Today we’re sharing the findings from Glimmers - a real-time investigation into technology and civil society. We’ve looked at how communities and charities digitally transformed at speed since March — and what that means for the near future @plotlondon glimmersreport.net A lighthouse icon, and text that says, “A vision for commu
@plotlondon 1. Putting a Zoom on it isn’t enough!

Communities and charities have adapted to digital delivery almost overnight - they’ve been adaptable and inventive, despite being overstretched.

But social capital, serendipity and inclusive design are needed too. glimmersreport.net/report/findings
@plotlondon 2. Crisis management isn’t the same as time travel.

Things might look futuristic, but we haven’t really ffwd'd to 2030 - communities have been repurposing the tech, tools and skills they have right now to do amazing things. That’s not sustainable.

glimmersreport.net/report/insight
@plotlondon 3. Respond, Recover, Renew

It’s tempting to focus on #buildingbackbetter now, but many communities and charities are still in Response mode. Recovery and reflection is vital before committing to whatever comes next. glimmersreport.net/report/mapping
@plotlondon 4. Making Room for Recovery

We’ve created the Glimmers Toolkit, a set of light-weight, thoughtful exercises for teams and organisations who feel ready to explore what recovery looks like and start setting future strategies. glimmersreport.net/toolkit
@plotlondon 5. Community-powered tech

Looking ahead: so much change and power can come from this rapid transformation. A digitally engaged civil society could come together and use its collective wisdom to influence and inform how technology is made.

glimmersreport.net/report/communi…
@plotlondon 6. Building a community tech stack

Lastly: communities deserve more than the crumbs from Big Tech. So we’re calling for a community tech stack that is:

*Anti-surveillance
*Safe by design
*Open source
*Priortises problem-solving over profit-making

glimmersreport.net/report/communi…
@plotlondon More detail on the Glimmers website glimmersreport.net. Thanks to everyone who participated in the research, to @TNLComFund for funding the work, and to @CassieRobinson for brilliant input throughout. Please do read, share and let us know what you think

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rachel Coldicutt

Rachel Coldicutt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rachelcoldicutt

3 Sep
I absolutely get the need for ambitious, galvanising language but describing rolling out a mass testing programme as “Operation Moonshot” makes me really, very uncomfortable politico.eu/newsletter/lon… #responsibleinnovation
Also, from the - admittedly scant - detail in the Politico newsletter, it sounds like this “Operation Moonshot” is already deviating from the best practice set out in the PM’s Council for Science and Tech letter outlining principles for moonshots assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Moonshots are inherently risky and heroic. Betting recovery on a moonshot is too fragile and too flimsy - surely the hope of a widely available vaccine in a year or 2 is a moonshot in and of itself? Be good to get some practical mitigations in place too, to manage the near term.
Read 6 tweets
26 Aug
I haven’t read all the risks or looked at the financials, but from a skim of the Palantir IPO filing, I bet we’ll see a lot more of their platforms popping up across UK government. If you’re a UK civil servant working with data, you should read this sec.report/Document/00011…
The headlines. Palantir’s customers want to see deep connections across unrelated data sets to drive decision-making and are annoyed that is not commonly possible.
This seems to me a whisker away from conspiracy thinking and almost certainly speaks to a desire to post-rationalise decisions with otherwise ungatherable data. But anyway ...
Read 10 tweets
14 Aug
So, my very unsexy opinion about both the A Levels algorithm and the months’ long digital contact tracing farrago is that deploying technology without proper supporting structures and governance is by no means faster and leaner. It is slower, messier and much more dangerous.
Sure, it might be faster to get out the door, but oh boy, that long tail of tidying up after the initial heroic leap is … well, long.
.@Samfr makes the point here, for instance, that there was preparatory work that could have been done around appeals for students
Read 5 tweets
11 Aug
In what is terrible news for everyone, I find myself admiring the questions in the BEIS R&D Roadmap Survey (closing date tomorrow) beisgovuk.citizenspace.com/innovation/r-a… I’m going to exercise some self-restraint in tweeting, but the Alan Partridge of Incomprehensibility has been at it again
Apparently the UK is going to “push harder at the frontiers of knowledge” - wch sounds a bit like “making it up as we go along”. Also, my oh my, *this question*: "How can we best increase knowledge and understanding through research, including by achieving bigger breakthroughs?"
The question writer obvs not a fan of cryptic clues. Q2 is similarly leading: "2. How can we maximise the economic, environmental and societal impact of research through effective application of new knowledge?” (Interesting approach to consultation.)
Read 11 tweets
3 Aug
Good morning! How are you? I have childcare *all day* today, so watch out world.
In the meantime, in case you were thinking I was bringing some not-very scienceyness to my concerns about data-driven decisions in British govt, I bring you 3 (three!) *actual men* who are *academics* with diff variants of the same.
Firstly, learning from our friends in N America who sadly got to this sorry state a few years before us, here is @CT_Bergstrom
Read 9 tweets
27 Jul
“The fact that the Met ... now see a need to rely on ... data analytics in order to reach an ‘understanding of the communities’ within their areas is a sign of just how far we have moved away from ... community policing”. So many dimensions of “no” here. theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/j…
That a police force can buy software capable of racial profiling but say it’s okay because they didn’t actually *do* any racial profiling seems like sophistry at best. What kind of procurement guidelines does that pass?
I am becoming such a boring person but - where is the oversight? Where are the guidelines? Where is the person with authority saying “remember how badly the London Gangs Matrix went, let’s never do that again”? Where is the *regulation* of public use of data?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!