Kelly Lamrock Profile picture
Sep 13, 2020 34 tweets 6 min read Read on X
As we head to the finish line in #nbpoli there are all sorts of guesses and interpretations of the polling we are seeing, and predictions. FWIW, here's what I'm looking at to get a sense of what to watch on election night.
1. First of all -- don't buy the posturing of those who say "polls mean nothing". If you use them right, you'll know more. What we remember as polling misses are usually (a) late trends that continued after polls went dark or (b) people mistaking the CW they remember for polls
2. A big part is to avoid getting caught up in any one poll. Sure, right now Libs love EKOS and PCs are all debunking it. But smart prognosticators look at the commonalities and averages -- any one poll can miss something, but they rarely all miss. NB polling has commonalities.
3. First, remember where we started -- last election tells us what a dead heat in seats looks like. The Libs won the popular vote by 6 points.But lots of those were running up the score in the North, and in seats it was a tiny (but significant) 22-21 PC edge.
4. That also means that when you see a party surge in pop vote, you need a theory of where it came from. A surge in the rural North or rural South may mean little -- just turns 40 point wins to 20 point wins. But in the cities, a 5 point swing can matter. So, what do we know?
5. We have had 6 polls in the elxn period. Two came later, post-debate. Only one pollster (Mainstreet) gave us 2 polls to compare. We have that. We also can bet parties have polls we don't see--but we can sometimes guess their assumptions by their actions and choices.
6. The PCs: in 5/6 polls, they fall into the high 30s/low 40s. The 2 late polls are lowest --37% and 33%. The good news? All of these mean they're UP from 2018, and they narrowly won that. The bad news is there's some sign of slippage. But how much?
7. Some slippage is normal. "Rally-round-the-flag" leads (where a leader handles a crisis competently) tend to be fragile. An election returns a leader to equal status w/others, and voters remember their issue differences. War leaders --Bush, Churchill-- lost post-crisis.
8. The good news for Team Higgs is that the one repeat pollster -- Mainstreet -- was their least bullish early poll. Comparing their best poll (44%) to EKOS (33) looks like freefall. Mainstreet's 38 to 37 looks like a stable vote in a fairly tame election, and the PCs want that.
9. The Libs have stability, too. 4/6 polls have them at 32-33%. Two more show slippage to the high 20s. Even EKOS,shows the PCs falling back to them, but no Lib gains. Good news-their floor is solid, even if Vickers has been seen as weak. Bad news - no growth beyond their base.
10. It is significant that the later the poll, the better the Greens do. Low teens early, late polls are pushing 20%. David Coon has quietly stuck to issues, and it's quietly helping him. There's consensus among pollsters on that.
11. PANB polls are hardest to read. Some had them near collapse at 2%, below the "Thomason Line". EKOS has them rebounding to 10% with some gains in Fton and rural south. The PC/PANB split is the most volatile among the pollsters.
12. Other factors -- I think incumbency and local riding assns will matter. In a pandemic w/few flashy issues, those years of bingo sheets and GOTV info matter. Incumbents (or those inheriting strong local machines) likely ID'ed their vote better&got them to the advance polls
13. If you're a Green in Moncton Centre and you're seeing a surge -- do you know who those voters are & can you find them on E-Day? Because, say, a Liberal in Moncton Centre will know VERY well where the Liberals are. Could save a few incumbents.
14. Also-regional breakdowns are VERY volatile due to small sample size. But in this race, WHERE the parties gain matters a lot. And again, looking at several polls and finding commonalities can help (but caution is really needed with regional numbers).
15. Here are some commonalities -- the PCs dominate Saint John's CMA. Moncton-last two polls both show modest but relevant PC gains. Fredericton is most volatile, pollsters are showing a late Green surge and Grit weakness, maybe a PANB recovery.
16. There's no sign of a PC recovery in the North, but the good news for them is that means the inefficient vote advantage is still there. The Greens HAVE gained as the northern alternative to the Libs, but that may not move many seats.
17. What's it all mean? Well, a lot of safe incumbents in the North and rural South. And a few key ridings could mean the difference between Premier Higgs getting a majority and a scenario where Mr. Vickers backs into a coalition with Green support.
18. (On that note, remember that some races matter more than others if traditional alliances hold. A PC taking Fton-York from PANB, or a Lib comeback in Tantramar doesn't change the balance. Libs winning Miramichi or PCs winning Fton North...matters a LOT).
19. The most vital ridings list has shifted a bit, as I read the polls. I'd upgrade Moncton East & South as vital for the PCs. If they have gained in that area as the last 2 polls suggest (and the gain isn't coming from Dieppe seats) then they need Mssrs Turner and Allain to win.
20. The next most likely seats to take the PCs from 21 (their 2018 baseline w/Shippagan reassigned) are SJ Harbour (usually tight but BIG regional surge) and Carleton-Victoria (demographically Tory but an excellent Lib organization) and Fton North (Lib collapse but a Green rise)
21. There are 2 PANB seats they could convert as well (as stated above flipping Lib seats is more vital for keeping power, but they'd like a majority w/o the purple chaperone, I'm sure). Fton-York should be theirs, and you saw Austin name check Minto a LOT. That would be 28.
22. The big Liberal problem -- down from their 2018 numbers, what seat can they flip? Miramichi is a must, and Vickers is likely to win but nervous. He shouted out a LOT in the last debate, too, and seeing his manager attack Conroy's EA on Twitter suggests their polling is close.
23. They have a great candidate in Oromocto-Lincoln, but their Fredericton numbers and organization is collapsing. When you run a candidate you banned last election in Hanwell, where Cindy Miles almost won, you know you're slipping in Fton. Greens are taking votes & talent away.
24. Even if EKOS is right, the Lib scenario is (a) hold what you got, somehow, (b) flip the Chi (c) catch a vote split surprise somewhere in an urban centre and (d) be nice to the Greens and hope red + Green = 25. And this is NOT impossible. Vickers can still be premier.
25. (At some point, spotting the Libs 15 Northern seats will hurt the Tories. It just may not be this point.)
26. Green incumbents look safe. The student vote drop won't bother Mitton - party vote is up & she's a good riding MLA. If Fton surge is real, Luke Randall will be in good shape (if early polls showing the PCs above 40 hold, then Jill Green is a good candidate).
27. The northern Green gains may not amount to much, given there's no vote split and many Libs have machines and 40 point leads to start. But Charles Theriault, like Kevin Arseneau in 2018, has built an organization & has a real identity. He may overperform and win.
28. The late movement in polls suggest that Kris Austin has put himself back in the race. But his schedule and rhetoric suggest Roy Wiggins has a shot. At this point, a good night for them would be holding 2 of 3 seats. Rick Desaulniers is going to need a vote split miracle.
29. Last point - there WILL be a surprise. Demographics and buzz were on the side of a few winners last time -- Andrea Anderson Mason, Michelle Conroy, and Kevin Arseneau -- but they all won handily and pundits weren't predicting that. Here are a few scenarios that are PLAUSIBLE:
30. Those late Green urban numbers have a high MoE, but there might be a 6th seat in there for them. I'd watch, in order, Moncton Centre, Fton York, Oromocto-Lincoln, Moncton East, Fton Hanwell, or SJ Harbour. No one of those is >50%, but that among them there could be a shocker.
31. Other sleepers -- there's PA buzz in Carleton, and the EKOS numbers are just enough to hint at a sleeper vote. The Green northern surge could lead to a PC northern seat w/a good candidate -- I'd watch the Northwest. There's a non-zero scenario where Austin loses, Conroy wins.
32. Well, that's it. Hope you enjoyed the rant. As always, we have a lot of good people running. They can't all win, so take time to express your gratitude to those who do. It's scary putting yourself out there and risking a public loss. That good people do it anyway matters.
33. Oh yeah....my predictions:

