Share this page!

Simon Wardley Profile picture
Twitter logo
9 Sep, 7 tweets, 2 min read
I suspect most knew they were being lied to, they also knew that Corbyn was being smeared and lied about ... however they didn't care. They wanted a sense of belonging and that existed with the Conservative over leave. It was lies but lies you could "believe" in with others ->
... I also suspect this will become more norm going forward. For the time being, truth and integrity have become somewhat irrelevant in the political sphere. The key is that sense of belonging.
Boris understood this in a way that Jeremy didn't. Corbyn tried to build consensus hence the whole half in / half out remain fiasco rather than focusing on leave. Boris simply expelled dissenters and created a uniform view. It might be built upon nonsense but it's consistent.
X : "Lies you can believe in with others"
Me : Yes. From cults to religion, you're talking about beliefs, a group of people with shared beliefs (i.e. a collective) and that sense of belonging to the collective. There is no "truth" other than the shared beliefs.
You can't attack the shared belief (no matter how obviously false it is) without attacking the collective, the sense of belonging and the person's sense of individual identity within that. Lies can be powerful if a collective believes them - just take something like flat earth.
The issue for Corbyn was that he focused on consensus, a very socialist attitude. So he tried to find a common ground between opposing views. As a result, he might have maintained integrity but he just wasn't believable to many especially given the splits within his own party ...
... Boris on the other hand simply sold a story (we even had Dominic Grieve warning this), he removed dissenters and gave an image of a uniform collective with a belief in a specific direction. It's easier for people to belong to that.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Simon Wardley

Simon Wardley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @swardley

Simon Wardley Profile picture
3 Sep
X : One of our customers wants a new feature in our product.
Me : Sounds good. Add it to the backlog.
X : No other customer seems to want this. It's unique to them.
Me : Is it a generally useful feature that others might want?
X : I doubt it
Me : Then super low priority.
X : But they're willing to pay.
Me : Sure but that means taking resources of your priorities.
X : They're willing to pay a lot.
Me : More resources? Covering all the costs, now and in the future?
X : Yes
Me : Tell them it's a bad idea, try to persuade them not to.
X : They really want this.
Me : It seems you've already decided.
X : Yes. Any advice on how to manage this.
Me : Fairly easy, take a fork of the code base into a new repository. It's a new project. Work on it there. It'll need its own infrastructure, testing and support regime.
Read 15 tweets
Simon Wardley Profile picture
1 Sep
X : Thoughts on DevOps?
Me : Broad subject.
X : General trends?
Me : DevOps / IaaS is what you should have been doing over a decade ago. It's now in the position of becoming the new legacy. The smart kids have already gone serverless and the practices emerging around it. Why?
X : We're just about to embark on implementing DevOps and cloud.
Me : Not unusual. It's ahead of many. Some are still waking up to the existence of the internet / www - see digital transformation.
X : So, it's a good thing to do?
Me : No, it's daft but not as daft as some.
X : Do you have examples of ...
Me : Are you looking for reasons to justify your inertia? This is no different with cloud (IaaS) in 2011. The desire to go down a path of virtual data centres because of pre-existing assets and capital? It's why people like kubernetes.
Read 14 tweets
Simon Wardley Profile picture
28 Aug
X : Are you vaping?
Me : Yes.
X : It's unprofessional to vape in a meeting.
Me : I suspect that's a shibboleth.
X : A what?
Me : A dividing line between the digital natives and those who have never really felt comfortable about letting go off the office.
X : It's distracting.
Me : So is someone having a cup of coffee.
X : That's different.
Me : Ah, so you're arguing for "accepted norms". You invade the digital space and want it to conform to your idea of what are accepted norms do you? Try adapting.
... or maybe, we should demand suits and ties? Yes, my new boundary. If you're in a zoom meeting with me without a tweed jacket, check shirt, a pipe. plain white wall background, no guitar, no books and total conformity to my strict guidelines then you're unprofessional? Hmmm.
Read 12 tweets
Simon Wardley Profile picture
27 Aug
One of the many eye opening aspects of the isolation economy caused by COVID is watching so many "leaders" who have failed to adapt desperately try to get everyone back into the office as they watch their social power tumble in a virtual world ...
... they do not know how to act in this new world. Their physical prescence, their polish, their air of authority means nothing in the face of a generation who can create massive followings online. They are stripped bare to positional power and often found wanting.
It's amusing to watch the focus on symbols of status - a professionally designed background, a purpose built studio, an amazing microphone ... as if those acquired things will suddenly recreate that social power and enable massive followings ...
Read 7 tweets
Simon Wardley Profile picture
7 Aug
Leadership is not about benefit to yourself but duty to others. Those who forget this are not leaders, they are parasites. Sometimes the organism can get rid of the parasite, in other cases it can be fatal.
X : Thoughts on peactime vs wartime CEO?
Me : For over a decade I've talked about the peace, war and wonder cycle. All require a different attitude (hence pioneers, settlers, town planners) but any organisation will have functions at different stages at the same time ...
... so whilst there might be an "average" i.e. more to peace or more to war, you'll need all three attitudes to effectively lead. This is almost impossible without a high level of situational awareness (i.e. understanding the context, knowing what is where) ...
Read 19 tweets
Simon Wardley Profile picture
6 Aug
X : Are you against agile?
Me : Eh, what? I'm a huge fan of XP, been using it since before the Agile Manifesto.
X : But you often say other techniques are more appropriate.
Me : They can be. Depends on context i.e.
... so when you build a large project, you often find yourself using mutliple methods at the same time. That's a good thing.
X : Isn't that complex. Won't one method be better?
Me : No. You can never have one method apply across the lot. The problem is that the meaning of project management covers multiple competencies which have evolved to be good in specific contexts (instances of an evolving thing) ...
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get email notifications when new thread is out from this Author!

Check out other threads from this Author!

Read all threads by @swardley