James Doleman Profile picture
Sep 21, 2020 23 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Proceedings begin, first witness, computer scientist Professor Christian Grotthoff.
He is giving evidence on how unredacted material was placed on the internet
#Assange
The witness confirms that in August 2010 a Guardian journalist, David Leigh gained access to the files, which were strongly encrypyed, these, he said "were useless without the key."
#Assange
Grotthoff says that there were a number of attempts to interfere and hack the Wikileaks website and steal data.
#Assange
He is now going through a technical explanation of a denial of service attack works.
#Assange
Witness says led to people making copies of the website, "mirrors," so they could continue to access the data.
Court is shown a list of the ones Grothoff found, "there were lots of mirrors all over the world," he says
#Assange
Some of the, he says he said, contained the unredacted US diplomatic cables, but these would be useless without the encryption key.
#Assange
In Febuary 2011, David Leigh published the pass key in a book he wrote about WikiLeaks, they could change their own passwords but had no control over the "Mirror sites."
#Assange
In August 2011 a German newspaper published a story saying that there was a password going around the internet that could access the data, "people could now put two and two together, go over the wikileaks archive and decrypt the files.
#Assange
The unencryped files were then published online by various places, a well-known website, Cryptome, then published a searchable version of the cables
#Assange
The witness says the material is still available on Cryptome, which is based in the USA, but to his knowledge, they had never been prosecuted.
#Assange
Grothoff says that once the key was oiut there, "it would have been impossible to stop."
He ends his evidence, Joes Smith rises t cross-examine on behalf of the US Government.
Assange
Smith is asking the witness what materials he was given by the defence, he says he was pointed to some documents to assist his research, but these were all in the public domain already.
#Assange
The prosecution lawyer is now challenging the witnesses "impartiality."
He says he sees Assange as a "sympathetic character," as he exposed war crimes.
#Assange
Smith reads out a "Free Assange," open letter from 2017, says his name appears on it.
He says he doesn't recall it, "but it was possible, I sometimes sign things I find reasonable."
#Assange
Witness says that in his opinion he thinks this case is a bad precedent.

Grothoff, "Of course I have a view that this case is unfair, Smith, "You are biased, your partial," He replies, "you are wrong, you didn't do your homework to find out who published the cables.
Smith suggesting the information must have been on the public wikileaks website, the witness gives various explanation of why that might not be true.
#Assange
Prosecutor asks if Wikileaks gave the password to too many people,
Her replies "Well if you put it in a book, like David Leigh did, you give it a lot of people."
#Assange
Grothoff says that David Leigh says in his book that Assange was reluctant to hand over the full cache of cables to him, and only did so after the attacks on the website began.
#Assange
Grothoff says the best was to hide Mirror websites which contained the files, if to build thousands of mirrors which didn't have it so making the first set impossible to find, "building a haystack."
#Assange
He adds he does not know if that was a deliberate Wikileaks strategy but would be a "very smart idea."
Assange
The prosecutor is going through a timeline of an earlier release of the cables, witness says he has checked these are they are marked "unclassified."
Smith says, "Were they marked secret?"
Grothoff unclassified documents are not usually secret.
#Assange
Smith is asking about a tweet the witness mentioned, he says he does not have it to hand "but not very quickly."
Court adjours for 15 minutes while he tries to locate it.
#Assange
Smith ends his cross-examination, court breaks for 10 minuted so the defence can take instructions from Mr #Assange

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Doleman

James Doleman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jamesdoleman

Apr 25, 2023
Why did the Sun/News of the world hack William and Harry so much?
A thread.
Royal news and gossip was a staple of their output, but their problem was that, in 2006/2010 the younger members of the family, who the public was most interested wouldn't cooperate, as they blamed the press for Diana's death
Their Royal reporters were also mostly middle aged men in suits, they wouldn't exactly blend in at the London nightspots the young set hung out at
Read 7 tweets
Apr 23, 2023
Neither of the places are in England ImageImage
Keir Starmer
"I've been out and about wishing everyone in England a happy St George's day. Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 17, 2023
Sorry all, audio breaking up a bit so can't tweet this part properly
Counsel for Harry says that while the Home office may not have been formally informed they would have been aware of his offer
Says that the language used in the article that this was a "crushing rebuttal," to Harry was inflammatory language.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 17, 2023
Counsel now going over emails sent to the Mail on Sunday to Harry's solicitors asking if they wanted to "comment or guide," them on their planned article.
Counsel, Harry had only made the offer to pay when the judicial review was already in progress.
Says "That's the basis of what the criticism [in the article] was about
Read 13 tweets
Mar 17, 2023
Judge enters, as motions hearing in the case of Prince Harry v Associated Newspapers resumes
Begins by saying that the case from Harry's counsel "undermines a newspaper's right to comment."
Adds that the dismissal of the defence of "honest comment," ignores it's width
Read 15 tweets
Mar 17, 2023
Back at court (by video link) for a motions hearing in the case of Prince Harry v Associated Newspapers.
Not sure what I'll be able to report, but will let you all know what I can.
This is one of a series of similar cases, here my colleague .@danevanswrites reports on the latest on Harry V Mirror Group Newspapers
bylinetimes.com/2023/03/16/pri…
Court rises as Mr Justice Nicklin, the presiding judge, enters.
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(