On Jul 1, Mexico's Congress passed a new copyright law that pasted in the worst aspects of US and EU copyrights. The law passed without debate or consultation, as part of Donald Trump's #USMCA trade deal.
Then, a month later, Mexico's Human Rights Commission stopped the law (temporarily), referring it to the Mexican Supreme Court on the grounds that it could violate the Mexican Constitution.
They're right to worry. The US's digital copyright system - the #DMCA - is 22 years old and over that time, it has been a disaster for human rights. We should know. We've been fighting it since it was just a bill, working its way through Congress.
In consultation with our partner NGOs, and to help Mexican lawmakers, people and firms understand what's at stake, we've published a review of 22 years' worth of US DMCA human rights crises - the law that Mexico based their own new copyright on.
Start with #FreeExpression: the DMCA threatens device owners who bypass digital locks, even when they need to do so for legal uses: recording a program, remixing it for commentary or criticism, or capturing it for investigation or analysis.
Bans on breaking DRM interfere with free expression. Think of app stores: creators can't provide their copyrighted works to the audience unless the app store owners allow it. If they don't, you have to break DRM—and risk a lawsuit—to load it.
6/14
Then there's self-determination. DRM is used to enforce all kinds of arbitrary limits on protected private activity - think of #CPCM, the digital locks on DVB television signals. This DRM defines what a family (!) is, and is not.
The wealthy execs from the global north who created CPCM made sure it would work at your summer home and on your boat - but if you're a migrant whose family drifts apart and reforms, your family doesn't count.
8/14
Next: #Disability. Many tech companies have done excellent work in making their products accessible, but accessibility is a highly individual matter - every person needs different accommodations and no one can hope to anticipate all needs.
And while many laws protect the rights of people with disabilities, they are no match for the DMCA's ban on breaking DRM. Abbot Labs used DRM to block a project that helped people with diabetes connect their glucose meters to their insulin pumps.
US copyright law under the DMCA is so draconian that it blocks you from sharing a tool that prevents seizure-triggering strobe effects in streaming videos.
US copyright law also interferes with archives as well as other vital cultural institutions, such as galleries, museums and libraries - because storing, displaying and replaying works often requires bypassing DRM.
Our paper also explains ways in which US copyright law has interfered with national security, information security, repair, resilience, health care and education - a suite of national priorities that intersect with human rights.
13/14
We are greatly heartened that the Mexican Supreme Court has taken up this urgent issue, and we stand with our partners at @R3Dmx and @DerechosDigitales in urging the court to suspend the law while they consider it.
Each time you see a targeted ad, your personal data has just been exposed to thousands of advertisers and data brokers through a process called “real-time bidding” (RTB).
This process does more than deliver ads — it lets data brokers harvest and monetize your online activity, which fuels government surveillance, and even poses national security risks. 🧵(1/8)
What’s real-time bidding (RTB)? It’s the process used to select the targeted ads shown to you on nearly every site and app you visit.
Those ads are the winners of milliseconds-long auctions that expose your personal info to thousands of companies a day.
The auction starts by sending thousands of potential advertisers your personal data, including your unique advertising ID, location, IP address, and demographic information. Advertisers use that information to decide whether or not to bid.
While only one advertiser wins the auction, all advertisers can keep your personal data. (2/8)
Essentially, anyone posing as an ad buyer can access a stream of sensitive data about the billions of individuals using sites or apps with targeted ads.
This is a big way that data brokers get a hold of personal data that they then sell to basically anyone willing to pay. (3/8)
In the wake of the 2024 election in the U.S., many people are concerned about their digital privacy. EFF has decades of experience in providing digital privacy and security resources, particularly for vulnerable people. We’ve written a lot of resources over the years and here are the top ten that we think are most useful right now 🧵(1/13)
Our Surveillance Self-Defense guides are a great place to start your journey of securing yourself against digital threats. We know that it can be a bit overwhelming, so we recommend starting with our guide on making a security plan so you can familiarize yourself with the basics and decide on your specific needs. (2/13)ssd.eff.org
If you are creating your security plan for the first time, it’s helpful to know which technologies might realistically be used to spy on you. Our Street-Level Surveillance team has spent years studying the technologies that law enforcement uses and has made this handy website where you can find information about technologies including drones, face recognition, license plate readers, stingrays, and more. sls.eff.org (3/13)
"If the government is really concerned ... it should look at data privacy more broadly & enact more comprehensive data-privacy regulation that would restrict how all companies, not just TikTok, collect & retain & use user data.” - @DavidGreene in @GridNewsgrid.news/story/technolo…
Each TikTok user “does their own threat modeling; they can determine to what extent, if they have enough knowledge about how their data is used, whether the threat that using the app poses is something that’s acceptable for them."-@DavidGreene in @GridNewsgrid.news/story/technolo…
It's Sunshine Week, and that means The Foilies, EFF and @MuckRock's annual faux awards for agencies that behave badly when confronted with public records requests. The winners are… eff.org/deeplinks/2023…
The Federal Bureau of Investigation for dragging its feet in providing records on how it was keeping tabs on The Monkees. eff.org/deeplinks/2023…
The National Security Agency for being transparent about the thousands of times it could neither confirm nor deny it had information requested by a member of the public. eff.org/deeplinks/2023…
Victory! The security expert @olabini was finally declared innocent yesterday in a unanimous verdict by a three-judge tribunal in Ecuador. 1/ peoplesdispatch.org/2023/02/01/dig…
@olabini Since his 70-day arbitrary detention in 2019, Ola Bini’s case has been impacted by numerous due process violations and human rights concerns. It went through suspensions or delays at nearly every stage of his trial. 2/ eff.org/deeplinks/2023…
@olabini He faced unfounded accusations based on misunderstandings of technology, which disregarded the vital role of security experts and secure technology to safeguard everyone’s rights and security. 3/ eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
El Martes 31 de enero se reinstala la audiencia de juicio de @olabini. Estamos pendientes y esperando que la corte de un ejemplo de transparencia y ajustado a los criterios técnicos y legales.
@eff Nos preocupa que un único día de audiencia no baste para terminar un juicio ya lleno de retrasos e irregularidades eff.org/es/deeplinks/2…
@eff Este proceso y la necesidad de decisiones ajustadas a criterios técnicos y legales son vitales para los derechos digitales en Ecuador.