Peter Foster Profile picture
Sep 15, 2020 20 tweets 28 min read Read on X
🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺🚢🚚🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🚨NEW: nearly 2/3 customs agents say they don’t have enough staff to handle coming border, per survey of @BIFA members...my latest via @FT and why companies are struggling to prepare. 1/thread
on.ft.com/2ZB9yqJ
@BIFA @FT I'm not going to rehears entire border issues again (see threads passim) but a couple of key takeaways

1) #Covid19 has made it worse

2) companies still need details; Border Operating Model in July has not answered many Qs

(full release @BIFA here)/2

bifa.org/news/articles/…
@BIFA @FT So as Robert Keen @BIFA_DG tells me, in a survey back in May "only" 50% of members said they'd be short of staff - now its 64% - which tallies with members raising concerns on Covid-19 /3
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG Because while it is true that Govt has put £50m into increasing numbers/training the reality is that many freight forwarding companies (whose staff will facilitate new border processes) have been furloughing staff dealing with Covid cashflow crunch...not rushing to take on risk/4
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG This is why Richard Burnett @RHARichardB and others have been banging on about government need to intervene more actively in a commercial marketplace that Whitehall (and politicians) are failing to understand the dynamics of (see 4, above) /5
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB The result as @RHARichardB @BIFA_DG and experts like @AnnaJerzewska say is that we're nowhere close to being ready for Jan 1 - deal or no deal.

But it's not just about the 50,000 customs clearance experts that don't yet exist...the chronic lack of info. For EG.../6
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska As @AnnaJerzewska tells me, the government has said that business will be eligible for simplified eligibility requirements for CCG Comprehensive Customs Guarantee (duty deferral) and Entry in Declarant's Records (EIDR) status (for checks at warehouse)...BUT no guidance, as yet /7
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska The result is that business is getting conflicting advice, says @AnnaJerzewska on whether they should hold out for simplified regime, or protect themselves by getting full registrations. The result is stasis/confusion etc. /8
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska FWIW I did ask the Cabinet Office (which runs the Border Delivery Group) for guidance on WHEN these details will be shared with relevant businesses. Back came the reply: "in due course".

Yes, that is the sound of hair follicles being torn from scalps /9
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska This is the problem - it's not just about customs agents or form filling - but about all the actors - hauliers, brokers, relevant government departments, port authorities and traders - working in concert with each other. Which brings us to IT..../10
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska The government has a new Goods Vehicle Management System (GVMS) and the Smart Freight Service app in order for hauliers to check they're good to go and not turn Kent into a lorry park....but it's still not available for users to train on. In fact..../11
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska According to @lisaocarroll scoop this AM on slides shared with Cab Cmme responsible for all this, "beta testing" on Smart Freight won't start "until the end of November". Wow. Let's hope its not integral to the system in any way. /12

theguardian.com/politics/2020/…
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska @lisaocarroll If you want a broader view of the issues - which really centre on trader readiness and their capacity to get ready when they wake up to the scale of change coming, last week's select committee with @AnnaJerzewska @RHARichardB @RobHardyFR8 is here/13

parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/d0…
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska @lisaocarroll @RobHardyFR8 So what is going on? Why is the government so apparently cavalier about industry warnings/frustrations...and the risks of 'no deal', which they just made much higher by putting a gun to EU heads over the Irish Protocol? /14
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska @lisaocarroll @RobHardyFR8 Good Q, to which you hear a variety of answers from Whitehall insiders and industry...

One is that that Frost and co have actually given up on getting a zero tariff/zero quota deal on terms they find acceptable... hence move to re-write NI Protocol /15
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska @lisaocarroll @RobHardyFR8 There is a brute logic to this, since the Protocol as negotiated is incompatible with an ultra-sovereigntist view of Brexit which is the logic for refusing to agree sufficient State Aid/LPF elements to get the zero/zero deal you need to make NI Protocol work /16
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska @lisaocarroll @RobHardyFR8 If that's right - and who knows, but it logical inference of the way that UK Internal Market bill is drafted (see Section 45 totally disapplying the Protocol) - and you know the border is going to be a mess, there is political logic in having "EU intransigence" to blame /17
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska @lisaocarroll @RobHardyFR8 No matter that Article 16 of the Protocol and the Arbitration mechanism in the Withdrawal Agreement gives you plenty of ways to address your concerns...no-one will say it right out, but on one reading, this is now just blame game management /18
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska @lisaocarroll @RobHardyFR8 Or not. Perhaps its an honest calculation that the EU will do a 'zero/zero' deal with no UK State Aid regulator + re-write the NI Protocol in face of UK aggression. That EU leaders' will intervene.

