First of all, his bill wouldn't do *anything* unless the #ACA is struck down...which he's repeatedly voted to do and still wants to do.
Secondly, his bill wouldn't do anything *in Colorado* even if the #ACA is struck down because it duplicates existing state law.
Most importantly, his bill would cause premiums for individual market insurance policies to become INSANELY unaffordable, since it includes no financial subsidies or price-gouging protection *and* it does nothing to keep or replace the #ACA's Medicaid expansion provision.
His bill also doesn't include any minimum actuarial value requirement, no caps on out of pocket expenses and a return to annual & lifetime coverage limits. Young adults could no longer stay on their parents plans until age 26 unless your state happens to require it, and so on.
For instance, the orange section here shows what percent of household income a typical family of 4 living in Henrico County, VA has to pay for a benchmark Silver plan (w/#ACA's protections) today (ignore the blue section for now):
Now, the #ACA does have problems; one is that the financial subsidies don't go *far enough*...that's why you see that big spike right at 400% of the Federal Poverty Level (around $105,000/year for a family of 4). That's what the House Dem's #ACA2.0 bill would solve. HOWEVER...
...let's take a look at how much an individual market insurance policy for this same family would cost *without* the #ACA* and under @CoryGardner's bill (roughly):
(this isn't exact, because in Virginia specifically, the children would qualify for Medicaid/CHIP up to 200% FPL; the parents would qualify up to 49% FPL, which is why there's still a narrow slice at the very left side...but you get the idea).
Here's an updated version of my "Dem Stop the Steal!" conspiracy theory thread which hopefully is less scattershot.
There's 3 main claims:
1. "How could there be 20M fewer voters than in 2020 w/"record-breaking turnout?"
2. "How could 15M fewer voter for Harris vs. Biden?"
3. "How could so many swing state voters vote for the Dem for Senate but not for Harris for POTUS?"
There's a few others, but these are the biggest ones, so let's tackle them first:
1. There weren't 20M fewer voters.
I've been compiling the data as it's being updated by CNN's tracking center via a Google spreadsheet. As of this writing, total POTUS turnout is ~147.6M, or ~10.8M lower than 2020's 158.4M.
Yesterday I posted a thread digging into the actual data behind the "20M missing votes!" and "15M fewer than Biden!" conspiracy theories being tossed around the past few days.
Via CNN, as of this writing, total 2024 POTUS votes are only down 13.9 million vs. 2020...with a likely 11.5 - 12.0 million ballots still to be counted across 30 states.
Total 2024 turnout will likely be ~156M or so...just a couple million fewer than 2020.
Again, using CNN's data & estimates, once every legitimate ballot has been counted, Trump will likely have around ~78 million votes to Harris' 75-76 million.
That'd mean he added ~4 million vs 2020 while she lost ~5-6 million.
...the vast majority of this discrepancy happened in districts/counties which were heavily red to begin with, which is why the MAGA COVID Death Cult factor only ended up making a decisive difference in exactly one statewide race: Arizona Attorney General: acasignups.net/22/12/29/updat…
At the House district level it didn't make a decisive difference in any races at all. To understand why, let's look at two extreme examples...
People have started asking why I'm still pushing fundraising for Dems just 5 days before Election Day. All the ad time has been purchased & the lit pieces printed & mailed out already, right?
There's several reasons: 1/
1. For state legislative races in particular, a last-minute cash infusion of even $50 can mean an extra few pizzas for tired & hungry canvassers or an extra burner phone for phone banking.
2. After the polls close, there's going to no doubt be some races which require recounts...which may or may not have to be paid for by the campaign requesting it, depending on the state and the margin. That's gonna cost money.
🧵THE DEAD POOL: Since @MikeJohnson and @JDVance are promising to Concentrate folks w/pre-existing conditions into separate Camps, let's talk about that. 1/ acasignups.net/24/10/04/dead-…
Let's go back to the pre-ACA healthcare landscape. This is what it looked like in 2012...*before* the ACA's major provisions went into effect.
Half the US had employer coverage. Another third had Medicare or Medicaid. ~11M had "individual" insurance; ~48M had nothing at all. 2/
The ACA had 2 main goals:
1. Reduce the number of uninsured Americans as much as possible by making coverage more affordable & accessible;
2. Provide protections from insurance industry abuses, *especially* for the individual market where the abuses were the most blatant. 3/