Inventing a #COVID19 vaccine is just a first step. For it to make a material difference in the pandemic, we must also manufacture and distribute it, and people must take it (with confidence that it's safe). Let’s talk about the often-overlooked, unsexy problem of DISTRIBUTION. 1/
There are many efforts afoot using diverse biological approaches to develop a vaccine. I think it is likely one will be invented – though how safe and effective it will be, and when it will appear, are still far from certain. 2/
As discussed in #APOLLOSARROW, out on October 27 amazon.com/Apollos-Arrow-…, the many steps necessary before widespread vaccination takes place may mean it does not arrive before we reach herd immunity anyway, in 2022 or so. So a vaccine may not materially shorten the pandemic. 3/
On vaccine manufacturing efforts, note that many pharmaceutical companies, and @BillGates himself (to his great credit), have said they will build factories even before a vaccine is invented. See: businessinsider.com/bill-gates-fac… 5/
On vaccine acceptance, public interest has fluctuated – with 60-70% saying they would get a shot. See, for example: news.gallup.com/poll/317018/on…
This is not a terrible level for herd immunity, but we would need to actually reach it, and reach it fast, and the higher the better. 6/
But what about DISTRIBUTION? How will billions of doses of #COVID19 vaccine that get manufactured get from factories to our arms – especially if every dose must stay refrigerated from time of manufacture until injection? This is known as a “cold chain” sciencedirect.com/science/articl… 7/
Any interruption in the refrigeration of a vaccine that must stay refrigerated (e.g., being accidentally left for an hour on a loading dock or in a vial on a counter) can inactivate it. It requires a lot of effort to prevent such breaks in the cold chain. 8/
The necessity of monitoring the exposure of vaccines to heat during transport and storage has led to many innovations, including temperature-sensitive vaccine vial monitors and distributed internet-enabled sensors. sciencedirect.com/science/articl… 10/
There are cases where vaccines sent to developing world have been rendered useless. For example, a measles outbreak in Micronesia in 2014 was probably due to cold chain failure cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/m… and of polio in Oman in 1988 likely for same reason sciencedirect.com/science/articl… 11/
Plus, TOO COLD a temperature is also a problem! It can inactivate a vaccine. Vaccine exposure to temperatures BELOW recommended ranges occurred during shipments in 38% of studies from higher income countries and 19% in lower income countries. sciencedirect.com/science/articl… 13/
Indeed, most (if not all) of the likely #COVID19 vaccines will need some sort of cold chain (with specific tolerances for requisite cold temperature or for permissible time at room temperature). supplychaindive.com/news/coronavir…#coldchain 15/
According to @iata, by 2022, world sales of cold-chain drugs will likely top $416 billion, in a global biopharma market >$1.43 trillion. iata.org/contentassets/…
At present, perhaps 25% of vaccines reach their destination degraded because of incorrect shipping. 16/
So, indeed, many (or all!) #COVID19#SARSCOV2 vaccines will face the important and demanding challenge of requiring a #coldchain. 17/
But the problem of transporting an agent for vaccination in a way that protects its efficacy is not a new one!
Edward Jenner proved the utility of vaccination in 1798, by taking the pus from someone with cowpox (a mild disease) and injecting it into another person, so as to make them immune to the much deadlier disease of smallpox (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Je…). 19/
As discussed in #APOLLOSARROW, Jenner’s key innovation was to do a *challenge trial*: after putting cowpox pus into the arms of 8-year-old James Phipps, he later deliberately infected him with smallpox!
But how could this cascade from person-to-person be maintained for early vaccination against smallpox, two centuries ago, when there was no refrigeration? 21/
It was possible to take lymph from a person who recovered from cowpox, put it between two sealed glass plates, and ship it somewhere else for use, but it often degraded and was ineffective. There was no cold chain. 22/
An alternative was to transport the vaccine "arm-to-arm." The first person would be vaccinated by smearing vaccine onto their arm with a needle. A week later, when a cowpox pustule developed, a doctor would cut into it and transfer pus on to arm of another person. And so on. 23/
And such people could move, by ship, over a period of weeks, from, say, the UK to India, in a human chain, serving as vessels for the pathogen. 24/
The journey of the vaccine to the arm of the young Wadiyar queen in this image (on the right) probably began, in India at least, with the three-year-old daughter of a British servant named Anna Dusthall. bbc.com/news/world-asi… [thread continues] 25/
On June 14, 1802, Anna Dusthall became the first person in India to be successfully vaccinated for smallpox. Little else is known about her. But all vaccination in India began with her. The following week, five children in Bombay were vaccinated with pus from Dusthall's arm. /26
From there, the vaccine travelled, most often arm-to-arm, across India to various British bases – Hyderabad, Cochin, Tellicherry, Chingleput, Madras and eventually, to the royal court of Mysore, where it may have wound up in the arm of the young queen, Devajammani. 27/
Queen Devajammani agreed to the painting in part to help change attitudes towards vaccination among her subjects.
