A lot of people, myself included, have taken a #Covid_19 test before going to see a new group of family or friends. Practically, though, these tests can create a false sense of security bc of their high false negative rate. I'll explain in a thread: 1/x qz.com/1905604/should…
2/x Some context: In the US, there are still some local testing shortages. But bc capitalism, private companies like @LabCorp, @everly_well, and @LetsGetChecked have started offering @US_FDA emergency-use authorized at home collection kits that get shipped off to a lab.
3/x These kits are ~$120 out of pocket, but insurance can cover them. It's a swab + PCR test, looking for SARS-CoV-2 genetic material. They typically return results in a couple of days, and you don't have to leave your home.
4/x The problem is, even at their best these tests have a pretty high false negative rate. Bc of #COVID19's long incubation period—median 4-5 days, sometimes 14—if you take a test too early after being exposed, it may not have had enough time to replicate in your body.
5/x This review from @JohnsHopkins looked at the false negative rate of #COVID19 tests and found that the first day of exposure, false negative is 100%; day 4 (probs no symptoms), it's 67%. Day 8, a bit after most people show symptoms, it's 20%. acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M2…
6/x In normal times, false negatives don't affect how medicine is practiced; if someone has flu-like symptoms but tests negative for the flu, you'd assume the test was wrong. If you're a doc, you treat accordingly. If you're a friend, you stay away until they're better.
7/x In #COVID19 times, we're using testing to try to identify asymptomatic/pre-symptomatic carriers, who we know exist. That's a new use for testing; usually it shows public health officials where outbreaks are happening.
8/x If you've known that you've been exposed to someone who has #COVID19 and get a negative test result, you should assume it's wrong, @Michael_Hochman from @KECKSchool_USC told me. You should isolate for 14 days, and assume that you're an asymptomatic carrier.
9/x That said, isolation is REALLY BAD for mental health. We need to see loved ones—so if you do, go ahead and take a test. But be mindful of your exposure levels before/after, the risks of those in the group, the activities you do—stay outside when you can, wear masks if you can
10/10 There are no 0 risk situations; you and your loved ones just have to decide for yourselves what risks you're okay taking on for yourselves and others. Sadly, I have no right answer for you—but some of the right questions to ask: qz.com/1905604/should…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Alrighty health nerds (said with love), who’s ready for 9 hours of FDA’s ad comm meeting today on vaccines?
A reminder: the only thing the committee is voting on is whether to update the primary series of Covid-19 vaccines to include the updates bivalent the shots. Everything else is just discussion.
Juicy discussion, talking about the potential of annual boosters, but talk only
Another reminder: FDA itself is under no obligation to heed its advisers. They serve at the pleasure of the agency, but the agency can disagree.
I was off running around in the woods in the latter part of last week (shout out to @RagnarRelay, look at this sheer joy) but it means I didn’t get a chance to talk about the @FDATobacco’s proposed menthol cig ban with y’all — let’s give it a go:
FDA has been trying to federally ban menthol cigs for a LONG time. It officially knew, thanks to its advisory committee, that these products were disproportionately used—and therefore harming—Black Americans since 2011. But getting a ban off the ground was deeply difficult 1/x
2/x Tobacco regulation is inherently political. Menthol cigs make up 1/3 of all cig sales. Tobacco companies don't want to have to stop selling them. They're going to push their Congressional representation to dissolve a federal ban -- which has happened in the past
Before we get into the next set of big vaccine news today, let's talk about the OTHER major story that's been playing out due to the FDA: the fallout of oh-so-many market denial orders that are reshaping the vape industry 1/x: politico.com/news/2021/09/2…
2/x As of today, FDA has issued 323 MDOs, taking 1 mil + products off the market + refuse to file/accept orders for millions more. Not a single product has gotten marketing orders; most of these belong to small/med. manufacturers; big ones (like Juul) are still awaiting decisions
3/x Small vape shops are essentially decimated and angry: they're the independent stores that say their clientele are folks who've used e-cigs to stop smoking. Flavors make up >90% of sales, and many are scrambling to figure out what to do next
Years ago, I heard a scientist @UMassMedical speak about using bits of DNA to treat diseases. The work was early/not yet perfected, but I never stopped thinking about it. Now precision genetic medicine is ready for its close up. My swan song for @qz: 1/x qz.com/2005658/covid-…
2/x In a nutshell, precision genetic medicine uses bits of DNA, or more commonly kinds of RNA, to change the way our bodies interpret and use our genetic code. If we have a mistake in our DNA—like a missing or broken gene—these bits of nucleic acid can fix it.
3/x One example on almost everyone's minds are the Pfizer/BioNTech + Moderna mRNA vaccines against Covid. These vaccines tell our muscle cells to make the spike protein, which spooks our immune system into action to protect us against the real deal.
I wasn't particularly interested when I saw that some companies are making inhaled #Covid19Vaccines—esp. when there are now 13 different jabs in circulation. But when I looked into shots' shortcomings, I realized there are some serious gains to be had 1/x qz.com/1990797/future…
2/x Upper-arm shots aren't the *best* vaccine delivery method. They're fine! They're also a tried-and-true method of delivering vaccines, which is why drug companies went that route when making vaccines as fast as possible (while upholding safety standards).
3/x Shots is that require a syringe and a medical professional to deliver. Syringes are a hot commodity—and if you don't use them correctly, you may not get as many doses from the vial (ht @timmcdonnell ) qz.com/1946024/qz.com/1976718/
The fact that science is inherently political has never been more clear to me than with the quest to find SARS-CoV-2's origins. This story is just as much about China as a global power as it is about virus hunters in bat caves. 1/x qz.com/1986084/why-do…
2/x When the @WHO declared Covid-19 a pandemic, there were bigger things to worry about than the virus' specific origins. The likely answer was that it was zoonotic, jumping from animals to people. That had been the case for the last 4/5 respiratory pandemics, anyway.
3/x But as time wore on, concrete evidence of animal origins never appeared. Scientists start asking if it's possible that SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a research lab. At the moment, that possibly can't be ruled out. But then, it became political.