So here is a thread on testing the new #bulletproofprospect process for wide receivers.
I took the exact same procedure and applied it as though it was 2011 and then tested it on the classes from 2012-2017 to see how it worked.
Lets dive in.
First off, here were the players it identified as bulletproof+ from 2003-2011. Please remember I only use the bulletproof process on players drafted rounds 1-3.
The tier names are NOT to be taken literally. They are just fun, so relax.
Cornerstone had 28 players of which 15 hit. 54%
These are them
Maybe was 6/17 = 35%
Bust was 6/49 = 12%
This list is too long for one screen shot.
This is a more manageable way to look at it for only 1st and 2nd rounders on the bust list.
So then I took these same thresholds and same methodology and applied it to 2012-2017 classes to see if it could predict who would and wouldnt be gud at catching footballs.
Here are the Bulletproof+ WR's.
15/19 = 79%
Cornerstone had 8/19 = 42%
1/11 = 9%
Bust had 3/26 - 11.5%
Hilariously outperformed the Maybe tier, but these are extremely small samples sizes where one guy can alter things by quite a bit.
Anyway, the hit rates are fairly comparable on both sets so it seemed to do its job predicting the future to some degree. 🤷♂️
So then I went back to the full sample, re-ran the calculations and applied it to the full population and will just roll this forward each year.
Here are a few sample classes so you can see how each group fared.
This is what the 2017 class looks like:
This is the 2016 class.
This is the 2015 class.
Oof that Jaelen Strong miss.
That 2014 class was truly special.
2013 class.
2012 was a rough one. Oh-fer in the BPP tier.
2011 class.
To add a layer of context on top. I have dynasty adp data back to '07. Here are the WR hit rates by dynasty rookie draft round for WRs taken rounds 1-3 in the NFL draft from '07 to '17:
Here are a few of the 2020 class profiles based more or less on the new methods. The thresholds may have changed a bit by the time I was done, but the grades are accurate.
This was an article on Bryan Edwards using the old BPP methodology. The new one looks much less favorably on him. He is no longer Bulletproof. He was consistently inefficient in college
One of the best ways to win fantasy football championships is by rostering the RB that breaks out out of nowhere
This is a hard feat to pull off as there are approximately 3700 options
I would like to introduce you to one of the bets that you simply have to make
Sean Tucker.
From a size and athleticism perspective Sean Tucker looks the part. Per @rotounderworld in the screen shot above Tucker measured in at a fairly robust 5-9 and 207 pounds while running a 90th-percentile 4.44 40.
We like that very much.
@rotounderworld Was Sean Tucker a one-dimensional runningback in college or was he trusted in all aspects of the game?
As evidenced by his 75th-percentile college dominator and his 95th-percentile target share, it is pretty clear that the offence in Syracuse ran through Sean Tucker.
If y'all want me to say, "Voldemort has peripheral metrics that suggest that he might be better than the 10% target share and 8 fantasy ppg player that he's been" then Ill admit it.
I am in fact expecting him to have greater than 10% targets and 8 fantasy ppg this season.
There are two things at play here.
#1 - The binary notion of is he "good or evil" at football.
#2 - Regardless of #1, is he a good pick in any format?