Inventing a #COVID19 vaccine is just a first step. For it to make a material difference in the pandemic, we must also manufacture and distribute it, and people must take it (with confidence that it's safe). Let’s talk about the often-overlooked, unsexy problem of DISTRIBUTION. 1/
There are many efforts afoot using diverse biological approaches to develop a vaccine. I think it is likely one will be invented – though how safe and effective it will be, and when it will appear, are still far from certain. 2/
As discussed in #APOLLOSARROW, out on October 27 amazon.com/Apollos-Arrow-…, the many steps necessary before widespread vaccination takes place may mean it does not arrive before we reach herd immunity anyway, in 2022 or so. So a vaccine may not materially shorten the pandemic. 3/
On vaccine manufacturing efforts, note that many pharmaceutical companies, and @BillGates himself (to his great credit), have said they will build factories even before a vaccine is invented. See: businessinsider.com/bill-gates-fac… 5/
On vaccine acceptance, public interest has fluctuated – with 60-70% saying they would get a shot. See, for example: news.gallup.com/poll/317018/on…
This is not a terrible level for herd immunity, but we would need to actually reach it, and reach it fast, and the higher the better. 6/
But what about DISTRIBUTION? How will billions of doses of #COVID19 vaccine that get manufactured get from factories to our arms – especially if every dose must stay refrigerated from time of manufacture until injection? This is known as a “cold chain” sciencedirect.com/science/articl… 7/
Any interruption in the refrigeration of a vaccine that must stay refrigerated (e.g., being accidentally left for an hour on a loading dock or in a vial on a counter) can inactivate it. It requires a lot of effort to prevent such breaks in the cold chain. 8/
The necessity of monitoring the exposure of vaccines to heat during transport and storage has led to many innovations, including temperature-sensitive vaccine vial monitors and distributed internet-enabled sensors. sciencedirect.com/science/articl… 10/
There are cases where vaccines sent to developing world have been rendered useless. For example, a measles outbreak in Micronesia in 2014 was probably due to cold chain failure cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/m… and of polio in Oman in 1988 likely for same reason sciencedirect.com/science/articl… 11/
Plus, TOO COLD a temperature is also a problem! It can inactivate a vaccine. Vaccine exposure to temperatures BELOW recommended ranges occurred during shipments in 38% of studies from higher income countries and 19% in lower income countries. sciencedirect.com/science/articl… 13/
Indeed, most (if not all) of the likely #COVID19 vaccines will need some sort of cold chain (with specific tolerances for requisite cold temperature or for permissible time at room temperature). supplychaindive.com/news/coronavir…#coldchain 15/
According to @iata, by 2022, world sales of cold-chain drugs will likely top $416 billion, in a global biopharma market >$1.43 trillion. iata.org/contentassets/…
At present, perhaps 25% of vaccines reach their destination degraded because of incorrect shipping. 16/
So, indeed, many (or all!) #COVID19#SARSCOV2 vaccines will face the important and demanding challenge of requiring a #coldchain. 17/
But the problem of transporting an agent for vaccination in a way that protects its efficacy is not a new one!
Edward Jenner proved the utility of vaccination in 1798, by taking the pus from someone with cowpox (a mild disease) and injecting it into another person, so as to make them immune to the much deadlier disease of smallpox (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Je…). 19/
As discussed in #APOLLOSARROW, Jenner’s key innovation was to do a *challenge trial*: after putting cowpox pus into the arms of 8-year-old James Phipps, he later deliberately infected him with smallpox!
But how could this cascade from person-to-person be maintained for early vaccination against smallpox, two centuries ago, when there was no refrigeration? 21/
It was possible to take lymph from a person who recovered from cowpox, put it between two sealed glass plates, and ship it somewhere else for use, but it often degraded and was ineffective. There was no cold chain. 22/
An alternative was to transport the vaccine "arm-to-arm." The first person would be vaccinated by smearing vaccine onto their arm with a needle. A week later, when a cowpox pustule developed, a doctor would cut into it and transfer pus on to arm of another person. And so on. 23/
And such people could move, by ship, over a period of weeks, from, say, the UK to India, in a human chain, serving as vessels for the pathogen. 24/
The journey of the vaccine to the arm of the young Wadiyar queen in this image (on the right) probably began, in India at least, with the three-year-old daughter of a British servant named Anna Dusthall. bbc.com/news/world-asi… [thread continues] 25/
On June 14, 1802, Anna Dusthall became the first person in India to be successfully vaccinated for smallpox. Little else is known about her. But all vaccination in India began with her. The following week, five children in Bombay were vaccinated with pus from Dusthall's arm. /26
From there, the vaccine travelled, most often arm-to-arm, across India to various British bases – Hyderabad, Cochin, Tellicherry, Chingleput, Madras and eventually, to the royal court of Mysore, where it may have wound up in the arm of the young queen, Devajammani. 27/
Queen Devajammani agreed to the painting in part to help change attitudes towards vaccination among her subjects.
