@OdysseanProject is fizzing with ideas about how to turn the UK into an innovation powerhouse.
Although realising these objectives is possible under EU State aid rules, creating a UK State aid regime is an opportunity to imbed these ideas within the subsidy award process.
Block exemptions are used for over 95% of all State aid awards.
The EU uses some economic data when designing block exemptions.
The UK could put data at the heart of the process to ensure subsidies are directed towards the most productive activities.
The State aid rules help protect public money.
For example, under State aid law information about awards of public funding is published, rather than being kept secret. This helps avoid #cronyism.
It’s important to keep such rules in a UK State aid regime.
There are strong reasons for the UK to establish robust and effective State aid rules.
Therefore the Times is right to point out that the UK has taken an inconsistent position on this issue during negotiations & to call upon Boris Johnson to stop prevaricating.
/End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Teesworks report terms of reference pointedly do not cover the State aid / Subsidy Control compliance of the deals.
This matters because a transaction found to breach such law is capable of being set aside - potentially saving the taxpayer millions of pounds.
A short 🧵…
This is surprising given such areas of law are central to assessing regularity and propriety according to the Treasury’s “Managing Public Money” guidance.
Had the report cast doubt on the transactions, for example:
• that the transfer of 90% of the shares; or
• the transfer of the 110 acres described below
was not a commercial transaction, that would be helpful evidence in the event of a challenge brought by a competitor.
The UK Shared Prosperity Fund launches today - here’s a quick 🧵 on the main issues.
1) the Conservative Party manifesto committed to setting up the UKSPF to replace EU funds lost to Brexit and that it would as “a minimum match the size of those funds in each nation”.
1/4
2) EU funds would have invested £10.85bn in the UK’s regions between 2021 and 2027, but the Government’s replacement fund has a much lower value.
A short 🧵 about the transparency flaw in the UK Subsidy Control regime.
I flagged this issue at a recent Select Committee appearance, but so far no steps have been taken to fix this.
Which is a big concern, because it affects how unlawful subsidies can be challenged…
1/4
Under the current Subsidy Control regime, a business can challenge an unlawful subsidy to a rival by going to court.
However a challenge must be brought in a short window that only starts when information about the subsidy is published on the national transparency website.
2/4
Yet the national transparency database is set up in such a way that key information is not available.
This award was posted in late October 2021, but there’s no way for a potential challenger to discover this.
The Subsidy Control Bill has its second reading in Parliament tomorrow providing MPs with their first opportunity to debate the principles of this important piece of post-#Brexit legislation.
In this 🧵 I set out the main issues to look out for…
The European Commission has published a notice which pushes back on the UK government’s interpretation of when State aid law will apply under the Northern Ireland Protocol.
Is the honeymoon over? Will the EU start challenging UK subsidies?
You’ll recall that on 31 December, @beisgovuk published guidance on the new Subsidy Control regime.
The Northern Ireland Protocol section took a surprisingly robust approach to interpreting when EU State aid law needs to be applied and when it doesn’t.
Some of this was supported by the contents of a joint statement between the UK and EU, but crucially the words “liable to have an effect on trade” were downplayed.