For scholarship on this painting, entitled Dancing Girls, Madras, c. 1805, by Irish artist Thomas Hickey, see: cambridge.org/core/services/… 28/
This action by the queen in 1805 also highlights another ongoing challenge, beyond vaccine distribution, that will be relevant to confronting COVID19: public health education. People will have to be encouraged to take a vaccine on a huge scale, and persuaded that it is safe. 29/
And this historical case highlights another broader idea, which is one theme of APOLLO’S ARROW: The Profound and Enduring Impact of Coronavirus on the Way We Live @littlebrownamazon.com/Apollos-Arrow-…: the challenges posed by epidemics have always been a part of our history. 30/
Plagues are not new to our species. They are just new to *us*. 31/
For another "human chain" of "orphan children" assigned the task of being sequentially infected with cowpox during a long ocean journey, for the purpose of transporting the vaccine against smallpox a great distance, see: outono.net/elentir/2020/0… via @CarlosHdezy 32/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In work out in December 2024 in @SciReports, Matt Jones and I conduct experiments to study the role of leadership within factions of larger groups struggling to reach consensus on a contentious topic. 1/
For groups to reach consensus, which is a common and crucial social task, constituent individuals must share information across network ties and make concessions to others people, trading off personal versus collective interests. 2/
Leadership is also important to group performance.
Good leaders delegate tasks so the group functions as a cohesive unit; act as information clearinghouses; wield authority to bring unruly members in line; and speed up decisions by executive action. 3/
The bacteria in your gut depend on where you are in the social network.
And the microbes within us treat our social networks as the extended environment in which they thrive. They can spread from person to person.
New #HNL work out today in @Nature. 1/
"Gut microbiome strain-sharing within isolated village social networks" with @chocophlan, @JacksonPullman1, @mqdicer, @ShivkumarVs, @DrewPrinster, @adarshsingh110, RM Juárez, @eairoldi, @ilanabrito123 #HNL 2/ nature.com/articles/s4158…
This work took >6 years of my life (with maddening delays due to COVID19), but it started as a kernel of an idea left over from our 2007 paper on the spread of obesity ( ) in which we noted that social contagion and biological contagion could both occur 3/nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.105…
In new work from #HNL in @NatureComms, we explore the ability of simple AI to affect the capacity of creativity of human groups. This work continues a stream of work we inaugurated in 2017, studying “hybrid systems” of humans and machines. 1/ nature.com/articles/s4146…
The primary obstacle to finding good ideas is normally not that innovations are hard to evaluate, but rather that coming up with an original idea that pushes the boundary of available ideas is hard. This is a challenge that groups can both mitigate and amplify. Distinctly, since AI can alter group behavior, AI might also affect creativity. 2/
Innovative ideas can enhance the immediate welfare of a population and even modify the course of human evolution. However, finding such valuable ideas often involves exploring a large pool of possibilities – which can be a challenging process for both individuals and groups. 3/
Human beings have both friends and enemies, and they can track such connections. Why? It’s not hard to see why we evolved the capacity for friendship, but why do we have a capacity for animosity, and how might it shape our social networks, potentially for the better? 1/
In new work in @PNASNews, @Amir_Ghasemian and I explore “The Structure and Function of Antagonistic Ties in Village Social Networks.”
At the population level, the existence of antagonism has important implications for the overall structure and function of human groups. #HNL 2/
Just as friendship ties can impose costs (ranging from the demands our friends place on us to the risk of infection that social connections entail), antagonistic ties can offer benefits (ranging from enhancing our overall access to novel information or reducing our membership in overly siloed groups). We show how this plays out. 3/
People copy the thoughts, feelings, & actions of those to whom they are connected. Understanding social network structure & function makes it possible to use social contagion to intervene in the world to improve health, wealth, & learning.
In a large randomized controlled field trial in 24,702 people in 176 isolated villages in Honduras, published in @ScienceMagazine on May 3, 2024, we showed how social contagion can be used to improve human welfare. #HNL @eairoldi science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
To exploit social contagion, tools are needed to eficiently identify individuals who are better able to initiate cascades. To be maximally useful, such tools should be deployable without having to actually map face-to-face social network interactions. science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
I have some thoughts on this fine statement by @Yale President Peter Salovey regarding desire by some students to impose "ideological litmus test" for access to a shared Yale space.
Salovey said: “Those protestors asked individuals who wished to pass through or enter their area, which is a shared campus space, to agree with their political viewpoints. This action is unacceptable and antithetical to the very purpose of a university.”
It’s is quite right to reject this impulse, but where might students have got this sort of idea?
The background for this statement is pro-Palestinian protests and certain recent actions by some protestors.
For the removal of doubt, I wholly support the right to protest and am sympathetic both to Israel and the civilians suffering horribly in Gaza. I have no problem with the tents or public art.
But protest that stops others from using the campus crosses line into civil disobedience and is distinct from free expression.
The problem with the otherwise commendable statement by President Salovey is that the students’ impulse to have a litmus test is part of a broader pattern of such actions at Yale (violating its liberal tenets). We have procedures and bureaucracies that do just this -- which may have given the students this very idea!