Or perhaps both - i.e. an acceptance UK can live with either outcome? /19
@BIFA @FT @BIFA_DG @RHARichardB @AnnaJerzewska @lisaocarroll @RobHardyFR8 But with friction coming to the border deal or 'no deal' (it'll be worse in a 'no deal' but no-one can say for sure how much worse, so easy to put those fears aside) it seems clear that "chaos in Kent" will not be much of a determining factor. Seat belts please. ENDS

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Foster

Peter Foster Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pmdfoster

Jan 27
NEW: Gove’s top-down plan to build 150,000 houses in Cambridge by 2040 declared “nonsensical” by local council leaders because they don’t have water supply to build existing plan for 50,000 by that date! 🤯 But Gove keeps giving interviews promising it/1

ft.com/content/d1c0bf…
“The 150,000 homes would appear to just be nonsensical, if I’m honest, because the infrastructure just isn’t there,” Mike Davey, @mikelode1 Labour leader of Cambridge City Council /2
@mikelode1 “We are a pro-growth council, but we’ve run out of water. So that leaves us with a lot of questions about how this can be delivered. Gove has to solve the water problem and the energy problem or it can’t be done,” Bridget Smith, LD leader of South Cambridgeshire @cllrbridget /3
Read 8 tweets
Sep 19, 2023
David Frosts column on #Brexit this morning goes in three phases:

- gaslighting readers over his “thin” deal being actually fat 🙄

- some actual truth on UK as rule taker

- and then total failure to admit he’s responsible for this mess 🧵1/4

telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/09/1…
First the gaslighting: his deal is a ‘reverse’ trade deal…it erects barriers, it doesn’t remove them. It’s only “broadest deal ever” if UK started from zero relations, rather than working down from Single Market membership. As he well knows, but I wonder about the readers.😬 /2 Image
Second the one bit of truth. To get closer to EU and fix bits of his rubbish deal, the UK will become a big rule taker. That will be hard. What Frost omits to say is that’s a pure function of the hideous position his #Brexit deal has put the UK in. And no seat at the table. /3 Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 18, 2023
🚨🚨when ministers aren’t bashing UK universities they love to boast about them. Rightly. But unless something changes on funding there will be a lot less to boast about in 10 years time. /1

Here’s why via @ft Big Read…

on.ft.com/3rtAhGF
As Simon Marginson Higher Education prof at Oxford University explains the UK is in danger of getting back to the funding crisis levels that sparked need for tuition fees…/2 Image
These charts by @amy_borrett explain the basic problem. Triple whammy of inflation, #Brexit and risky over reliance on international students to x-subsidise undergrad teaching (previously used to make up research grant shortfalls). /3


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 29, 2023
Went to the Midlands to talk to UK manufacturers about slow #Brexit strangle. @MakeUK_ CEO Stephen Phipson summed up the challenge:

"The question we must ask is, ‘would Airbus make all their wings in the UK, if they were making that decision now’?” /1

https://t.co/YwerpUopHKft.com/content/2f99a9…


What he's getting at is that #Brexit is not, as is still widely supposed, a one-off event that companies adjust to.

It's a permanent friction that makes UK companies a risker bet for your supply chain than an EU company. And that matters for maufacturing/2
That's because 50 per cent of UK exports are from manufacturing, and of those that go to EU, around 50 per cent feed into EU supply chains -- so they make bits of things that criss-cross Europe to become whole things that then get exported to rest of world. /3
Read 12 tweets
Mar 22, 2023
This was interesting session. The 'chart wars' are a bit baffling if you're not an economist. I'm not. But I am a reporter. Gudgin argued #Brexit had no effect on the economy, but I don't know how that squares with all the conversations I've had with business in last 6 years/1
I get you can argue over the quantum of #brexit impact -- Springford model says -5.5% GDP, Portes reckons that fees too high, says thinks -2.5%...Jessop said -1%, but transitory...but "nothing" surely doesn't pass the sniff-test (to quote Gudgen on Springford's Doppelgangers /2
The empircal work by Jun Du at Warwick and Thomas Sampson at LSE on the numbers of traded lines/relationships, for example, can't amount to "nothing"; nor can UK parlous trade performance; even if non-differentiated impact on EU v RoW exports isn't yet explained/3
Read 6 tweets
Mar 22, 2023
Graham Gudgin says that @JohnSpringford "doppelganger" method of analysing Brexit is a "statistical artefact" -- one that is used by Office of Budget Responsibility in their March 2023 forecast.

obr.uk/docs/dlm_uploa… == see p.47
Gudgin concludes that Brexit has had no real impact on UK economy. And talk about Brexit masks real reason for productivity crunch. OBR, Bank of England, CER etc and BBC/FT that report these studies are distracting.
Now @JohnSpringford responds to criticisms of his doppelganger method. Says that its misleading to compare individual countries. The Doppelganger composite smooths out differences, which is why it makes better counterfactual.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(