A wee story that came back to mind yesterday, it involves former News of the World Editor and chief advisor to Prime Minister David Cameron Andy Coulson, and, to this day is the funniest thing I ever heard in a court
1
Anyways, Mr Coulson was on trial at the Old Bailey for conspiracy to illegally intercept communications (phone hacking) and spent two days in the withess box being cross-examined
2
To almost every question his response was "I don't remember," or for variety "I don't recall.' He kept telling the court that he was a busy man, he couldn't be expected to remember if he had read this email or that email, he just couldn't recollect.
3
At one point, the prosecution counsel, Andrew Ellis QC even asked, in frustration, if Mr Coulson was suffering from some sort of illness that affected his memory, but the defendant remained firm, he simply couldn't assist the court because he had no memory of the events.
4
After he had given his "evidence" Mr Coulson's lawyers then called a character witness, a doctor of some sort who told the court that "Andy" was a great guy, children loved him, he did lots of work for charity, but didn't like to talk about it, the usual stuff.
5
But the the doctor added, "and he also has an amazing memory,"
You could have heard a pin drop in court, and the defence barrister suddenly went, "no further questions," and sat down.
6
Edis, for the prosecution then stood up and said the to presiding Judge, Mr Justice Saunders, that while it was normal practice not to cross-examine a character witness, in this case he thought it might be of assistance to the court if he clarified a matter, the judge said yes.
7
So Mr Edis asked the witness if he could expand on his comment that Mr Coulson had an "amazing memory"?
8
The doctor replied, "It's amazing, he never forgets anything, you can have a conversation with him 5 years ago and he still remembers it word for word, he has a mind like a steel trap."
9
At that point the whole court fell about laughing, the judge, the jury, us the public gallery, the poor doctor didn't know what was going on, Coulson just sat in the dock with his head in his hands, his whole defence blown away by his own witness."
,10
He was later, unsurprisingly, sentenced to 18 months #fin
(In a fun little proscript, Mr Coulson later stood trial court in Edinburgh for perjury for denying he knew anything about phone hacking at the perjury trial of Tommy Sheridan in 2010.
The very first motion his Advocate made was to ban me from the court as I was not a "responsible journalist "
I still think that was because I reported the "mind like a steel trap," thing in real time.
The judge said no and we got to live tweet the first full Scottish criminal case in history.
And that's why I love court reporting, it's often dull, and sometimes tragic, but occasionally it has those little moments that make it all worthwhile.
Why did the Sun/News of the world hack William and Harry so much?
A thread.
Royal news and gossip was a staple of their output, but their problem was that, in 2006/2010 the younger members of the family, who the public was most interested wouldn't cooperate, as they blamed the press for Diana's death
Their Royal reporters were also mostly middle aged men in suits, they wouldn't exactly blend in at the London nightspots the young set hung out at
Counsel now going over emails sent to the Mail on Sunday to Harry's solicitors asking if they wanted to "comment or guide," them on their planned article.
Counsel, Harry had only made the offer to pay when the judicial review was already in progress.
Says "That's the basis of what the criticism [in the article] was about
Back at court (by video link) for a motions hearing in the case of Prince Harry v Associated Newspapers.
Not sure what I'll be able to report, but will let you all know what I can.