BC Government Old Growth Panel in new report: Despite commitments on old growth management: No review in 20 years, No monitoring, No system to track compliance, No evaluation, previous recommendations not implemented. #bcpoli
"We also encourage you to consider our recommendations as a whole. Had previous old forest strategies and recommendations been fully implemented, we would likely not be facing the challenges around old growth to the extent we are today." pg 3 Amen to that. engage.gov.bc.ca/app/uploads/si…
Impressive extensive process in a short time. 800 direct conversations and thousands of surveys and written submissions.
current challenges: high risk loss of biodiversity in many ecosystems, uncertainty and conflict, widespread lack of confidence in system of managing forests "continuing to apply the policy approaches that brought us to this point will not provide a sustainable solution." pg 6
"the conditions that exist in many of these forests and ecosystems are also simply non-renewable in any reasonable time frame." pg 14
"despite the good intentions and efforts of many people...the overall system of forest management has not supported the effective implementation or achievement of the stated and legislated public objectives for old forests." pg 14
Recommendations extensive, summarized pg 15. All very good, echo what we have been hearing from indigenous leaders &scientists. some highlights: Declare conservation of ecosystem health and biodiversity of BC's forests as an overarching priority & enact legislation
Number 6 is exactly what the scientists recommended and what the @standearth & others have been asking for! "Until a new strategy is implemented, defer development in old forests where ecosystems are at very high and near-term risk of irreversible biodiversity loss" #bcpoli
Okay let's turn to the response government has rushed out at the same time as the report: Great they are saying engage full involvement of indigenous leaders and organizations. Like the framing re ending divisive practices and patchwork approach.
hmmm..Minister Donaldson takes a run at scientists & environmental organizations using industry PR lines re "those calling for immediate moratoriums..ignoring needs of tens of thousands of workers." this is untrue. It is factually incorrect.
We are not ignoring the needs, in fact we have been calling for more jobs with a value added strategy & better management means better forest health & longer term jobs. Most importantly we were only calling for deferral on the critical productive old growth less than 400,000 h.
Government is announcing some deferrals which is fantastic! Strangely list seems to include areas that were already announced, doesn't track w/ panel recs for deferral? Why ask a panel experts to work this hard & then ignore what they say must be acted on as quickly as possible?
For reference here is what the Old Growth Panel recommends for immediate deferral. Exactly what other scientists recommended & tracks with the 400,000 hectares @standearth & thousands others have been asking to be deferred? Doesn't look like that is what BC did today...#bcpoli
Okay were are we at? Really important Old Growth Panel report. Some first steps (as they said in release) taken by @DonaldsonDoug to defer some old growth logging but strangely falls short of their own panel of experts recs for immediate action in old growth areas at risk #bcpoli
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let’s get something straight about fossil fuel phase-out: renewables needn’t replace all the coal, oil and gas we use today bc most of it is just used to produce and move those fossil fuels around!
We only need to replace the useful energy: 37% of what we currently produce 🫨🧵
Just want to emphasize this. Fossil fuels are only 37% efficient.
In other words, 63% of the oil, gas, and coal we extract goes to waste in the production, refinement, and transportation process
Moving fossil fuels around is responsible for 45% of shipping traffic globally. That’s $42 billion per year on moving fossil fuels (mostly LNG) around 🤯 🫠 🫣
🧵 What we have been seeing in the #cop28 negotiations can be summarized as the good, the bad, and the ugly. 1/6
The good: many countries have had strong statements in support of a phase out of fossil fuels in line with science and the 1.5ºC target, and a full phase out of fossil fuel subsidies. 2/6
The bad: terms like 'phase down', 'unabated' and 'inefficient'. These are not just terms, it's a tactic being used by the fossil fuel industry to ensure that they can continue to grow production despite clear science on the need for *absolute* emissions & production decline. 3/6
🚨💀Lethal heat, heat extremes beyond human experience just some of the terrifying terms and definitions in new research just out by scientists at Penn State & Perdue.🧑🔬
Climate change will expose billions to heat & humidity so extreme their bodies simply cannot cope.
🧵 1/19
They took new “survivability limit” measurements for heat and humidity, and combined those with climate models.
The results are profoundly disturbing. Humanity is *much* more vulnerable than we previously thought.
2/19
There’s a limit to what the human body can handle.
“Uncompensable heat stress” happens when it’s no longer possible to cool down. Core body temperature rises continuously.
This is already happening in some places but will increase dramatically as we breach 2°C or 3°C.
No a carbon tax won’t stop wildfires but it helps. Let me spell out the connection for you. Close to 90% of the emissions trapped in our atmosphere causing climate change are from oil, gas and coal. 🧵#cdnpoli
These pollutants trapped in our atmosphere creating a blanket that smothers the earth. This in turn heats up the earth causing extreme weather, flooding, droughts and yes more extreme and frequent wildfires. 2/
Numerous scientific reports have warned of a surge in severity and frequency of wildfires due to climate change 3/ nytimes.com/2022/02/23/cli…
Exxon Mobile claims carbon capture tech can wipe its excessive emissions clean. But that's a dirty ploy to keep expanding fossil fuels in a world on fire (and get even more subsidisies to do it.) 🧵
See for yourself. Even the oil giant's own sustainability report indicates how inflated and fantastical these claims are. Carbon capture (in red) nowhere near compensates for rising ad reckless fossil fuel emissions.
CCS is a delay tactic used to ramp up production. It does nothing to reduce the 80-90% of emissions generated from a barrel of oil downstream at the customer end. It does nothing to capture other pollutants. nationalobserver.com/2022/09/27/opi…
Oil companies are raking in billions in profits that they're using to lobby govs into funding more oil projects that will make higher profits (and kill us all) and we’re still inviting them to climate negotiations to be *checks notes* ...realistic??? 🧵
In my reality, here on Earth, the planet is rapidly warming because of fossil fuel emissions and we’re running out of time to fix it. We need strong action to transition to 100% renewables.
The oil companies themselves won’t get us there. Just look at their track record.
Big Oil has raked in billions in the past year while the rest of us were weighed down by rising costs of food, energy, and housing. They’ve profited off an affordability crisis, proving the only thing that matters to them is their bottom line. theguardian.com/business/2022/…