unseen1 Profile picture
Sep 18, 2020 18 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Some data from 2016
Black voter turnout was 59.6% or 16.4 million
White voter turnout was 65.3% or ??? hard stat to find
Asian voter turnout was 49.3% or about 5 million
Hispanic voter turnout was 47.6% or 12.7 million in 2016

total votes 136,669,276
oh let's do some math
136,669,276 total votes
-12,700,000 Hispanic votes
-5,000,000 Asian votes
-16,400,000 Black votes
=102,569,275 white votes.

So basically white votes are about 73% of the vote and minority votes are about 27%
That's kind of weird, if you listen to the fake media, whites are suppose to lose the majority soon but these numbers point to it being a long time from now. Whatever, I don't concentrate on race. I'm not a believer in demographics are destiny. Just pointing it out for people
...because if you listen to the fake media you get a total different impression on the racial makeup of the country. Granted these are voting % but they follow the general demographics.

The bigger point is you shouldn't get confused between numbers and %
Since the minority populations are small compared to the majority population a % change in that group will not mean a corresponding major move in total numbers. a 1% move in say the black vote is only 164,000 votes. A 10% move would be 1.64 million. It's less for Hispanic vote.
The following data is probably a little off because they are taken from exit polls and not final numbers but I'll use them anyway because they are close enough.

Trump won the white vote in 2016 by 58% to 37%

Grandma Pickles won the non-white vote 74% to 21%
Some conclusions from all of this. The white vote remains the most important vote out there. However, the dems desperately need minority votes to make up for the white votes they lose with their racial polices. They need the vast majority of minorities to vote for them.
So any movement by minority votes towards Trump is a bad omen for the democrat party. Let's say Trump doubles his support in minority communities which from polls seems possible. Trump won 8% of the black vote (1.3 mil) and 29% (3.7 mil) of the Hispanic vote.
which if it doubles (2.6 mil and 7.4 mil) or a 5 million vote switch from 2016 or looked at in another fashion about a 4% of the total vote this would be changed.

Assuming Trump doesn't lose voters which all evidence points to at least his base staying with him
..that switch by minority voters would translate into a small but important shift in the results of the popular vote. Whether it impacts the Electoral college and down ticket races would depend on racial make up of the particular state. I doubt it would impact the South or CA but
.....it would probably impact some Northern cities and Midwestern states maybe even places like NYC or NY. Just an educated guess by me because I don't know the racial makeup of the votes enough to make a better guess.
Still on a whole, such a move would devastate the democrat party that needs the minority populations to vote for them in supermajority numbers. If the minority populations start voting like the white population and become 60/40 or 50/50 the dems will never win again.
At least, until they change their polices and outreach efforts to include more whites. This is the danger of using race as your mainstay. What happens when people's vote no longer rests on race as their biggest reason to vote? I can think of 100 reasons to vote for someone
...that has nothing to do with the race of that person. It's easy to imagine people voting for national security, jobs or law and order over their race. As far as I can see, the dems are hung by their own petard. The more they make the campaign about race the more they lose.
The minority isn't large enough to win outright they need white voters help. The more racist the dems become the less white votes they will get, but more importantly, the less minority votes they will get because most people regardless of their race are not racists.
This is why it's a good general policy to drive out the hardcore racists from your political parties on either side not embrace them. The dems, it appears, are embracing theirs and now they have less ability to draw more people of all groups into their tent.
Personally, I think the better strategy is to ignore race and concentrate on bread and butter issues that effect all groups. The economy, jobs, safety, law and order, patriotism which, it seems, has been Trump's strategy from the start and all the "polls" are now showing that
....strategy to be working as his approval in minority groups continues to increase. Instead of divide and conquer like the dems and nevertrumpers practiced for the last 30 years, Trump seems to trying out a unite and conquer approach and so far it seems to be working.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with unseen1

