Significant short-term attitude shifts
- Lowest govt approval to date
- Big rise in pessimism over last 4 weeks.
- Broad 2/3 permission for national lockdown if needed.
70% think Covid is getting worse, up from 54% last week. Hopes that the situation was improving have collapsed over last 4 weeks - from 48% to 14% since late Aug. (YouGov)
Govt approval on Covid -33 this week, from -18 last week. This is the lowest since the start @YouGov
Most Conservative voters still approve: 58% to 39% (+19)
Over 65s: 42% approve vs 55% disapproval (-13)
Under 24s: 18% vs 72% disapproval (-56)
Caution about Covid and rising pessimism about how its being handled generates broad public permission for a national lockdown if required (66%), though a much larger group (27%) are opposed than in the Spring.
So 2020 is now going to get worse before it gets better.
9% say its been a good year so far
A stoic 41% say it has been OK
On the bright side, Brexit is back!
- Brexit at its highest salience since Covid began: 51% pick as a top 3 issue with YouGov yougov.co.uk/topics/politic…
A plurality opposed the government’s position on breaching international law: polls varied between 25-49 (-24) and 33-46 (-13) with a large number of Don’t Knows.
Here 25-47 (YouGov for Best for Britain)
- Many more women (1/3) than men (1/5) in Don’t Know.
- ABC1 opposition to government was 22-53 (-31)
- C2DE opposition 28-38 (-10): narrower but against too.
That the 'OK to breach international law' polls are so very similar to the 'no deal is a good idea' polls (a stable 1/4 in support all along) offers some clear indicators as to what drives attitudes here.
Attitudes on Covid have been changing pretty incrementally. This week saw some of the biggest week-on-week shifts for a few months.
Whether a temporary coincidence of bad news stories, or sustained slump in govt approval, or shifts again with new cases/restrictions, is tbc.
Is this 'the new normal'? A major new 7 country study from @MiC_Global steps back to look at the bigger picture. (This is data from June 19th-28th in UK, June/July overall)
The British public's verdict on the UK government's handling of Covid is "incompetent, but pretty fair"
This Competence v Fairness distinction is not found in the other countries' responses.
Here is some bad news for @toadmeister and the Lockdown Sceptics; they seem especially un-influential in Britain, where people (8/10) are most likely to think the restrictions have been completely reasonable and proportional
UK ranks highest on people accepting it is our duty to follow rules (90%), but do we trust others to play their part? A big 31% gap in trust in other people. (This trust gap is incredibly wide in France – 50% - and v.narrow in Germany – 5%). [Are the media one driver here?]
Some interesting news for @togethercoalit in this comparative study. UK top for solidarity during Covid.
Over 60% of people feel the crisis has shown that most people care about each other – and have felt the support and care of others themselves. But 4/10 have felt alone.
* 54% in Britain feel worried that Covid will have a worse impact on people who belong to racial, ethnic or
religious minorities in the UK.
* Fewer people in Britain than any other country (of the 6) say they would refuse a safe and effective vaccine.
{Several studies find this}
Another nuance/paradox. UK public have highest appetite to seize the opportunity of Covid to make important changes (64%), rather than trying to return to normal - but most people doubt that will happen (55%).
So lots of interesting big picture findings in that study from More in Common. While the latest polling has some quite dramatic short-term fluctuations, that could have fairly big political implications if they stick, with next 6-8 weeks on Covid and Brexit very much in flux.
The 'fairness' point is quite striking
- furloughing a big part of that
- Maybe lockdown restrictions (fair sacrifices by all) saw more cohesion than complex/subjective arguments on social distancing and right pace of relaxing rules? (At least the first time around anyway)
Government in a good place at 40% approval, but may be quite jittery if 30% and below becomes a norm. (There may still be a crisis boost *within* the 30%)
Govt will know it needs to deliver or Starmer's approach (support aims + challenge on competence) may have broader appeal
The More in Common study is the latest of several to show UK attitudes to migration as relatively pro-migration in comparative context. The context of a pandemic has generated more short-term scepticism in Europe than in the UK
This is overall 'govt approval': its v similar to Covid approval during a pandemic.
