1) Leading corona researchers admit that they have no scientific evidence for the existence of a virus
Corona_Facts July 03, 2020 archive.org/details/leadin…
Quote, 'The latest information has the explosive power to uncover the greatest deceit against humanity.'
Corona_Facts July 03, 2020 archive.org/details/leadin…
Quote, 'The latest information has the explosive power to uncover the greatest deceit against humanity.'
2) Quote, 'According to this information, every citizen should support the people who fought for this important information. It's finally out, all leading scientists on COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) have admitted that the scientific rules to detect COVID-19 have not been established.'
3) Quote, 'The detection method of the PCR tests is completely meaningless. I have already discussed the subject of PCR testing in two of my articles [translate.google.com/translate?hl=e… and translate.google.com/translate?hl=e…]
4) Quote, 'The question now is: what is required first for the isolation /detection of viruses? We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from.
From textbooks (e.g., White / Fenner. Medical Virology, 1986, p. 9), as well as leading...' ...
From textbooks (e.g., White / Fenner. Medical Virology, 1986, p. 9), as well as leading...' ...
5) ...'virus researchers such as Luc Montagnier or Dominic Dwyer, state that particle purification - that is, the separation of an object from everything that is not that object, such as e.g. Nobel laureate Marie Curie, who in 1898 purified 100 mg of radium chloride by...' ...
6) ..'extracting it from tons of pitchblende – is an essential prerequisite for verifying the existence of a virus and thus proving that the RNA of the particle in question originates from a new virus.
The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, meaning that it...' ..
The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, meaning that it...' ..
7) ...'can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA - but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand.
And because the PCR tests are calibrated on gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences, because SARS-CoV-2 is presumably...'
And because the PCR tests are calibrated on gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences, because SARS-CoV-2 is presumably...'
8) ...'an RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the virus we are looking for. And to know that, it is necessary to properly isolate and purify the suspected virus.
Koch's postulates are the decisive criteria for scientifically detecting a virus." ...
Koch's postulates are the decisive criteria for scientifically detecting a virus." ...
9) 'Before the invention of the electron microscope in the 1930s, it was not possible to see particles this small. Using the electron microscope, the new generation of virologists began examining unclean materials and claiming they could detect the viruses. The problem is...' ...
10) ...'that just by looking at a particle one cannot tell what it is or what it does without fulfilling Koch's postulates.
Koch's postulates were drawn up by the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch in the 19th century.' ...
Koch's postulates were drawn up by the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch in the 19th century.' ...
11) Definition:
Four requirements made by Robert Koch that have to be met in order for a Microorganism may be called the causative agent of a specific disease.
[see image]
Four requirements made by Robert Koch that have to be met in order for a Microorganism may be called the causative agent of a specific disease.
[see image]
12) 'The leading scientists admit that none of them have isolated a virus!
Torsten Engelbrecht ( award-winning journalist) and Konstantin Demeter (independent researcher) asked the scientific teams engaged in the relevant work to which reference is made in connection...' ...
Torsten Engelbrecht ( award-winning journalist) and Konstantin Demeter (independent researcher) asked the scientific teams engaged in the relevant work to which reference is made in connection...' ...
13) ...'with SARS-CoV-2 to prove whether the electron microscopic images depicted in their in vitro experiments purified viruses.
But not a single team could answer "yes" to this question - and no one said purification was not a necessary step. We only received answers... '...
But not a single team could answer "yes" to this question - and no one said purification was not a necessary step. We only received answers... '...
14) ...'such as "No, we did not receive an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification" (see below).
We asked several study authors, " Do your electron micrographs show the purified virus (an isolate)?" , and they gave the following answers:' ...
We asked several study authors, " Do your electron micrographs show the purified virus (an isolate)?" , and they gave the following answers:' ...
15) Study 1: Leo LM Poon; Malik Peiris. “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health” Nature Medicine , March 2020 [ Nature translate.google.com/translate?hl=e… ]
16) Study 2: Myung-Guk Han et al. "Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19", Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives , February 2020 [ Pubmed ncbi translate.google.com/translate?hl=e… ]
17) "Study 3: Wan Beom Park et al. “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea”, Journal of Korean Medical Science , February 24, 2020 [ Pubmed ncbi translate.google.com/translate?hl=e… ]
18) 'Study 4: Na Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China”, 2019, New England Journal of Medicine , February 20, 2020 [ nejm nejm.org/doi/full/10.10… ]'
19) 'Source: off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/cov…
With regard to the work mentioned, it is clear that what is shown in the electron micrographs (EMs) is the end result of the experiment, i.e. there is no other result from which they could have made EMs.
That is, if the authors of these...' ..
With regard to the work mentioned, it is clear that what is shown in the electron micrographs (EMs) is the end result of the experiment, i.e. there is no other result from which they could have made EMs.
That is, if the authors of these...' ..
20) ...'studies admit that their published EMs do not show purified particles, then they definitely do not have purified particles that can be claimed to be viral. (It should be noted in this context that some researchers use the term "isolation" in their work , but the...' ...
21) ...'procedures described therein do not constitute a proper isolation (purification) process. Consequently, the term "isolation" is misused in this context).
For example, the authors of four of the most important papers published in early 2020 claiming the discovery...' ...
For example, the authors of four of the most important papers published in early 2020 claiming the discovery...' ...
22) ...'of a new coronavirus admit that they had no evidence that the origin of the virus genome were virus-like particles, or cell debris, pure or impure, or particles of any kind. In other words, the existence of SARS- CoV-2 RNA is based on belief, not fact.' ...
23) 'In 2001, Science published a "passionate plea ... to the younger generation" by several veteran virologists, including Dr. Charles Calisher,
[quote: modern virus detection methods like] 'the smooth polymerase chain reaction' [...] 'say little or nothing about how...' ...