unseen1 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @unseen1_unseen

Feb 26
Think about this for a second. IF Trump only got his previous 240,000 votes that he received in 2016, then he would have lost. Nikki got 298,000 votes very high for an SC primary. It was almost as if some people ran the numbers and decided that ~300k votes would win.
Then Trump blew the doors off with his record-setting votes...if one was looking at it in a conspiracy minded fashion, one could possibly say that the anti-trump faction made a faulty assumption based on where they believed Trump's numbers would fall. 🤔 and instead of
...a successful ambush, they were routed. One could also look and realize that a lot of money was spent in SC to set up that ambush, and a lot of people thought it would work. This would explain all the discombobulated talking heads last night... and big donors pulling out today
Read 4 tweets
Feb 11
People ask if 2020 was rigged, what's to stop them from rigging 2024? Nothing, really. They are already doing it in plan sight with the DOJ& friendly judges, attempts to remove him from the ballot, playing with voting laws, etc. So,some lose hope. However, I look at FL Miami Dade
It was a hot bed of fraud for years until one person was removed. Now it's much better, and it only took the removal of one person and a form resolve to change it. The people doing fraud is a small% based on population. If people are resolved to make fair and free elections
...a thing, then it will happen. If they allow the tiny few to play their games, it won't. There is a lot of hope and evidence that things can be changed by the people being resolved and resolute. There is little hope and little evidence that things change when they aren't.
Read 4 tweets
May 26, 2023
The Sackett decision is a prime example of the media lying to you. It's was a 9-0 decision. That means every justice conservative, liberal, maga voted to end the reign of terror of the epa with regards to the waters of the US. All 9 did that. But if you read some of the media
...they want you to believe it was a 5-4 decision and that it was a conservative rewrite of the law. Which isn't the case. The court voted 9-0. They differed on what defines a wetland. With 4 people wanting to keep the "nexus" agreement that justice Kennedy made up out of thin..
..air in 2006. Much like the justices came up with Roe arguments to square the circle. The 5 justices rejected that argument, instead stated wetlands had to be "connected" to navigable interstate waterways to fall under federal oversight, while 4 thought the nexus argument could
Read 6 tweets
May 25, 2023
Let's leave DeSantis out of this equation. When did we as a people accept that it was okay for our leaders to lie constantly to us and then not have any consequences for those lies? Was it Clinton, and his depends on what "is" is?
Or was it before that. I remember Bush saying, "Read my lips no new taxes," then being punished for that lie by not being reelected. But that I think was the last time any major consequences happened to a politician who lied. I mean, that's fine, i guess.
...but if we have come to accept that our leaders are nothing but liars, why do we elect them knowing they are lying and will lie to us? Seems like, I don't know, not a good recipe for success or accountability. Sure, we all hear, "but that's what a politician does." However,
Read 5 tweets
May 25, 2023
Look, take this for what it is. I try not to be a person who goes around with blinders on. I support President Trump because during his four years, he did more to further the cause of Americaism than any modern president except maybe Reagan.
Did he make some mistakes? Sure. Does he bullshit a lot, sure. But on the other hand, he kept his promises to the best of his ability, fighting the good fight. He loves this country, and he doesn't want a "new world order." He wants America to be the best country and its citizens
.....to have the best standard of living we can have. He tries to put America and all its citizens first regardless of their race, gender or political leaning, and for that, he will continue to have my support. Whereas the vast majority of politicians and leaders put themselves
Read 4 tweets
Apr 22, 2023
As you celebrate Earth Day, remember that one of the co-founders of this special day killed his girlfriend and composted her in his closet. Ira Enihorn was the master of ceremonies on that first earth day back in 1970, and though he preached free love& non-violence, he killed...
.....his girlfriend in a fit of rage when she left him, stuffed her battered, beaten body into a trunk in his closet& left her to compost for 18 months. It wasn't until her composted remains leaked out of the trunk and through the ceiling of the person living in the apartment
...below that police discovered the composted body. After his arrest, he did what most good socialists do. He jumped bail, changed his name, and fled to Europe. It took 23 years before they finally got their man. Of course, the other socialists that founded Earth Day, distanced
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(