Bilyana Petrova Profile picture
Sep 21, 2020 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Happy to see this paper with @thoatley published in Socio-Economic Review. Building on the literature on the exorbitant privilege, we explore the drivers of American #financialization. The US financial sector almost doubled in size between 1980 and 2005. 1/n
Few other industrial democracies witnessed a similar increase in the value added by finance. Financial intermediation did not rise everywhere. Rather, it shrank in some countries, grew moderately in others, and expanded significantly in CA, AUL, IRL, the UK, & the US. 2/n
Interestingly, this growth does not appear to be due to internal financial #deregulation. Relative to other countries, the US deregulated little bn 1980 and 2017. Yet, it experienced one of the largest increases in the size of its financial sector. What explains this puzzle? 3/n
In line with a growing literature that recognizes spatial interdependencies, anticipates distinct patterns of specialization, and discusses the global reorganization of finance, we link the expansion of fin services in the USA to fin liberalization in the rest of the world. 4/n
Fin liberalization removed many of the barriers that required fin transactions to occur within a compact geographic area, enabling fin institutions, non-fin corporations & households to conduct fin transactions over a larger area that no longer conformed to national borders. 5/n
Fin institutions reacted to this new environment by reorganizing their activity. The volume of cross-border capital flows rose significantly, reaching ~40% of global GDP by 2005. Further, fin institutions centralized fin activity globally to capture external economies. 6/n
The US fin services industry was especially likely to expand as a consequence of this global reorganization because of the US dollar’s global role. The dollar is the most heavily traded currency in foreign exchange markets. It underpins the global banking system. 7/n
The dollar’s role as a reserve and transactional currency encourages private and public entities from across the world to pool liquidity in the US money market. The large global banks that emerged from industry consolidation sharply intensified their dollar-based activities. 8/n
In sum, firms responded to national deregulation by centralizing their activities. The US dollar’s established role as the world’s reserve currency made the US system a preferred location for a growing share of this new financial activity. 9/n
Our empirical analysis supports this argument. Global fin deregulation and global capital account liberalization emerge as statistically significant predictors of US value added by finance. 10/n
In contrast, they do not appear to drive financial sector growth in other post-industrial democracies, suggesting that internal dynamics might be more relevant there. 11/n
We thank @whinecough, @Menninga, @JanaGrittersova, @m2matthijs, Herman Schwartz, Heather Ba and a number of anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bilyana Petrova

Bilyana Petrova Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bilyanakpetrova

Jun 13, 2022
How does globalization affect economic redistribution in Central and Eastern Europe?

In a new @cps_journal article, Aleksandra Sznajder Lee and I find that, despite the constraints it places on policymakers, globalization has not led to lower economic redistribution in CEE. A🧵
(Economic redistribution captures the extent to which governments reduce differences in income levels through taxes and transfers.)

Link to the article: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00…
A rich literature in political science, economics, and sociology has argued that economic integration can either spur welfare state expansion or lead to retrenchment.

The heightened risks associated w/ globalization can motivate political elites to step in and shield citizens.
Read 25 tweets
Aug 27, 2020
Happy to see this article with Evelyne Huber and John D. Stephens published in RIPE (@RIPEJournal). Focusing on 18 post-industrial democracies between 1960 and 2015, we re-examine the relationship bn #financialization and economic #inequality. (1/n) bit.ly/31xCwth
We make 3 theoretical contributions. First, we identify which aspects of fin sector growth can increase inequality. We posit the shareholder value model of corporate governance (SVM) and the financialization of non-financial firms (FNF) can exacerbate income differentials. (2/n)
SVM raises executive compensation and ensures the largest income gains accrue to the very rich. FNF increases the demand for financial professionals, generating well-paid employment opportunities for financial sector workers and resulting in higher wages in the industry. (3/n)
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(