@HorfordJ@JohnDavisJDLLM@_EpsilonAlpha In that case, I'd like to propose a business arrangement with you. You put up 100% of the capital, and you take 100% of the legal & financial responsibility. You have to run every decision by me, but I don't have to do the same. You are responsible for 100% of the labor.>
@HorfordJ@JohnDavisJDLLM@_EpsilonAlpha >I have the right to consider tasks I would do for myself whether I was in business with you or not to be my contributions to the business, even if you consider them unnecessary and a waste of time and resources. I can break the contract at any time without facing any >
@HorfordJ@JohnDavisJDLLM@_EpsilonAlpha consequences, and take half of the business plus demand regular payments from you for life when I leave. If you break the contract you are subject to penalties and also a stigma for abandoning your business partner, and I get the entire business plus regular payments from you >
@HorfordJ@JohnDavisJDLLM@_EpsilonAlpha > for life. If for any reason I am afraid I'm going to get shorted, I can accuse you of creating a hostile work environment, and even if I can't prove it to be true, that must be factored into any court's decision regarding the division of property should the contract dissolve. >
@HorfordJ@JohnDavisJDLLM@_EpsilonAlpha > If, after the contract is broken, you go into business with someone else and make more income than I am making, I can demand that your regular payments be increased to reflect your financial status and be taken seriously. Wanna sign up for that?
This is what it looks like when someone uses her own delusions of persecution to excuse her prejudices. This is no different than actual white supremacy. "I claim persecution, therefore no disadvantage you face can be acknowledged, much less addressed."
"What is a man's right that doesn't exist?"
Here's an entire list, honey. Read up. reddit.com/r/MensRights/w…
Note: Not everything on it is being treated by the MRM as a reason to pass laws & demand government money, as feminists do.
You claim men have actively taken away our rights... but your only complaint that is even CLOSE to legit is about bodily autonomy, something American males lose AT BIRTH when part of their genitals gets CUT OFF AND SOLD, then used to make women's beauty products.
@Redmoonblade Here goes. This will be a thread.
I'm not religious, but I believe a lot of recognition of human nature was written into the Bible, and much of what's called "prophesy" in it is based on that.
So with that in mind, think about the "mark of the beast" prophesy, but modern.
@Redmoonblade First modern change: It's not a prediction about a devil, but a metaphor for what people with unlimited power would do if they had the ability to "mark" everyone in society approved, or disapproved, to facilitate their control over the population.
@Redmoonblade Imagine it's not a physical mark, but a "mark of approval" by authoritarian ideologues (regressives) with influence in the banking industry. It'll be communicated through either approval or denial of electronic financial transactions.
Boiled down to its essence, with all of the buzzwords removed, and the underlying behavior exposed, feminism is about exploiting women's influence on society as a means to shake men down for cash. That's all it ever was, and that's all it ever will be.
There is no real concern for women in feminism's mainstream, established movement... much less any compassion for men. It is 100%, totally and completely, without significant exception, about money. Feminists seek more power to increase the ways they can shake men down for cash.
That's the reason behind the victim narratives, the reason behind the deliberate bias and bad methodology in their research, the reason they demonize men, and the reason they seek to dominate or eviscerate women who go off the feminist reservation.