For scholarship on this painting, entitled Dancing Girls, Madras, c. 1805, by Irish artist Thomas Hickey, see: cambridge.org/core/services/… 28/
This action by the queen in 1805 also highlights another ongoing challenge, beyond vaccine distribution, that will be relevant to confronting COVID19: public health education. People will have to be encouraged to take a vaccine on a huge scale, and persuaded that it is safe. 29/
And this historical case highlights another broader idea, which is one theme of APOLLO’S ARROW: The Profound and Enduring Impact of Coronavirus on the Way We Live @littlebrownamazon.com/Apollos-Arrow-…: the challenges posed by epidemics have always been a part of our history. 30/
Plagues are not new to our species. They are just new to *us*. 31/
For another "human chain" of "orphan children" assigned the task of being sequentially infected with cowpox during a long ocean journey, for the purpose of transporting the vaccine against smallpox a great distance, see: outono.net/elentir/2020/0… via @CarlosHdezy 32/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In "hybrid systems" of humans and machines, how will AI (whether simple or complex) affect not just human-machine interactions, but human-human interactions in the presence of machines?
Will AI change human ethical behavior? 1/
In new work in @PNASNews, we showcase a novel cyber-physical system of people driving cars via the internet in an experimental diorama. This system allows us to explore how forms of AI affect existing human norms of cooperation and coordination. 2/ pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn…
Hiro Shirado (), @shn_kasa, and I tested how AI might affect norms of reciprocity using a novel cyber-physical lab experiment where online subjects (N=300 in 150 dyads) drove robotic vehicles remotely in a game of CHICKEN. #HNL 3/ shirado.net pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn…
If you hide people's wealth, you can make the economic gradient in happiness go away, in part by making poor people relatively happier.
New (somewhat dispiriting) experiments spearheaded by @Nishi_Akihiro in @NatMentHealth #HNL 1/ nature.com/articles/s4422…
A lot of the economic gradient in subjective well being (SWB) with respect to wealth has to do with the invidious comparisons people can make with those around them. 2/
One classic study reported that most people prefer to choose A (current yearly income is $50,000 and others earn $25,000) over B (current yearly income is $100,000 and others earn $200,000).
People would rather be relatively rich and absolutely poor!
Laundering of claims: This @CNN link () says that 2,00 children have died in Gaza recently, and attributes info to an 'aid agency,' namely @SavetheChildren, and provides an embedded link you can click to for possible independent data. But....cnn.com/2023/10/24/mid…
When you click on link, you go to an article which reports that 'at least 2,000 children killed in Gaza' (which might be true and would be awful – the situation in Gaza is horrific, for sure!): But the article provides an embedded link for its source....savethechildren.net/news/least-200…
And the source of the Save the Children article which was the source of the CNN article is this article, per its embedded link: . And that article doesn't mention 2,000 children and is info from Hamas, which cannot be deemed independent or honest.dw.com/en/israel-hama…
Fantastic letter from Dean Jenny Martinez of @Stanford@StanfordLaw defending fundamental principles of a university and addressing the wrong-headed means of protest employed by lawyers-in training at her school a few weeks ago. Bravo. law.stanford.edu/wp-content/upl…
I wish Presidents and Deans at universities had been able to forthrightly do such a thing for the past ten years.
"We cannot function as a law school from the premise that animated the disruption of Judge Duncan -- that speakers, texts, or ideas believed by some to be harmful inflict a new impermissible harm justifying a heckler’s veto simply because they are present on campus."
Super-cool @PNASNews study examines historical changes in decision-making by professional Go players from 1950 to 2021, focusing on changes in game play after the advent of superhuman AI (i.e., AlphaGo). pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.10… 1/
Human players in human-human matches began to make significantly better decisions in Go following the advent of superhuman AI. Players’ strategies across time changed to reflect more novelty (in the first 60 moves of a game). 2/
The development of superhuman AI programs may prompt human players to break away from traditional strategies and induced them to explore novel moves, which in turn may have improved their decision-making or even enjoyment of the game. 3/
It's been exactly 3 years since I pinned this thread of threads re #COVID19. The early threads prompted me to write #ApollosArrow which has stood the test of time, I think (amazon.com/Apollos-Arrow-…).
And, as forecast, the pandemic is ending. I'm unpinning the thread—on schedule.
*subject to the low-likelihood emergence of a novel strain of the virus that fully evades our vaccines or that is much deadlier. ;-)
This piece in the @WSJ (wsj.com/articles/the-l…), published on October 16, 2020, laid out the likely course of the pandemic, and we are still on track. We are now late into the "intermediate phase" and will put the pandemic fully behind us in 2024. #ApollosArrow