For those asking, this visualisation is made up exclusively of a single Excel chart (2D scatter plot) that contains multiple series. Some of the data are plotted as lines without markers, some are plotted just with markers. Spin buttons provide real-time updates.
I convert the Keplerian elements for the orbit to Cartesian coordinates and then project the 3D position onto a 2D plane (that is plotted). I do this for true anomaly values between 0 and 360 deg. to get the orbit.
The "Earth" is drawn in the same way. In fact, the lines of longitude are essentially circular, polar "orbits" with radius equal to the Earth radius. Lines of latitude are circular, equatorial orbits that are translated and re-sized.
I use the angle between the orbit radius & the viewer (plus some radius checking) to see if the point is hidden behind the Earth. If it is, I use "#NA" for the coordinates of the point so it is not drawn in the scatter plot. I draw a dashed line with a separate series instead.
The glowing Earth limb is just a circle (with added glow)drawn on the 2D scatter plot with a radius equal to the maximum distance of the Equatorial line from the origin.
It should be straightforward (but time-consuming) to add additional orbits if you wanted to visualise a constellation, for example. As long as you can define the orbit of each plane in the constellation, the same rotations and projections will apply. That's something I will add.
I am also aiming to add a conversion to latitude and longitude so that the ground track over several orbits can be visualised.
Please get in touch if you have any other suggestions for additions!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Welcome to this month's look at #Starlink conjunction risk mitigation manoeuvres. Through 30 April 2023, I estimate that Starlink satellites have made a total of > 45,000 manoeuvres to mitigate the risk of colliding with other space objects [1/n]
A better relationship to consider is the one between the (cumulative) number of manoeuvres and the (cumulative) number of Starlink satellites launched. The growth is a non-linear function of the number of Starlink satellites [2/n]
Here, I looked at the manoeuvre estimates/reports in 6-monthly intervals, corresponding to the reporting periods used by SpaceX. Additionally, I added a prediction to the end of 2024 based on an exponential fit through 30 April 2023. [3/n]
I've been thinking about the new proposed @FCC "five-year rule" for #SpaceDebris mitigation & wanted to share some analysis & thoughts. Whilst I think the intentions are good I believe the implications of the change are poorly understood. Let me explain... [1/n]
As @brianweeden's excellent thread explains, "The new proposed ruling would require all FCC licensed satellites that end their life in LEO to re-enter the atmosphere within 5 years, and ideally ASAP." [2/n]
Latest analysis for #Starlink & #OneWeb shows these two constellations accounted for 42% of all close approaches within 5 km predicted by #SOCRATES at the end of August, with Starlink alone accounting for 29%. [1/n]
On average, #SOCRATES predicts that each #Starlink satellite will now experience 1 close approach within 5 km with a non-Starlink object every day, and each #OneWeb satellite will experience 3.4 close approaches with a non-OneWeb object every day. These rates are increasing [2/n]
Here's the same data from [2/n] plotted with respect to the number of satellites in each constellation in orbit, clearly showing #SOCRATES predicts that #OneWeb satellites experience more close approaches (within 5 km) per satellite than the #Starlink satellites [3/n]
A follow-on from yesterday's thread with a note about averages. In a #SOCRATES report from 30 June 2022 the average collision probability for each #Starlink conjunction was 3.7E-6 but the range of values can be broad (chart shows data since 2019) [1/n]
#SOCRATES predicted some events with a collision probability > 1E-2 (1-in-100) & some with a probability < 1E-7 (1-in-10,000,000). The average value might seem to be almost negligible & you might think all conjunctions would be similar, but that's not the case [2/n]
In addition, some #Starlink & #OneWeb satellites experience more conjunctions than others. Most satellites experience relatively few encounters but a few satellites are involved in a relatively large number (charts shows data for 7 days from 30 June 2022) [3/n]
Welcome to my (delayed) monthly analysis of @CelesTrak#SOCRATES conjunctions. Since 1 March 2019, SOCRATES has predicted about 9 million unique conjunctions within 5 km involving active or derelict payloads. This is a thread focused on those involving #OneWeb & #Starlink [1/n]
#OneWeb payloads have accounted for ~500,000 unique conjunction predictions since 1 March 2019 (5.5% of all predictions made), while #Starlink payloads have accounted for ~1.1 million (12.5%) [2/n]
On 1 March 2019 #SOCRATES predicted ~3860 unique conjunctions within 5 km. On 30 June 2022 the corresponding number was ~10,160, an increase of ~160%. #Starlink accounted for ~2570 (25%) & #OneWeb accounted for ~1250 (12%) [3/n]
In advance of my monthly analysis of #Starlink conjunction data I wanted to share some additional analysis undertaken over the last few days. It's a work in progress but here's a thread looking a little deeper at the #SpaceX approach to #Starlink orbital space safety [1/n]
My focus has mostly been on understanding the implications relating to the choice of the probability threshold for collision avoidance manoeuvres. With the #SOCRATES#Starlink data now running across nearly 3 years we can gain some insights that may be useful [3/n]