All through the 80s, the US gov denied asylum applications from Salvadorans & Guatemalans at exorbitantly high rates for political reasons: the US was supporting the regimes that were brutalizing their own people & forcing them to flee. 1/
The political logic was simple & brutal: if the US granted asylum claims, then it would have to acknowledge that the Salvadoran and Guatemalan governments it was propping up (with aid $$, military advisors, etc) were murderous and incorrigible abusers of human rights. 2/
Eventually, after major legal challenge, US gov't conceded that it had politicized the asylum process & violated national (& int'l law). The settlement that followed (ABC v. Thornburgh) gave hundreds of thousands of Central Americans another chance at asylum/legal status in US 3/
Now, after four years in which the Trump Administration has systematically dismantled the asylum system, a new DHS whistle-blower complaint supplies evidence that at the highest levels of DHS officials worked to squelch & suppress information relevant to asylum determinations. 4/
In the 80s, officials at State Dept issued boilerplate reports on "country conditions" for Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to use to deny asylum claims. Now: DHS officials are demanding that these reports be rewritten to support Trump's attacks on asylum seekers. 5/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Blitzer

Jonathan Blitzer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JonathanBlitzer

10 Sep
The DHS whistle-blower complaint provides even more evidence of how the dept has simply become a cesspool of Trumpism. There's one set of details concerning Central America that seems worth calling attention to, since it may get overshadowed by all the other scandalous stuff. 1/
"In Dec 2019, Murphy attended a meeting w Cuccinelli & Glawe to discuss intelligence reports regarding conditions in Guatemala, Honduras, & El Salvador. The intelligence reports were designed to help asylum officers render better determinations regarding their legal standards.2/
Murphy presented the reports to Cuccinelli in the meeting. "Murphy defended the work in the reports, but Cuccinelli stated he wanted changes to the information outlining high levels of corruption, violence, & poor economic conditions in the three respective countries." 3/
Read 6 tweets
5 Sep
A question in the form of a thread: I genuinely wonder how Chad Wolf is trying to position himself at this point. He’s become Trump’s first DHS head (acting) to fully embrace (& amplify) every politicized whim & crackpot demand from WH. And to try to identify himself w Trump. 1/
All of his predecessors (Kelly, Duke, Nielsen, McAleenan) did truly shocking things in support of the President’s agenda. But each of them tried to style him/herself as an independent actor, struggling to balance a department against an erratic President. 2/
That struggle was a cynical act, to be sure. But it reflected some recognition and awareness of a life beyond Trump; that they’d have to answer for themselves in some fashion, however superficially, down the line, whether in the private sector or in future public service. 3/
Read 7 tweets
21 Jul
A recurring theme in the convos I’ve been having w former DHS officials is a sense of alarm—not just abt all the lines being crossed in Portland, but also abt how the Admin is sabotaging the dept’s standing by reducing agents to “foot soldiers” for an overly political WH campaign
One particular sore spot: While DHS leadership is mugging for the cameras, talking tough on social media, and picking fights with city and state officials, there are about to be massive staff furloughs at the Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS) because of budget shortfalls.
It’s no wonder why: USCIS is in charge of administering the country’s legal immigration system. Former DHS official told me: “The Administration is effectively shutting down our country’s congressional mandated legal immigration system by furloughing nearly 3/4 of USCIS...
Read 4 tweets
19 Jun
I hope lawmakers are taking note of the statements being made right now by Chad Wolf, Ken Cuccinelli, & Joseph Edlow abt today's SCOTUS decision on #DACA. All of them serve in "acting" roles at the top of DHS. (cc @SpeakerPelosi @SenSchumer @RepJayapal @RepEscobar @AOC et al) 1/
All of them are in charge of complying with today's decision, and Edlow, who's effectively running USCIS, is directly in charge of handling #DACA applications. And yet all of them have publicly & dramatically attacked the Court's ruling, suggesting that it may be illegitimate. 2/
Even as pure rhetoric this is dangerous. But there's reason to be concerned that this isn't idle, Trumpist chatte. There are all sorts of ways DHS leadership can undercut DACA in the final months of Trump's term. Some are administrative (slow-walking applications, etc). 3/
Read 11 tweets
11 Jun
One other thing to keep in mind as asylum seekers, immigration lawyers & advocates reel from yesterday's news abt the Trump Admin's new rules to turn asylum law (as enshrined in US statute & international compacts) on its head: Chad Mizelle, acting general counsel for DHS. 1/
He's often described as being "close" to Stephen Miller. It's more than that, really. He was handpicked by Miller as the Department's *top* lawyer precisely because Mizelle, who is all of 7 years out of law school, will do the White House's bidding. 2/
As bad as things were at DHS & the WH before Mizelle took over, in February 2020, the general counsel's office still needed to square the Admin's fantastical notions with some semblance of legality. Often, it failed because the task was impossible. But there was tension. 3/
Read 6 tweets
10 Jun
I just spoke to the brilliant @LCortesRomero abt some of the implications of the Administration’s latest immigration announcement: the proposed rule change to gut the few, basic remaining procedural avenues available to people seeking asylum in the US. s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspect… 1/
In addition to laying out how, exactly, this rule change would completely end the ability of an asylum seeker to seek even the most limited protection in the US, Luis also pointed out that there’s a potential consequence for DACA recipients down the line. 2/
Unclear what will happen at SCOTUS, but if DACA is canceled & a DACA recipient is put into removal proceedings, this rule wld make it so that, Luis says, “the judge can deny asylum applications summarily, cutting the only lifeline that most Dreamers have in immigration court.” 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!