The subject of "1T1V" on #EOS, clearly answered by Dan Larimer.
Timestamp 2:22:30-2:24:44 (last 5 minutes of video)
Take-aways:
• Dan re-confirms that he does want 1T1V.
• B1 has already implemented the code that makes it an easily adjustable parameter (to change how many votes there will be per token).
• He says definitively 1T1V will go a long way to keeping things DECENTRALIZED. Note that this is opposite of what a few BPs say who sometimes try to talk it down (the ones who likely benefit from 1T30V). He says 1T1V will also reduce b1's influence on the network.
• The roll-out plan: Dan says we're going to see the staking pool idea implemented first, and then will come a gradual reduction in the number of votes per token. B1 will incentivize this by voting for those BPs who are on-board with this change.
My friend came up with this very interesting question for @stablekwon and TFL (TerraFormLabs) regarding #Terra $LUNA sold privately to investors. I said I didn’t know and I’d ask.
👇👇 Start of thread🧵 👇👇
1/12
I apologize for the rant but here we go: Anchor is the heart of LUNA— not some secondary promotional feature or perk. The majority of UST exists to gain Anchor yield. It makes LUNA scarce whereby it wouldn't be otherwise.
2/12
You do have the benefit of marketing the brand and creating new liquidity pools on exchanges but EOS is pretty well known and is on every exchange.
Also, think about where all @anchor_protocol's "magic" yield money came from?
From a technical standpoint, #BCH's CODEBASE is far superior than #BTC's— it’s just that it lost the ticker symbol & thus had to start over with network effect.
👇👇 thread 🧵👇👇
If #BTC had #BCH’s code, it would have stopped the need for many altcoins that blossomed in 2017/2018 due to BTC’s congestion.
BCH would run the Lightning Network far better than BTC ever could because LN runs *better* with non-full blocks.
2/
And there are much better solutions than Segwit. It’s really a bad solution for the problems it tries to “solve”.
Maxis claim destroying 0-conf was a feature. This was a lie to force adoption of layer 2 scaling while stunting layer 1 scaling.
3/