I differ with stay on #BindasBol on @SudarshanNewsTV. I have been a panelist and provided them data analysis which was used for program. Here is where Justice Chandrachud has misunderstood things. +
No insinuation has been made on Muslim community that they are trying to infiltrate UPSC. The program has used data and information available in public domain to claim that there are reasons to believe that some elements have religious agenda to infiltrate UPSC.
As evidence, presentation from Zakat Foundation has been shown where it clearly establishes Dalits as its adversaries and wants Muslims to dominate bureaucracy. Why is it banned in democracy to raise alarm on this?
Hon Judge raised alarm over use of ISIS imagery to vilify Muslims. That is false accusation. The ISIS imagery was used because certain foreign donors of Zakat Foundation have also been linked to funding ISIS and Al Qaeda. This is as per FCRA records and publicly available info.+
Further Hon Judge has condemned that an institute like UPSC's credibility is questioned. Why is that wrong in democracy. Public is ruler and these institutions are servants. How can democracy subvert right to question. Further, +
these were not vague allegations. I did data analysis and found that M get higher marks in interviews year after year, while they score lower or equal in written exams. I tested it statistically and found its probability of occurrence to be less than 50 heads in row +
Now that is maths. Only way to refute it is to bring out mistakes in my calculations. But how can anyone say that one cannot question an event with probability of less than 1 in millions just because UPSC cannot be questioned. +
The same honorable judge once said that dissent is safety valve of democracy. Why curb dissent now, especially when backed with data and evidences? Why not simply get it all probed and explain why all the evidences provided still do not provide the true picture? +
With due respect to Supreme Court and law of the land, I will bring out more and more evidences to point at lacunae in system and why I trust my data analysis than UPSC's selection process. I believe this is necessary for democracy. Afterall, our slogan is Satyameva Jayate.+
Will be happy to be corrected. Am not making any accusations. But providing facts. Let public decide. I invite all to refute whatever evidence has been brought so far and will be brought out in future. That will be right way towards Satyameva Jayate. Bless me.🙏

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Sanjeev Newar संजीव नेवर

Sanjeev Newar संजीव नेवर Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SanjeevSanskrit

25 Sep
It is impossible to trust anything from fake news peddler @newslaundry. Here I give examples to show why @newslaundry is fake news. +
Newslaundry introduced a full time Congress worker as a practicing doctor in AIIMS and circulated his fake diagnosis.
The fake news peddler @newslaundry concocted a lie that a mandir was cleaned after President's entry because he is a Dalit. Later it pulled down the report when exposed.
Read 6 tweets
24 Sep
Western notion of LGBTIQ and Kinnar, Shikhandi, Hijra in Bharat are two diff things. Whatever be ur stand, one should be clear of this diff. LGBTIQ does not have a direct biological basis as per research so far. It is a choice which some suspect to be partially due to biology.
Often, many believe that transgender are LGBTIQ. No. Transgender is a biological condition. And hence irrespective of debates on LGBTIQ issue, they are as sammanit in all aspects as male and female genders.
T in LGBTIQ is not transgender but transsexual which is psychological.
The other crucial aspect ignored in this debate is the Bharatiya emphasis on self control aka Brahmacharya. Be you gay or straight, the urge for purposeless sex must be controlled. This is message of Gita, Vedas, and all Dharmik texts. Krishna is supercritical of lust.
Read 4 tweets
22 Sep
A lot of people call me Tattiveer. Am proud of it. Even @narendramodi must know about this.

My childhood was spent in Kolkata where waterlogging was common. Since childhood I saw my father and grandfather (who are no more) take long bamboo skin (baanspatti) + Image
They would get out to lane and road to unclog all drains. Even after IIM convocation, we had waterlogging next day. And we happily celebrated cleaning the entire area. Then, as always, we cleaned toilet before bath. Even till date, I am proud of superior tatti-cleaning skills. +
Even when I stayed in hotels, I always made point to clean my tatti and not outsource to housekeeper. Yes, my khandan taught me this valuable skill. Am proud of it. Feel free to call me tattiveer for my cleaning skills. Or Agniveer for other things I do. Its all same for me. 🙏
Read 4 tweets
21 Sep
.@OpIndia_com is intervening in #UPSC_Jihad case. Its surreal that the issue I raised yrs ago with analysis, RTI with Min Ministry, SC Comm is now at centerstage where so many are joining.

As Harvard said, Data Scientist is sexiest job of 21st century. 😎
This is graphical analysis of marks differences
Read 23 tweets
20 Sep
Was wonderful to interact with Shri @zafarsareshwala ji yesterday on #BindasBol. I asked him certain questions on why Hindu Muslim rifts happen. Am sharing my questions and his response. Share your feedback. 🙏
Q1 - Why non Muslims can't recite Hanuman Chalisa in Jannat? +
Q2 - Why Muslims have crooks like Iqbal, Mughals, Amir Khusro as role models? Why not APJ Abdul Kalam and Ashfaqullah?
Q3 - Why apostasy is so lethal?
Answers of @zafarsareshwala ji
1. Who will go to Jannat, no one knows
2. We appreciate only good things of Khusro, Iqbal, Mughals
Read 5 tweets
18 Sep
Since Supreme Court is hearing on #UPSC_Jihad issue, here is a box-plot diagram of category-wise marks range for Muslims(1) and non-Muslims(0) for 2018.
I believe UPSC must be made a party and asked to explain the difference that remains for last 3 years.
Here is the box-plots for Interview (Personality Test) for 2017. Number 1 represents Muslims. Number 0 represents non-Muslims. Central line in each chart is mean. Top and bottom edges of box represent 25th and 75th percentile.
towardsdatascience.com/understanding-… will explain
Here is the box-plot for 2016. Same pattern as 2018 and 2017. Why?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!