[quote: modern virus detection methods like] 'the smooth polymerase chain reaction' [...] 'say little or nothing about how...' ...
24) ...'a virus reproduces, which animals are its hosts, [or] how it makes people sick. It's like trying to tell if someone has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint "[source science.sciencemag.org/content/293/55…] ...
25) 'And that's why the two' [Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter] 'asked Dr. Calisher whether he knows of a single paper in which SARS-CoV-2 was isolated and finally really purified. His answer: "I know of no such publication. I have kept an eye out for one. [2]"
26) 'What does that mean?
In short: NOT A SINGLE KOCH'S POSTULATE WAS OBSERVED!'
'one cannot conclude that the RNA gene sequences that the scientists took from the tissue samples prepared in the aforementioned in vitro tests and for those that the PCR tests...' ...
In short: NOT A SINGLE KOCH'S POSTULATE WAS OBSERVED!'
'one cannot conclude that the RNA gene sequences that the scientists took from the tissue samples prepared in the aforementioned in vitro tests and for those that the PCR tests...' ...
27) ...'are ultimately "calibrated" for, belong to a certain virus - in this case SARS-CoV-2.
In addition, there is no scientific evidence that these RNA sequences are the causative agent of what is known as COVID- 19.
In order to establish a causal connection...' ...
In addition, there is no scientific evidence that these RNA sequences are the causative agent of what is known as COVID- 19.
In order to establish a causal connection...' ...
28) ...'in one way or another, that is, beyond virus isolation and purification, it would have been absolutely necessary to conduct an experiment which fulfills Koch's four postulates." ...
29) But there is no such experiment, as Amory Devereux and Rosemary Frei recently demonstrated for OffGuardian. [link off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/sci…] @RosemaryFreiTO
30) 'The need to fulfill these postulates with regard to SARS-CoV-2 is evident not least from the fact that attempts have been made to fulfill them. But even researchers who claimed to have done so were in fact unsuccessful.'
31) The publication in Nature "The pathogenicity of SARS- CoV-2 in hACE2 transgenic mice" also does not meet any of Koch's postulates [link nature.com/articles/s4158…]
32) 'None of the leading German proponents of the official theory on SARS-Cov-2 / COVID-19 [see image] was able to answer the question of how they can be sure, without having a purified virus, that the RNA gene sequences of these particles belong to a certain new virus?'
33) 'Torsten Engelbrecht (award-winning
journalist) and Konstantin Demeter (independent researcher) asked [them] the following question:
[see image]
[ embedded links in image, 1st ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… and 2nd nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/0… ]
journalist) and Konstantin Demeter (independent researcher) asked [them] the following question:
[see image]
[ embedded links in image, 1st ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… and 2nd nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/0… ]
34) 'It should not go unmentioned that we finally have the Charité - the employer of Christian Drosten, Germany's most influential virologist with regard to COVID-19, advisor to the German government and co-developer of the PCR test, which was the first to be "accepted" ...' ...
35) ...'by the WHO worldwide (not validated! {telegra.ph/Der-PCR-Test-i…]) - for answering questions on this topic.
But we didn't get replies until June 18, 2020 , after months of non-response. In the end we only made it with the help of the Berlin lawyer Viviane Fischer.' ...
But we didn't get replies until June 18, 2020 , after months of non-response. In the end we only made it with the help of the Berlin lawyer Viviane Fischer.' ...
36) 'Regarding our question: "Has the Charité made sure that the appropriate particle purification has been carried out?" the Charité admits that it did not use any purified particles. And although they claim that "The Charité virologists are certain that they are testing...' ...
37) ...'for the virus" they state in their work (Corman et al. [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…]):
"RNA was extracted from clinical samples with the MagNA Pure 96 system (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) and from cell culture supernatants with the viral RNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany)."
"RNA was extracted from clinical samples with the MagNA Pure 96 system (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) and from cell culture supernatants with the viral RNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany)."
38) 'That is, they simply assumed that the RNA was viral.
Incidentally, the paper published on January 23, 2020
by Corman et al. did not even follow a proper peer review process, and the procedures outlined in it were not accompanied by controls - although these two...' ...
Incidentally, the paper published on January 23, 2020
by Corman et al. did not even follow a proper peer review process, and the procedures outlined in it were not accompanied by controls - although these two...' ...
39)..'things make scientific work really robust.
But it is much worse, the Charité test was made before the first publication by the Chinese. So there was no clinical data available to even develop a test. Drosten even admits it!'
[telegra.ph/Der-Wissenscha…
wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/articl…]
But it is much worse, the Charité test was made before the first publication by the Chinese. So there was no clinical data available to even develop a test. Drosten even admits it!'
[telegra.ph/Der-Wissenscha…
wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/articl…]
40) 'Also read breaking news in the newsletter [wissenschafftplus.de/cms/de/newslet…] of Dr. Stefan Lanka from June 13th, there you will learn, among other things, that Dr. Stefan Lanka has accused Prof. Drosten of crimes against humanity!'
41) Tweets 1-40 include quotes from archive.org/details/leadin…
which is a English translation of a German article.
An English auto-translation of Stefan Lanka's newsletter wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/articl… can be found here drive.google.com/file/d/195CvDB…
which is a English translation of a German article.
An English auto-translation of Stefan Lanka's newsletter wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/articl… can be found here drive.google.com/file/d/195CvDB…
42) That wasn't nearly covering the whole article, quotes were from pages 1-9 of the 23 page PDF. archive.org/details/leadin…
43)
44)
An MD in the US who still thinks for himself and researches. RADICAL.
https://twitter.com/lysandergrant/status/1303693628657872896?s=20
The link mentioned in the screenshot t.me/Corona_Fakten_…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
