He are seeking to impose marriage equality under Hindu Marriage Act. The Act does not say that marriage has to take place between a man and a woman: Adv Raghav Awasthi for the Petitioners.
#SupremeCourt order on #straydogs is out. “City hounded by strays, kids pay price.” Here are the 10 crucial takeaways from the judgment
1. Dog pay price, kids pay price
The court called the situation extremely grim. There were more than 37 lakh reported dog bites in 2024, including 25,201 in Delhi alone. Infants, young children, the elderly and the homeless are the most vulnerable. Rabies means certain death if not treated in time.
#straydogsdelhi
2. Immediate pickup from NCR localities
Delhi, MCD, NDMC, NOIDA, Ghaziabad, Gurugram and Faridabad have been told to start picking up stray dogs from all areas, starting with the most vulnerable localities. If needed, a dedicated force should be created. Any resistance will attract the strictest action.
3. No release back on streets
Once a dog is captured, it must be kept in a shelter or pound. It cannot be sent back to the locality. The court has warned that if even one dog is released back, stern action will follow.
4. Mandatory shelter creation in 8 weeks Authorities must set up shelters across NCR within eight weeks. They should have sufficient space, trained staff and veterinary facilities. CCTV cameras are to be installed to ensure no dogs are removed or released.
5. Humane care in shelters
The court said there must be no mistreatment or cruelty. Shelters must not be overcrowded. Dogs must be fed regularly and given timely medical care. At least two responsible staff members must be present at all times. Weak and vulnerable dogs should be kept separately.
Delhi High Court refused to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) concerning illegal construction in a village on the border of Delhi and Haryana.
Counsel for petitioner - In the area of the village, they are running cafes, banquet halls. The entire area is affected. The road is used for commute. A marriage procession causes traffic.
Chief Justice - Whether construction of these banquet halls are banned by law?
Supreme Court hears plea by the Governor of Kerala in his capacity as Chancellor of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, challenging a High Court ruling which upheld the State government’s authority to recommend temporary VCs.
Bench: Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan
A fresh application has been filed by the State of Kerala challenging an earlier notification by the Governor (Chancellor) that had re-appointed Dr. K Sivaprasad as a temporary VC of the University.
AG R Venkataramani: the governer has issued an order entirely in terms of the Court’s orders. Their request is that an interim VC can be appointed unless we give a recommendation to the chancellor don’t pick up the interim VC.
Delhi Government tells the Delhi High Court that nine jail officials have been suspended over allegations of inmates and jail authorities running an extortion racket at Tihar Jail.
The Bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela today heard the matter.
Chief Justice - Pursuant to our order, an application has been moved by Principal Secretary, GNCTD seeking a week’s time to comply with earlier directions.
Supreme Court hears suo motu case on deforestation in Hyderabad’s Kancha Gachibowli area, over felling of trees near University of Hyderabad.
Bench: Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran.
In the last hearing, court observed that while sustainable development is important, it does not mean that forests can be destroyed overnight with bulldozers.
The Court had earlier warned the Telangana government of stern action if it fails to take steps to restore the lost forest cover.
Supreme Court hears ED plea challenging bail granted to Nagpur-based trader Wasim Bawla for his alleged involvement in the smuggling of foreign-origin betel nuts through the India-Myanmar border.
Bench: Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandan.
Order: Learned counsel submitted that the learned judge of the High Court erred in granting bail in such serious offence.
Order: The learned judge, by an elaborate order, found the petitioner entitled to bail. While granting bail, the judge observed that the principal accused was at liberty and, as such, the petitioner could not be denied bail.