1/ Is there a way to gauge future expected returns for the US stock market?

What could the returns look like a couple of years from now, and more importantly, 5-year or even 10-year from today?

How could we gauge the risk to reward conditions in the US stocks today?

Thread. 👇
2/ In this thread, we are going to leave bullish & bearish narratives aside, and just focus on valuations — which have historically been the most reliable indicator of future returns.

Please keep in mind that no indicators are perfect & history doesn't necessarily repeat.
3/ We are going to start off with short term predictability, which is extremely difficult to trust.

Let's face it, markets can be swayed by sentiment & macroeconomic shifts over the short term, however, they eventually mean-revert over the very long term.
4/ One of the better indicators for gauging 12-month subsequent is the Citi's Panic/Euphoria sentiment & valuation gauge.

The chart below shows recent readings touched 1.2, which is the most euphoric since the late 1999 Tech Bubble.
5/ Studying the gauge all the way back to its inception in 87, we notice that periods of panic produced positive future 12-month returns,

while periods of euphoria in 2007, 14, 18 & especially in 99/2000 period produced subsequent negative returns.

(outdated chart below)
6/ Placing such evidence together with other signals showing high levels of speculation & parabolic blow-off tops in many of the FANG stocks,

In my humble opinion, the probability is above average to see the next 12 months produce negative returns.
7/ Where things start to look interesting is once we begin anticipating probabilities for 5-year and 10-year future returns.

Current classic stock market valuations, measured either on forward or trailing basis, are overstretched without a doubt.

Forward P/E is now at 23 times.
8/ As I was mentioning earlier, stock prices are a lot more random in the short term, therefore current P/E level has not been a major risk to investors so far.

However, at almost 23X multiple, probabilities are high that by 2025/26 we might see flat to negative returns (chart).
9/ Once you look even further out, more than a 5-year time frame, the forward P/E multiple has even better forecasting success.

Historically, overpriced markets have delivered poor & disappointing long term returns.
10/ Price to book valuation has "benched" by Wall Street because companies book has more & more intangible assets.

Nevertheless, I wanted to share this VERY long term chart with you showing the ratio at the 3 most overvalued times in history:

1929 @ 3.6X
2000 @ 4.9X
2020 @ 4.0X
11/ Bloomberg shared an interesting chart showing US growth vs the US value price to book ratio difference... and it has striking similarities to the Tech bubble of the late 1990s.

Nevertheless, investors always think it is different this time.
12/ I've combined P/B indicator together with price to forward sales ratio, averaged the two out, and you got a pretty accurate 10-year future expected return.

And for the US large caps, it is currently flashing negative for the first time since the year 2000.
13/ However, the indicator that really stands out is Buffett's valuation gauge (de-trended market cap vs GDP). Three dates stand out here:

• 1968 @ 59%, followed by lost decade of the 70s

• 2000 @ 71%, followed by lost decade of the 2000s

• 2020 @ 69%, what comes next?
14/ Citi's sentiment gauge, which has a solid track record, is forecasting negative returns in 2021/22.

The forward P/E is forecasting flat to negative returns in 2025-28.

However, valuations gauge predictability success raises the further out we look, especially 10 years plus.
15/ The US stock market has gone through lost decades before & it could happen again.

Has it already started or is it just around the corner? I don't know.

However, passive investors' assumptions that buy & hold is the holy grail of easy retirement might be challenged.
16/ Other wealthy countries around the world, from Japan to Britain, and from Hong Kong to France are currently going through these "dead money" periods.

Let us remember, the Japanese stock market peaked close to 40,000 points in 1990 and has been dead for three decades.
17/ Furthermore, the EU & UK stock markets peaked between 1998-2000 period (depending on which index we look at) & have been dead money for over two decades.

The charts below are the British FTSE 100 & the French CAC 40 indices.
18/ Finally, let us glance at the Emerging Markets ETF as well as the Hang Seng Index.

Both of these markets give one a very broad Asian exposure — the fastest-growing region for some time now.

And yet, both of them are dead money for 13 years, since 2007.
19/ Of course, US investors think this could never happen to their own equity market — which has been outperforming the rest of the world.

