Former civil servants from an informal collective "Constitutional Conduct Group" seek to intervene in a plea before the Supreme Court against @SudarshanNewsTV 's #UPSCJihad program on the issue of recruitment of Muslims in UPSC. @SureshChavhanke @Vakeel_Sb
Plea states that several legal provisions prohibit, criminalize, or otherwise penalize what is colloquially known as "hate speech." The applicants have urged the court to set out the scope and meaning of hate speech for more clarity on the subject.
Supreme Court resumes hearing plea against detention of Ladakh-based activist Sonam Wangchuk under the NSA.
Bench: Justices Aravind Kumar and PB Varale
Sr. Adv. Kapil Sibal (for Wangchuk): I am told by the Solicitor’s office that he will not be able to address the Court till the 26th. At least we must know.
Counsel: there’s a wedding in his family between the 19th and 23rd.
Court: we will let Mr. Sibal complete today. And we will have it again tomorrow. This is a habeas corpus petition. We will have it between 2:45-3:00pm.
Supreme Court to resume hearing its suo motu case on stray dogs today, marking the third consecutive day of proceedings in the matter.
Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria
#Straydogs #SupremeCourt
Yesterday, the court had asked counsel opposing the removal of stray dogs from institutional areas to come prepared on a ToI article titled “On The Roof Of The World, Feral Dogs Hunt Down Ladakh’s Rare Species”.
Supreme Court resumes hearing its suo motu case on stray dogs.
Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria
Amicus Gaurav Agarwal: the 4 remaining states mentioned yesterday have filed their compliances last night. So between yesterday's note and today's note, sixteen states are done, seven are left. I would need one more day to complete that tabular chart.
Sr. Adv CU Singh resumes his arguments.
Singh: apart from the vacuum effect etc mentioned yesterday, there is also a rodent menace. There’s also a problem of monkeys in institutional areas. We have annexed studies. When there is an abrupt removal of dogs, rodent populations shoot up and lead to unintended consequences. There has to be a balance. Your lordships know what happened in Surat 20-30 years ago.
Court: did that have anything to do with removal of dogs? On a lighter note, dogs and cats are enemies. Cats kill rodents so we should promote more cats and less dogs. That would be the solution. Tell us how many dogs you want roaming around in hospital corridors?
Supreme Court resumes hearing its suo motu case on stray dogs.
Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria
On the last hearing, the Court had directed the State governments and NHAI to ensure removal of stray animals from the highways across India. It had also ordered that government and private educational, health institutions should be fenced within 8 weeks to tackle stray dog menace and prevent stray dog bites.
The matter is listed today for monitoring compliance of these directions.
CJI Surya Kant: the amicus has filed a report which has some long term solutions
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: Let us go issue wise..
CJI: Yes we don't want to be super experts but a forum where expert opinions can be placed so that best practice can be adopted.
CJI: It is being said that heavy vehicles are contributing to it and then there is construction in NCR area..people need housing. So we have to see if construction is contributing it. If CAQM wants to come now after 2 months is not possible. That is like it's failing in its duty.
CJI: As I am speaking... vehicular pollution is now contributing to 40 percent.
Amicus: 2022 report of CAQM had conducted an exercise... But the plan is not in public domain
Supreme Court hears plea by Telangana government seeking directions to halt the expansion works allegedly being undertaken by the Andhra Pradesh government to link the Polavaram project to Banakacherla or Nallamala Sagar without the required statutory approvals
Sr Adv AM Singhvi argues
#SupremeCourt
Sr Adv Singhvi: Addition of lift component near barrages was also not discarded. CWC just last month directed that no in principle consent should be given. The committee cannot be rendered infructuous before it is made.
CJI Kant: We are seeing whether there is a violation or attempt to violate the award by AP govt. Polavaram project is a central govt project and you are correct that nothing can be added or diverted without permission of centre.. so you can write to the committee