(THREAD) Little has been written on Trump-Turkey collusion, which pervaded the 2016 election and runs through Trump's presidency—a quid pro quo of U.S. policy for personal benefits granted to Trump by Erdogan—which is why I wrote about it in Proof of Corruption. Read on for more.
1/ Trump had two Turkish agents—literally, men working on behalf of the Turkish government—on his national security team during the 2016 election season: Giuliani and Flynn. Both men were in contact with the Turkish government as they advised Trump on sensitive matters.
2/ Meanwhile, Roger Stone—Trump's top off-campaign adviser—was dealing, like Flynn, with intelligence elements within both the Israeli and Turkish governments (his emails said a "Lieutenant General" was involved). Stone was seeking an "October surprise" from Turkish intelligence.
3/ During his presidency Trump has illicitly intervened in a string of federal investigations to aid Turkish president Erdogan, even though Trump has publicly said that he has a "conflict of interest" in setting U.S. policy in Turkey because of his own business interests there.
4/ Trump's former National Security Advisor, John Bolton, says Trump's interference in this string of federal investigations was done to further Trump's own personal and pecuniary relationships, not to aid or protect the United States. That itself would be an impeachable offense.
5/ The Turkey-related federal investigations that Trump is known to have interfered in include (but likely are not limited to):

🔹 The ZARRAB case: Trump protects Turkey's evasion of US sanctions.
🔹 The GULEN case: Trump tries to extradite a US resident to be killed by Erdogan.
6/ But that's not all. Also:

🔹 The HALKBANK case: Trump protects a Turkish bank connected to the criminal evasion of US sanctions.
🔹 The RUSSIAN MISSILE case: Trump aids Erdogan's efforts to conduct sensitive military deals with the Kremlin (thus aiding Vladimir Putin, too).
7/ Did Donald Trump know that in fall 2016—pre-election, as his friend and adviser Stone was seeking Turkish intelligence to aid Trump—his other top adviser, Flynn, was both talking about kidnapping a US resident for Erdogan *and* (apparently) working with Stone? It seems likely.
8/ We know Trump would sacrifice *anything*—including even aiding Iran in escaping US sanctions (which is what Erdogan was doing in the ZARRAB and HALKBANK cases)—to protect his Turkish business interests. But it's worse than even that: he would endanger the lives of US soldiers.
9/ Against the advice of all the Republicans in Congress—as well as his entire military advisory corps—Trump withdrew US soldiers from Syria on Erdogan's command. And that's the right word: it was a "command." Trump appeared to be as much an agent of Turkey as Flynn or Giuliani.
10/ That withdrawal *again* aided Russia—as it gave Putin many of our Syrian bases. It *also* led to the escape of tens of thousands of ISIS prisoners—who US soldiers will now have to fight *again*. It *also* led to our soldiers being shelled... *by Erdogan*. It disgraced the US.
CONCLUSION/ Many Americans think they know all there is to know about Trump's collusive acts in 2016, during his presidency, and in 2020.

Whether you read Proof of Corruption or not, I need you to know: you don't know all that happened. Not even 10%. It's worse than you believe.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

10 Sep
(IMPORTANT) I have something I must say, but I must say it carefully and ethically because I teach journalism, believe in journalism, and believe journalists must respect their roles. What I have to say will take a few tweets, but at the end you'll see it's important. Nationally.
(1) I am a curatorial journalist—a metajournalist. I compile, curate, and connect reliable major-media investigative reporting from around the world and going back decades. I do that job ethically. I am not a reporter. I do not wish to be a reporter. I will not become a reporter.
(2) Since I began writing the Proof series, I have been inundated with leads. Requests to connect by encrypted messaging. 99% of these were clearly dead ends, but it didn't matter because—again—I'm a curatorial journalist, not a reporter. And I told those who contacted me that.
Read 24 tweets
10 Sep
As predicted, the net effect of reports on the Woodward tapes has been as much a boon to Trump as a detriment—as pieces like this one now *falsely* date Trump's knowledge of the virus' danger to when *Woodward* learned of it—not weeks or months *earlier*. cnn.com/2020/09/10/pol…
PS/ The same thing happened with FEAR, two years ago. Woodward—on the basis of his interviews and no other research—declared that there had been no collusion. The media ran with it, and it and Woodward were *wrong*. They're wrong now about when Trump learned of the virus' danger.
PS2/ As I detail based on major-media reporting in Proof of Corruption, the Trump White House learned all about the virus—*everything* it needed to know to take *immediate emergency action*—in November 2019, *three months* before CNN now reports Trump apprehended imminent danger.
Read 17 tweets
10 Sep
(AUDIOBOOK EXCLUSIVE) I've decided to make Chapter 1 of Proof of Corruption available on Twitter. My goal is for potential readers to understand how profoundly different from conventional nonfiction "curatorial journalism" is.

I hope you'll listen and RT.
(PS) All I ask of metajournalism skeptics is that you listen to one chapter—knowing that, while you can't see it (because you're listening to the audiobook) there's an endnote at the end of almost every sentence you're hearing that takes you to a major-media investigative report.
(PS2) If this audiobook exclusive garners enough interest, I'll keep releasing chapters here on Twitter, so that people can better understand how metajournalism works: how dense it is, how free of gossip or extraneous information, how focused *exclusively* on major breaking news.
Read 6 tweets
10 Sep
I'll bite.

✝️ You have this.
🔫 No one wants your small arms.
🇺🇸 Democrats are largely capitalists.
🚔 Weeding out bad cops isn't anti-police.
🇺🇸 Trump hates and endangers our troops.
🗣️ You have this.
🚧 Walls don't secure borders.
👶 OK.
🇺🇸 BS.
❤️ Trump is evil.
✝️ See above.
PS/ If a voter wants to throw away *every other issue*—like Trump killing 250,000 Americans in 6 months—because of the abortion question, there's nothing you can say to that voter. But every other "justification" for voting for Trump is a steaming turd pie of self-exonerating BS.
PS2/ None of us can stop our fellow Americans from knowingly voting for a monster who believes in *nothing* just to stop a moderate Democrat from occupying the White House. But what I can't stomach is such people pretending they don't hate what America stands for—because they do.
Read 6 tweets
9 Sep
I'm angry.

On March 19—when journalist and Pulitzer Prize winner Bob Woodward got a tape he had a moral obligation to share with America—we had only 3,351 COVID-19 cases and only 50 COVID-19 deaths.

Now we have 6,540,385 COVID-19 cases and 194,863 deaths.

*Fuck* Bob Woodward.
I'm an author who published a book on COVID-19 containing far more accurate and detailed info on the virus than Woodward, so I'll naturally be seen as jealous. No—it's that I *teach* journalism and ethics to university students and can't now unteach what Woodward has taught them.
What my students have been taught is that journalists don't owe moral obligations to their country in a time of crisis; they owe a duty to the publishers they publish with at great corporate/personal enrichment. They've been taught that winning an award guards you from criticism.
Read 12 tweets
9 Sep
If you believe the Trump tapes released today change something, I can't even *imagine* how angry you are that they weren't released back in mid-March—when they could've saved 100,000+ lives by revealing that the president was lying about the danger posed by the novel coronavirus.
PS/ Correction: Given how many people have died since Bob Woodward acquired these tapes in mid-March and sat on them for 6 months, the death toll after that decision is actually *190,000* people, not 100,000. I'm not sure how much their release *now* can actually be celebrated.
PS2/ I want to be intellectually consistent. I see there as being two possibilities: the tapes aren't really news and so it was OK to sit on them, or they're news and sitting on them was a despicable act that mustn't be rewarded. I'm actually inclined more toward the former view.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!