After all, the US is an epicenter of innovation, with its market overweighting tech giants like Amazon, Apple, Microsoft & several others.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tiho Brkan

Tiho Brkan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TihoBrkan

30 Aug
1/ Thread on the US technology sector. $QQQ $XLK

Every man & his dog know tech is outperforming other sectors, the market cap of several tech companies has exceeded the GDP of many countries & the retail investors are jumping on the easy money bandwagon.

So, is tech a bubble?
2/ The short answer: I don't know.

The long answer?

Let us have a look at charts, data points & trends to decide whether the Tech sector — at this moment in time — is a good long term investment opportunity based on the "weight of evidence approach."
3/ Before I start, it is worth noting that we aren't expert growth investor, nor married to this narrative alone.

So while we lack expertise & god-given status, we allocate capital to many different sectors (for diversification) based on a bit of common sense & objectivity.
Read 23 tweets
27 Aug
In personal finance, we discuss disciplined spending, forced saving, frugality, the FIRE movement, investing strategies, asset classes, emergency funds & so forth.

But you don't see many financial advisors discussing the "utility of money" at different ages.

(Continued)
If you keep on dollar-cost averaging into your 401k, by 65 or 70 — yes — you probably will have enough to retire on, but the utility of that money is going to be very low.

You might have the time & the money, but you won't have the energy or excitement like your younger self.
On the other hand, at 32-38 the utility of money is possibly at its peak.

You are in your prime, still extremely healthy & strong, enough stamina, and even some wisdom.

At this point in your life, being frugal & denying yourself wonderful experiences is just silly.
Read 7 tweets
26 Aug
Real estate has incredible flexibility & optionality.

Maximize returns?

Invest with equity, add high leverage, focus on add value or development.

Protect downside?

Expose to the (senior or mezz) debt during times when valuations are too high, locking in a fixed return.
Diversify?

Invest in different sectors such as residential, commercial, industrial or mixed-use.

Exposure yourself to different parts of the capital stack, either earning interest or airing capital gains.

Focus on different cities, countries regions, currency denominations.
Build a team and a business?

Develop a team of worthy assistants, partners, and consultants from agents/brokers to risk underwriters, contractors, bankers & lawyers.

All of them are there to help you see your investment succeed and/or your project vision through.
Read 5 tweets
13 Aug
I tweet a lot about finances. Here is a tweet that won’t make you rich, but might be of very high benefit:

• walk 10,000 steps a day

• exercise everyday

• read something outside of your interest or career field

• live by sea/ocean at some stage in your life

Continued...
• don’t live to work (Western capitalism) but instead work to live (European la dolce vita)

• travel

• worth saying it again: travel and see the world, try new foods, meeting new people or experience different cultures, religions & traditions (you’ll grow)
• learn to be a contrarian, at least sometimes (don’t follow or be part of group think)

• spend money and time on experiences & relationships, because 10 years from now you’ll still remember & talk about them (not your fancy watch)
Read 12 tweets
2 Aug
Is it possible to make a 3.6X ROI over 24 months in real estate?

Yes.

But obviously, you will need a highly specialized set of development skills like the guys in this thread.👇

Breaking down real estate developments & the capital stack.
North London council granted this particular developer planning permission to construct a 6-storey building.

It will include 2 commercial units on the ground level and 22 residential apartments divided into four 1 beds, eight 2 beds & ten 3 beds.
The development also had a 2-storey underground carpark (29 spaces in total), plus there is a communal rooftop garden for all residents, too.

It's a ground-up development and the CGI illustration can be seen in the picture attached.
Read 16 tweets
23 Jun
The actions, mindset & strategies needed to succeed in achieving the 1% level are not going to be very useful to achieving wealth towards 0.1% or higher.

Some examples down below. 👇🏼
• The 1% are attempting to achieve retirement by 65, but the 0.1% are planning how to do it before 30 (many do it by 25).

• The 1% save their way to prosperity very very slowly, while the 0.1% use the abundance mindset so instead of saving they are GROWING their income rapidly
• The 1% stay away from debt as their financial advisors call it a “sin”, while the 0.1% leverage OPM (other peoples money) to make their fortune faster & as long as the debt is serviced with income producing assets, the 0.1% want to take on more — not less — debt!
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!