CDC voting guidance includes 3 elements:

1. Alternatives to in-person voting, including voting by mail.

2. Increasing the number of polling locations + extending hours for early voting.

3. Maintaining or increasing the total number of polling places available on Election Day.
Unfortunately, not every jurisdiction is following the CDC’s guidance. We saw what happened in this year’s primary elections in states that reduced the number of polling places and did not have adequate alternatives to in-person voting.
In Georgia, voters waited up to five hours to cast their ballots.

In Texas, voters endured lines up to seven hours long.

In Florida, 112 polling places across the state were closed, moved, or consolidated.
These actions left many voters, especially people of color, unable to exercise their right to vote. We cannot allow the pandemic to be used to continue or exacerbate the ugly history of voter suppression.
The #HeroesAct, which the House passed nearly four months ago, includes $3.6 billion to help state and local governments pay for equipment and staff to safely administer the election. Republicans should agree to allocate these funds without further delay.
The Delivering for America Act, which the House passed last month, requires that election mail be treated as first-class, restores mail service to previous levels, and provides $25 billion as unanimously requested by the bipartisan Postal Service Board of Governors.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James E. Clyburn

James E. Clyburn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WhipClyburn

4 Apr
The President’s decision to name one of his own staff lawyers to serve as the independent Inspector General overseeing the disbursement of hundreds of billions of federal dollars in coronavirus crisis emergency aid smacks of the proverbial ‘fox guarding the henhouse.’
This appointment is especially troubling given the President’s signing statement indicating that he plans to resist the oversight procedures in the CARES Act, which were overwhelmingly agreed to on a bipartisan basis to prevent corporate misconduct and abuse.
The objective of this Inspector General is to ensure this recovery is transparent, fair, and equitable. The appointment of a current White House lawyer to this role calls that objective into question.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!