For my M.S. thesis, I studied ways to disrupt #biofilms - individual bacteria cells that come together & form a community that is up to 1000 times more resistant to antibiotics!
Biofilm formation is kind of like when 10 individual people (bacteria cells) come together & tightly lock arms to form a group (biofilm). You can imagine, it's much harder to knock over a group of 10 people than 1 person by them self. This is how bacteria mobilize under stress.
Biofilms are a perfect example of how diverse communities thrive. The cells in a biofilm are all doing different things to ensure survival.
I asked the question - how is biofilm formation regulated? Can we genetically manipulate bacteria to change how biofilms form?
Here's an example of this question (how are biofilms regulated?) in an experiment
Far Left: A normal, healthy E. coli biofilm
Every other row: Deleting/changing essential genes needed for biofilm formation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/Our findings suggest that student evaluations of teaching seem to measure *conformity with gendered expectations* rather than teaching quality
A cause for concern given the integration of SET data into performance profiles, and management and organisation of teaching practice
3/Before I go on, in terms of the necessarily binary reporting, it is very important to say here that we recognise the ‘pluralities inherent in gender(s)’ that complicate simple binary approaches to gender (Weerawardhana, 2018, p.189), and we do discuss this in the paper
On important background, in March 2020 the IOC recognised harassment and abuse as a current human rights challenge, and in particular recognised that LGBTQI+ athletes are at “particular risk of harm and structural discrimination”
3/n
The IOC now recognise female eligibility regulation *as an organisational violence issue* and as systemic discrimination
[I'll do another tweet thread on this later, drawing on my own research on this]
I want to address a narrative that we see around women’s sport and inclusion (particularly from those who seek to exclude trans women & women with sex variations from women’s sport), and how this narrative is part of a bigger pattern that functions to keep women small
2/n
I have been hearing more frequently the narrative that women's sport apparently exists as a 'protected category' so that women can win (because, on this account, without it no woman will ever win again)
3/n
This is:
a) *not* the reason why women's sport exists as a category,
and b) it is *not* true that no woman will ever win again.
This narrative is profoundly paternalistic and keeps women small.