PC 26, Lib 16, Greens 6, PA 1

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kelly Lamrock

Kelly Lamrock Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KLamrock

Jun 24, 2022
Today’s news from the US Supreme Court should make it clear: there is a global movement to change what “freedom” means.

Remember “My right to swing my arm ends at your face”?

Welcome to “My freedom is violated if I can’t punch you in the face.”

It’s just who gets to punch who.
Nationalism creates a collective right to a certain culture. This concept of “freedom” means that individuals cannot be free to challenge the culture. Individuals of the majority culture must be “free” to limit and punish choices that alter the culture.
The goal here is to break the system and destroy institutions. Nationalism understands that free individuals will choose immigration, diversity, marriage equality, religious freedom, bodily autonomy. The free market will move companies/culture to follow those individual choices.
Read 17 tweets
Jun 19, 2020
Been interesting watching justifications offered by some MLAs for voting against Bill 11, or the “vaccinate-if-you-wish-to-use-public-schools” bill. Obviously some want to find a pro-vaccine way to say no to this rule. Here’s why I find those arguments unconvincing. (Thread)
1. Some argue that they will enforce vaccines IF shown proof that the numbers threaten herd immunity (95%). It’s a tempting way to avoid making people mad, but...

Is it logical to say you support choice, but only until 6% make that choice, then you‘ll ban it?

An example....
2. Let’s say we give out bobbleheads at a Royals game.We want every child to get one. We have 500 toys & 450 kids. Some adults push into the line.

Do we say “Meh, let it go until we count 51 adults pushing”? Or have a GLOBAL rule that ALL adults have a duty to let kids go first?
Read 20 tweets
Feb 15, 2020
Hey gang...quick story and life lesson. So, last night, my daughter Kayleigh played her last high school basketball game. Season didn’t end the way they wanted but, of course, for all but one team it ends with a loss.
Of all the gifts the game of basketball gave me, the greatest was to share 13 years of learning it with my daughter. I’m going to miss the car rides, the practices, and watching her play.
When she started I coached her K-2 YBC team — the Fearsome Marysville Suns. It was not, of course, elite basketball. They wobbled up the court, and by year’s end some would pass and play defense.
Read 10 tweets
Jun 11, 2018
So, I’ve been asked by folks in #Nbpoli about this Brian Kenny interview today. Ministers matter, so I will respectfully reply.

'Stability' of school system pushed test scores upward, education minister says | CBC News cbc.ca/news/canada/ne…
1. I get a bit worried when a minister says that test results from early 2016 reflect a plan released in September 2016. It suggests perhaps a shaky grasp of policy, a hyperpartisan bent, or worst of all an inability to grasp the concept of time and the temporal plane. #nbpoli
2. I would expect a minister to join in a sincere examination of what worked, and what didn’t. He may, of course, reach different conclusions. But what are we to make of a minister who yells “We did it! Us!” when his govt planned 5 of these kids’ 102 months in school pre-test?
Read 12 tweets
Jun 5, 2018
I've promised a Twitter essay on some big education news in #nbpoli for a while. Here goes.

Those who care about literacy and education policy, it's worth plowing through. I promise.
1. So, the Pan-Canadian Assessment Programme (PCAP) reported earlier this month. That's where provincial governments measure their student performance in reading, math and science.

Report here: cmec.ca/Publications/L…
2. The 2016 report on Grade 8s would deal with children who began Kindergarten in 2007-08. That's actually the cohort that has the highest Grade 2 literacy scores in NB history.
Read 27 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(