#SupremeCourt to hear a plea seeking extension of college admissions deadline due to delayed #compartmentexams and time to be taken for results
Petitioners aver that compartment exams by @cbseindia29 should have been cancelled like the CBSE main exams due to COVID19. But since exams are taking place, the admission deadline in colleges should be extended to give opportunity to compartment students to to apply too
The lead petitioner has impleaded University Grants Commission in the case as the court had observed that UGC would be fit to decide how college admission deadlines can be extended, if at all.
Hearing begins.
ASG Rupinder Singh Suri appears for Union of India @VTankha : Compartment exams from today till 29th. I was asked to serve a copy to Centre for a solution.
Senior Adv Tankha: If students dont get admissions then what is the use of exams
Justice Khanwilkar: exams are on, you have to appear
Tankha: UGC is before my lord. Once #CompartmentExam2020 are over, admissions should be quickly be declared so that admissions can take place
Tankha: UGC should accommodate the compartment students in the academic calendar.
Justice Khanna: you had said the admission process is over but that's not correct
Tankha: yes they have reopened. Since 2 lakhs students are appearing in compartment, they should be benefited
Justice Khanwilkar led bench has issues in hearing the counsels over #virtualhearing
Adv Apoorv Kurup for UGC: these are compartment students. admissions start and as seats are empty these students appear. UGC will declare results
Justice Khanwilkar: this is a peculiar situation and can you make some room for these students
Kurup: academic calendar is being finalised. If cbse declares results in batches the students will be accommodated if seats are vacant
Justice Khanwilkar to UGC: What is the cut off date for admissions?
Kurup: mostly end of Ocotber.
SC: then we can direct CBSE to declare results before that.
career of 2 lakh students is not a small number !
Adv Rupesh Kumar for CBSE: the papers will need to be corrected at 16 regional centres and we will need 3 to 4 weeks
SC: This is an exceptional year and you have to make some room. academic career of 2 lakh students cannot be hampered
Justice Khanwilkar: If CBSE declares results by end of October, then you can wrap up admissions by first week of November
Kurup: the academic calendar is finalised and we were to release it yesterday.
SC to UGC: Don't release the acadmeic calendar till Thursday. Let CBSE inform us and then you both coordinate. 2 lakhs students is not a small number and we have to work out a solution in this exceptional year. You need to work in tandem with CBSE.
Adv Avishkar Singhvi: we have given a list stating college admission deadlines to give you an idea
SC: We will not consider individual admission deadlines.
Case will again be taken up on September 24. CBSE and UGC to take a joint decision on declaration of results & admissions
CBSE Compartment Exams: "Academic career of 2 lakh students cannot be hampered", Supreme Court directs UGC to not release the academic calendar till Sep 24
Delhi High Court stays further investigation and proceedings in FIR lodged against Tamil Nadu MLA and Secretary of Student Wing Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), C.V.M.P. Ezhilarasan, for organising a protest challenging proposed UGC laws, at Jantar Mantar on February 6.
The matter was listed before Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani.
Senior Amit Anand Tiwari appeared for the politician. He stated that the perusal of the FIR would itself show that there is no allegation that the peaceful protest held by the petitioner and his associates caused any obstruction, annoyance or injury or risk.
Supreme Court resumes hearing the plea against Ladakh-based activist Sonam Wangchukβs detention under the NSA.
Bench: Justices Aravind Kumar and PB Varale
Notably, Wangchukβs detention was revoked by the Centre on March 14.
@Wangchuk66
While revoking Wangchukβs detention earlier this month, the Centre said the decision was taken after considering the need to foster βan environment of peace, stability, and mutual trustβ in Ladakh.
Supreme Court Bar Association flags off its first National Conference on the theme βreimagining judicial governance: strengthening institutions for democratic justiceβ.
Justice Mehta: if a true picture is provided to litigants by lawyers at the first stage the chances of mediation succeeding would increase manifold.
Justice Mehta: But the most stumbling roadblock is the government. The experience in the national Lok Adalats where we hold pre-litigation mediation sessions is sad to say the least. There is hardly a single department of this government which comes forward with a positive response.
The person who is an accused is praying for protection? You are a suspected accused. You are trying to sensationalise the issue: Uttarakhand High Court to gym owner βMohammadβ Deepak Kumar
The Court is hearing a plea filed by Kumar seeking quashing of an FIR agains him.
I have been receiving consistent threats: Kumarβs counsel
You are investigation: Court
That is a different thing: Counsel
[Day 2]: A nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court to resume hearing reference on the interpretation of βindustryβ under the Industrial Disputes Act, in the State of UP v. Jai Bir Singh batch of cases
#SupremeCourt
A nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court begins hearing reference on the interpretation of βindustryβ under the Industrial Disputes Act, in the State of UP v. Jai Bir Singh batch of cases
#SupremeCourt
Sr Adv CU Singh: There are two notifications ... Now the old industrial disputes act has been repealed.
Sr Adv Indira Jaising: Any judgment rendered by the court in interpretation of the old law will impact the new law. One side seeks reconsideration of Bangalore water supply and one side says no such reconsideration needed.
CJI: While taking a view on Bangalore water supply .. we can give a word of caution that the interpretation is for the law which used to exist
Jaising: There is an unavoidable overlap. All conclusions should be without prejudice.
AG R Venkataramani: so whether a challenge to the new law can lie when there is no such challenge before this court
AG: I have placed my written submissions and compilations for the Courtβs consideration; I will be referring in particular to Volumes 4B and 5B. The principal issue, as framed, is whether an undertaking or enterprise falls within the definition of βindustryβ under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act and what the correct legal position is. A second, distinct issue arises from the 1982 Amendment, particularly in the context of social welfare activities and governmental functions, and whether such activities fall within the expression βenterprise.β This in turn raises the question of what constitutes a βsovereign functionβ of the State and whether such functions are excluded from the ambit of Section 2(j). To address this, it is necessary to go back to the earlier reference order and the line of judgments beginning with Bangalore Water Supply.