A Justice Ashok Bhushan led bench of the Supreme Court will today hear an anticipatory bail plea filed by former Punjab Director General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini---an accused in the 1991 Balwant Singh Multani murder case
Saini has challenged the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s September 7 order dismissing his anticipatory bail plea in the Multani kidnapping and murder case.
@PunjabPoliceInd have also filed a caveat to pre-empt Saini from getting any ex-parte relief from the top court.
Senior Adv Mukul Rohatgi appears for Saini: This is a very serious matter. My client has risen from the ranks who became the DGP. he was a decorated officer and was in the thick of militancy in Punjab. He suffered 5 bullet injuries.
Rohatgi: When Multani, the assailant had escaped from jail. After his escape, his father filed a habeas corpus. It was rejected as state said he escaped since he was a proclaimed offender.
Rohatgi: court had entertained an IA by the father of Multani to find what happened to his son. The judge started the matter in an already disposed off the matter. State govt appealed this. SC held judge had no fresh material to order a CBI probe and thus it was quashed
Rohatgi: SC however said that the father can still file a complaint to any appropriate authority. Punjab submitted that terrorists had made an attempt to kill the then SSP, Saini was the then SSP.
Rohatgi: How can the plea on a same subject matter be entertained after its disposal? Especiallt after a 10 years delay from the SC decision.
Rohatgi: It has been 29 years since Multani escaped. His son has now filed an FIR now regarding his father's disappearance. This FIR is registered on Day 1. They are aware of the SC judgment.
Rohatgi: This FIR was regiatered in a mala fide fashion. Saini is retired now and I was also granted anticipatory bail by the district court. Now the complainant who is brother of the Police officer chalked all of this.
Rohatgi: Now the other 2 PO's who were accused with me got bail and turned approvers. Such an anticipatory bail should run till the end in view of Pradeep Ram verdict
Rohatgi: Now one district judge has recalled the order of the other district Judge. How can this be done? It was noted that bail was granted at a nascent stage. 30 years is nascent stage??
Rohatgi: The government is after me because I had filed two chargesheets which has the current chief minister of Punjab @capt_amarinder as the accused. This is why they are after me !
Senior Adv Siddharth Luthra: it is unfortunate that Mr Rohatgi is attributing motive to the judge. On the aspect of 2011 verdict of this court, let me make the submissions.
Luthra: There is a man called Multani who was picked up from his residence
Justice Bhushan: This case is of 1991. After 30 years what is the hurry to arrest him
Luthra: Post registration of FIR, statememt of approved has been recorded. Witnesses in the police station have for the first time stated that the picture of Multani released to have escaped from the prison was not Multani at all.
Luthra: P&H HC judge had noted that this man used to intimidate. Court had noted that a person had succumbed to his injury after he was imhumanly treated by the applicant.
Justice Bhushan: We will grant you time to file a reply
Luthra: After his retirement, the accused still has the audacity and power to have some files in his control. How can this be allowed?
Senior Adv KV Vishwanathan appears for the brother of Multani: My father went to HC as SC kept that option open. He was a notorious police officer. As a legal heir I am here today.
Vishwanathan: Murder offence was disclosed on August 18. This Section 302 was added. There is approver statement on record now.
Senior Adv Vishwanatha reads the Sushila Aggrawal case. If anticipatory bail is rejected then arrest can be made
Supreme Court orders no arrest till state replies. Notice issued. Returnable after 2 weeks.
Order modified: reply in 3 weeks. Rejoinder thereafter in one week.
Plea by Delhi CM & AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate in Delhi excise policy scam to be mentioned before CJI DY Chandrachud led bench at 10:30 am
All eyes on Court 1 of Supreme Court
The three-judge bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud to assemble shortly
Sr Adv AM Singhvi with his battery of juniors in the front row all set for the mentioning
@ArvindKejriwal
#ArvindKejriwalArrested #ArvindKejriwal #SupremeCourt
@AamAadmiParty
@dir_ed
The sitting of the Delhi assembly session has been cancelled
AAP leader Atishi Marlena has stated that Arvind Kejriwal will run the Delhi government from Jail
Kejriwal also to be produced in a Delhi court today. His medical examination was completed today morning
@ArvindKejriwal
#ArvindKejriwalArrested #ArvindKejriwal #SupremeCourt
@AamAadmiParty
@dir_ed
#Breaking
“Don’t underestimate Indian voters. They know who is leading and who is misleading.”
Delhi High Court rejects a PIL seeking directions to ECI and MHA to act against Rahul Gandhi, Akhilesh Yadav and Arvind Kejriwal for making "misleading and false statements" damaging the "credibility of Republic of India”.
A man named Surjit Singh Yadav had filed a PIL alleging that Gandhi, Kejriwal and Yadav had defamed the government of India by claiming that the Central government waived of loans worth almost ₹16 lakh crore of the industrialists.
Yadav claimed to be a farmer and a social activist and stated that the statements by the opposition politicians has resulted in creating a negative image of India and degraded the country's and central government's credibility.
Yadav further claimed that these statements may affect foreign investment and tourism and promote anarchy.
#SupremeCourt Five - Judge bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud to hear the case where it sought reply from SBI as to why electoral bond numbers were not disclosed
#ElectoralBondsCase @ECISVEEP
SCBA President Adish Aggarwala mentions a letter seeking sup Motu review of the electoral bonds judgment.
CJI DY Chandrachud: Apart from being a senior counsel, you are president of SCBA. You have written a letter invoking my suo Motu powers. These are all publicity related stuff and we will not get into this. Do not make me say anything more. It will be distasteful.
CJI: We had asked all details to be disclosed by SBI which includes electoral bond numbers as well. LET SBI not be SELECTIVE in disclosure, do not wait for orders, we believe that SBI will be candid and fair to the court. We want all information related to the electoral bonds to be disclosed which is in your possession. As chairman of SBI every part of info on electoral bonds had to be disclosed and it was to have all conceivable info related to the #ElectoralBonds @TheOfficialSBI