Tejas Karia to hear the matter at 2:30 PM.
@telegram @durov @GoI_MeitY Image
On June 17, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had asked for time to file a reply to Telegram's plea.

Mehta had said there were shocking activities on the platform and that despite repeated communication, Telegram failed to act.

Telegram opposed the argument and said it acted proactively to take down the content.
Read detailed story on yesterday's proceedings here:

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Read 69 tweets
Jun 11
#BREAKING Sheetal Thakur vs Dhiraj Abraham

Supreme Court says Family Courts should ordinarily assess parents first and decide whether psychological evaluation of a child is necessary before directing such evaluation; lays down safeguards against unnecessary psychological assessment of children in custody and visitation disputes.Image
Justice N Kotiswar Singh:

• Family Courts must first appoint a psychologist to assess the psychological condition of both parents, particularly the parent having present custody of the child, before deciding whether any psychological assessment of the child is required.

• No psychological assessment of the child should be conducted if the Family Court, based on the psychologist's report, finds such assessment unnecessary or undesirable.

• If an assessment of the child is required, it must be carried out by an independent child psychologist in consultation with the psychologist already treating the child, with minimum interaction so as not to disturb the child's mental condition.

• Family Courts must remain conscious that a child's psychological needs change with age and may require periodic review and assessment.

• Courts must examine concerns relating to parental alienation syndrome and false memory creation against the other parent, while ensuring the child is not exposed to influences that may foster such tendencies.
Justice N Kotiswar Singh :

• We emphasise our role as parens patriae and held that child custody, visitation and parental access disputes involving growing children are dynamic in nature and constitute a continuing cause of action.

• Parents are at liberty to seek modification of orders before the Family Court from time to time as circumstances evolve.

• Parties must apprise the Family Court of the status of proceedings pending under the POCSO Act against the respondent, as those proceedings may significantly affect decisions concerning visitation and custody rights.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 8
"Delhi will choke. God save us all if this is how you want Delhi to live."

Delhi High Court makes strong remarks over the Central government's plans to take over properties in the Lutyen's Delhi area, including the Delhi Gymkhana Club and the Polo Ground.

#DelhiGymkhanaClub Image
Justice Neena Bansal Krishna made the remarks while hearing a plea filed by the Indian Polo Association over the government's eviction notice.
The Court said that green spaces in Delhi were anyways scarce and the "little green space" remaining in the NDMC area is also being taken over.

The Court questioned if the government is plannig to make high rises in the area.

"Little breather we have in the NDMC area is also gonna go and all of us are going to suffocate and die," the Bench remarked.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 8
#Breaking
“It’s not a small matter and not a standalone case.”

Delhi High Court orders removal of videos on social media platforms calling a sitting High Court judge "murderer" and blaming him for the death of 6 people in a building collapse in Saket on May 30.

Court passed the order after Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) filed a criminal contempt petition.

#Contempt #CriminalContemptImage
The videos were uploaded by a person named Dr Kapil Kakar, who claims to be a psychologist and social activist.

He is also stated to be the maker of a series called 'Black Justice'.
A Division Bench of Justices Neena Bansal Krishna and Madhu Jain passed the order.

The Court examined the videos and stated that instances like these were becoming very regular and coming regularly.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(