A Justice Ashok Bhushan led bench of the Supreme Court will today hear an anticipatory bail plea filed by former Punjab Director General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini---an accused in the 1991 Balwant Singh Multani murder case
Saini has challenged the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s September 7 order dismissing his anticipatory bail plea in the Multani kidnapping and murder case.
@PunjabPoliceInd have also filed a caveat to pre-empt Saini from getting any ex-parte relief from the top court.
Senior Adv Mukul Rohatgi appears for Saini: This is a very serious matter. My client has risen from the ranks who became the DGP. he was a decorated officer and was in the thick of militancy in Punjab. He suffered 5 bullet injuries.
Rohatgi: When Multani, the assailant had escaped from jail. After his escape, his father filed a habeas corpus. It was rejected as state said he escaped since he was a proclaimed offender.
Rohatgi: court had entertained an IA by the father of Multani to find what happened to his son. The judge started the matter in an already disposed off the matter. State govt appealed this. SC held judge had no fresh material to order a CBI probe and thus it was quashed
Rohatgi: SC however said that the father can still file a complaint to any appropriate authority. Punjab submitted that terrorists had made an attempt to kill the then SSP, Saini was the then SSP.
Rohatgi: How can the plea on a same subject matter be entertained after its disposal? Especiallt after a 10 years delay from the SC decision.
Rohatgi: It has been 29 years since Multani escaped. His son has now filed an FIR now regarding his father's disappearance. This FIR is registered on Day 1. They are aware of the SC judgment.
Rohatgi: This FIR was regiatered in a mala fide fashion. Saini is retired now and I was also granted anticipatory bail by the district court. Now the complainant who is brother of the Police officer chalked all of this.
Rohatgi: Now the other 2 PO's who were accused with me got bail and turned approvers. Such an anticipatory bail should run till the end in view of Pradeep Ram verdict
Rohatgi: Now one district judge has recalled the order of the other district Judge. How can this be done? It was noted that bail was granted at a nascent stage. 30 years is nascent stage??
Rohatgi: The government is after me because I had filed two chargesheets which has the current chief minister of Punjab @capt_amarinder as the accused. This is why they are after me !
Senior Adv Siddharth Luthra: it is unfortunate that Mr Rohatgi is attributing motive to the judge. On the aspect of 2011 verdict of this court, let me make the submissions.
Luthra: There is a man called Multani who was picked up from his residence
Justice Bhushan: This case is of 1991. After 30 years what is the hurry to arrest him
Luthra: Post registration of FIR, statememt of approved has been recorded. Witnesses in the police station have for the first time stated that the picture of Multani released to have escaped from the prison was not Multani at all.
Luthra: P&H HC judge had noted that this man used to intimidate. Court had noted that a person had succumbed to his injury after he was imhumanly treated by the applicant.
Justice Bhushan: We will grant you time to file a reply
Luthra: After his retirement, the accused still has the audacity and power to have some files in his control. How can this be allowed?
Senior Adv KV Vishwanathan appears for the brother of Multani: My father went to HC as SC kept that option open. He was a notorious police officer. As a legal heir I am here today.
Vishwanathan: Murder offence was disclosed on August 18. This Section 302 was added. There is approver statement on record now.
Senior Adv Vishwanatha reads the Sushila Aggrawal case. If anticipatory bail is rejected then arrest can be made
Supreme Court orders no arrest till state replies. Notice issued. Returnable after 2 weeks.
Order modified: reply in 3 weeks. Rejoinder thereafter in one week.
Supreme Court to hear a batch of petitions challenging the Calcutta High Court's order which set aside the appointments in over 24,000 teaching and non-teaching posts in government schools #SupremeCourt @MamataOfficial
Sr Adv Vibha Datta Makhija: we would need two days.
CJI Sanjiv Khanna: Yes let us start. No piecemeal arguments.
State: Let the state start.
Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi begins for state of West Bengal
Supreme Court hears appeal challenging the Madras High Court's decision to allow Carnatic vocalist TM Krishna to receive the Sangita Kalanidhi MS Subbulakshmi Award.
ASG Venkataraman: Award was
conferred and it was greatly publicised. He is a person who made misogynistic comment against her
#SupremeCourt
ASG: the single judge order is in effect. The music academy could not have given the award yersterday. Can an injunction be breached and a public act be committee? Court is not powerless.
ASG: the court can stay this award or till suit is pending the fourth respondent cannot use the name of the award at all
Sr Adv Gopal Sankarnarayanan: Fourth respondent is not represented here as of now.
- Allu Arjun is being represented by G Ashok Reddy
- Justice Juvvadi Sridevi to hear the matter
Justice Sridevi to hear the matter at 4 PM
#AlluArjun #ALLUARJUNARRESTED
Actor Allu Arjun was arrested after he visited Sandhya Theatre on December 4, 2024 to watch #Pushpa2. His security staff pushed general public and commotion caused a death of 39 year old. Her husband filed an FIR holding #AlluArjun & Management responsible for her death.
Bhushan Steel insolvency case: #SupremeCourt to shortly hear the case
Earlier Enforcement Directorate (ED) has stated that its appeal against JSW Steel's takeover of Bhushan Power and Steel might not be required to be argued in view of Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)
Adv Zoheb Hossain: if the relief can be moulded then the plea can be disposed off.
Justice Bela Trivedi: are you appearing on behalf of SG Mehta?
Hossain: Attachment by ED has been made after the approval of plan by NCLT.. thus prayer can be considered. If it is restored then let the attachment be restored to resolution professional under 8(8).
Justice Trivedi: We will not pass any piecemeal orders.
Tempers flare in #SupremeCourt amid hearing in case concerning adv Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal; Court urges lawyers to maintain discipline.
Court: If all of you behave like this ... Don’t you know this being livestreamed? Don’t you know these things are going in public domain?
Court: Don’t you think that this kind of behaviour inside the courtroom – what kind of impression is being given to the public? What kind of message is being given, you are officers of the Court all of you!
#SupremeCourt #CourtroomExchange
Court: Lot of training is required to be given to the bar also. We are sorry with the way you are going ahead ... You don't have any decorum to maintain in court?
#BREAKING: Supreme Court issues notice on plea challenging constitutional validity of provisions of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986
Bench: Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan
#UPGangstersAct
Senior Adv R Basant (appears for Petitioner): Whether only on basis of one base case another case under the act can be registered by the police itself. Furthermore, police is complainant, prosecutor and adjudicator under provisions of the act. Please note. This is important
Sr Adv Basant: Also, under this Act, without even a case of FIR against a person, its entire property are allowed to be attached. This aspect came up in Dharmendra Kirthal (2013) 8 SCC 368 as well and the court had issued notice but later did not consider the issue.