Could this present a pragmatic political case for making a Brexit deal? Unless govt with 30% approval + 30% Covid approval wants to risk a Brexit policy [no deal] which 25% of people approve of.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a really appalling editorial error on #bbcqt
"Apparently one in three children don't speak English as a first language, why does this matter?"
Chair says "have English as a second language"
Caption changes the meaning entirely
"Don't speak fluent English"
The inaccurate and misleading caption was on screen for about 11 of the 12 minutes. Including as a woman whose first language wasn't English explained that speaking English as a second or third language doesn't mean you can't speak English
Whoever was putting up the captions did not seem to be listening to the question or the discussion. Whoever was editing the programme live did not notice this significant error in misreporting the question & broadcasting something inaccurate
Massive danger for Reform if they really are bringing back the National Front's argument from 1984 that John Barnes can't be English. Does Isabel even realise she is doing that here?
Mad for Reform to say Shabana Mahmood and David Lammy + Marcus Rashford can't be English
The Daily Mail challenged that NF racist argument - that black goals did not count, because black people can not be English - strongly in 1984. A settled question by the time Ince captained England in 1993 + had blood on his shift in 1998
Its a 90% norm (everywhere except X)
That became a 90% norm by 2019 - because of the sporting symbolism settling it by the early 1990s.
Saying Englishness was exclusive by ethnicity fell from 20% to 10% in 2010s: a bigger age divide a decade earlier, but older people shifted too by 2019 theguardian.com/society/2019/j…
Just about every single thing this headteacher states so confidently - her hunches - in this thread about public attitudes is wrong , if she only did the homework first to check what actual public attitudes are. as @jydenham of Centre for English Identity has shown
This (2012, YouGov) is the gap in perceptions of British, Scottish, Welsh, English identity - and the importance of ethnicity of being white. There was a gap in 2012, but it is much narrower than @Miss_Snuffy thinks it is & the reasons she gives don't fit the data either
@Miss_Snuffy In 2012, this was important to be white data by England. Scotland and Wales. The English data shifts when this is re-run in 2019 and 2020-21. Fewer people think what @Miss_Snuffy and her teachers (apparently on pure hunches and zero data) claim that most people think
Elon Musk supports terrorism. He objects to 7.5 years for man who created Southport Wake-Up Group, proposed mosque as the target, championed attacking the police their, **took part in the real world violence, carrying a knife**, and promoted the list of 40 targets for violence
McIntyre was fortunate that his call to kill the Home Secretary was not pursued in the charges, which include being the key organiser of the riots online and a participant in the violence against the police in person
You would obviously go to prison in America for organising and participating in riots on this scale (even if the President Elect might later pardon you if the violence had a political motive of overturning an election and trying to intimidate or hang the vice president)
It weird that @GoodwinMJ could believe the false claim there was no media coverage of grooming before 2011. He wrote a book on the BNP. The extensive media 2004 coverage of Annie Hall's Channel 4 film about grooming being rescheduled could be used to support some of his points
I hope mainstream supporters of farmers/countryside alliance will challenge effort by overt racists of the Homeland Party to associate themselves with the protest. Extreme racism of Mr Laws (who seeks to deport *all* migrants *and* Uk-born minorities) obvs not shared by farmers!
I trust many farmers would on a values basis to reject his persistent calls for Sunak, Badenoch & myself to be deported (on grounds that minorities can never be British).
Opposition from farmers to his call to remove all migrants would also reflect a practical self-interest!
I doubt the organisers can do a great deal in advance about toxic racist fringe elements choosing to turn up.
Once such an overtly racist group does seek to use it for publicity & interviews, I think it is reasonable to ssk the decent mainstream organisers to disassociate