Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 22, 2020 β€’ 16 tweets β€’ 8 min read β€’ Read on X
π‡π„π€π‘πˆππ† 𝐀𝐋𝐄𝐑𝐓: 𝐏π₯𝐞𝐚 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐨π₯π₯𝐞𝐠𝐞 𝐚𝐝𝐦𝐒𝐬𝐬𝐒𝐨𝐧𝐬 ( 𝐂𝐁𝐒𝐄 π‚π¨π§π©πšπ«π­π¦πžπ§π­ 𝐞𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐬)

#SupremeCourt to hear a plea seeking extension of college admissions deadline due to delayed #compartmentexams and time to be taken for results
Petitioners aver that compartment exams by @cbseindia29 should have been cancelled like the CBSE main exams due to COVID19. But since exams are taking place, the admission deadline in colleges should be extended to give opportunity to compartment students to to apply too
Students are appearing for the first paper of #CompartmentExam2020 today.

#cancelcompartment
#speakupfornstudentsafety
@ugc_india
@EduMinOfIndia
Justice AM Khanwilkar led bench has assembled
Hearing will start shortly

Senior Advocate Vivek Tankha to appear for one of the petitioners (a minor student)

@VTankha

@advocate_tanvi
#compartmentstudents_wantjustice
The lead petitioner has impleaded University Grants Commission in the case as the court had observed that UGC would be fit to decide how college admission deadlines can be extended, if at all.

@ugc_india
@advocate_tanvi
Hearing begins.
ASG Rupinder Singh Suri appears for Union of India
@VTankha : Compartment exams from today till 29th. I was asked to serve a copy to Centre for a solution.

#compartmentexams
#CompartmentExam2020
#SupremeCourt
Senior Adv Tankha: If students dont get admissions then what is the use of exams

Justice Khanwilkar: exams are on, you have to appear

Tankha: UGC is before my lord. Once #CompartmentExam2020 are over, admissions should be quickly be declared so that admissions can take place
Tankha: UGC should accommodate the compartment students in the academic calendar.

Justice Khanna: you had said the admission process is over but that's not correct

Tankha: yes they have reopened. Since 2 lakhs students are appearing in compartment, they should be benefited
Justice Khanwilkar led bench has issues in hearing the counsels over #virtualhearing

Adv Apoorv Kurup for UGC: these are compartment students. admissions start and as seats are empty these students appear. UGC will declare results
Justice Khanwilkar: this is a peculiar situation and can you make some room for these students

Kurup: academic calendar is being finalised. If cbse declares results in batches the students will be accommodated if seats are vacant
Justice Khanwilkar to UGC: What is the cut off date for admissions?

Kurup: mostly end of Ocotber.

SC: then we can direct CBSE to declare results before that.
career of 2 lakh students is not a small number !
Adv Rupesh Kumar for CBSE: the papers will need to be corrected at 16 regional centres and we will need 3 to 4 weeks

SC: This is an exceptional year and you have to make some room. academic career of 2 lakh students cannot be hampered
Justice Khanwilkar: If CBSE declares results by end of October, then you can wrap up admissions by first week of November

Kurup: the academic calendar is finalised and we were to release it yesterday.
SC to UGC: Don't release the acadmeic calendar till Thursday. Let CBSE inform us and then you both coordinate. 2 lakhs students is not a small number and we have to work out a solution in this exceptional year. You need to work in tandem with CBSE.
Adv Avishkar Singhvi: we have given a list stating college admission deadlines to give you an idea

SC: We will not consider individual admission deadlines.

Case will again be taken up on September 24. CBSE and UGC to take a joint decision on declaration of results & admissions
CBSE Compartment Exams: "Academic career of 2 lakh students cannot be hampered", Supreme Court directs UGC to not release the academic calendar till Sep 24

#CBSENews #CBSE #UGC
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Jul 9
Sonam Raghuvanshi case: Supreme Court to shortly hear State’s plea challenging Sonam’s bail by the Meghalaya High Court.

Bench: Justices Manoj Misra and Shree Chandrashekhar

#SonamRaghuvanshi #SupremeCourt Image
Sonam is accused for the murder of her husband Raja Raghuvanshi during their honeymoon last year. She was granted bail by a trial court, which was upheld by the High Court.

Read here: barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Hearing begins

SG Tushar Mehta: this is a very serious case. Bail was granted on the ground that grounds were not supplied but at the time of arrest there is record that they were supplied.

Court: so far as the supply of written grounds is concerned….

Mehta: it was supplied. Only objection was section 403 was written instead of section 103.

Court: we will consider this at length. We will also see if this requires to be referred to a larger bench or not. There is Bansal’s judgement and Mihir Rajesh. There’s a conflict which is arising between various coordinate bench judgements. This would require arguments.

Mehta: there is no question of conflict. Written grounds are also supplied. It is very clear. Just with one typographical error.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 3
#Breaking

Delhi High Court orders the government's Grievance Appellate Committee (GAC) to take a decision within 15 days on removing a YouTube video by Dhruv Rathee in which he allegedly said that Ram, Seeta and Krishna, consumed meat and alcohol.

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma says any disregard of court's order will be taken seriously.

@dhruv_rathee @SachdevaAmitaImage
The Court passed the order after advocate Amita Sachdeva filed a plea in the High Court. Sachdeva took offence to a video uploaded by Rathee on YouTube on March 21, 2026, titled 'Can Hindus Eat BEEF? | Kerala Story 2 EXPOSED'.
Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma appeared for the Central government today and argued that the intermediary (YouTube) should have exercised due diligence, which is to take down the content.

Sharma said that the content uploaded by Rathee is harmful and fissiparous.

"Either Google says they will do it [take down the video] now or my ladyship may pass a judgement based on what the Division Bench has said... He [Google's counsel] should take it down and say he will not permit the such fissiparious content that hurts the sentiments of the majority community," Sharma added.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 3
Supreme Court to hear plea filed by the State of Meghalaya challenging a Meghalaya High Court order that upheld bail granted to Sonam Raghuvanshi, the prime accused in the murder of her husband Raja Raghuvanshi during their honeymoon in the state #SupremeCourt Image
SG Tushar Mehta: This is shocking. Shocking.
SG: I will just show four pages. Both of them go to Meghalaya for honeymoon. It's a pre determined murder. Wife takes husband to some hilly area.. participates in assault ..he was killed and then dead body was thrown into the gorge. Three assailants brought by the lady and she herself killed him. She was arrested from UP after she absconded. Magistrate says he was satisfied that grounds of arrest was communicated.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 2
Delhi High Court will shortly hear a defamation case filed by journalist Anjana Om Kashyap against Khan Sir and several others for calling her and Aaj Tak β€œbikau patrakar,” β€œchatukar,” β€œdalli,” and accusing them of engaging in β€œdalaali” and operating a β€œfake news ki dukaan.”

@anjanaomkashyap #KhanSirImage
Justice Tushar Rao Gedela to hear the matter.
Matter taken up.

Adv Hrishikesh Baruah appears for Kashyap.

Khan sir's lawyer says he has filed vakalatnama.
Read 12 tweets
Jun 22
[Arvind Malhotra vs High court of Himachal Pradesh]

Sr Adv Balbir Singh: My reply on 25.9.2025 was made and the recommendation was made on 23.9.2025. Collegium recommendation says two vacancies were there for promotee judges . 2 juniors were recommeded. I was interacted with on 19.9 and recommendation on 23.9 without having my reply.

Justice BV Nagarathna: These are matters where on judicial side we cannot say disclose this and disclose that. Merely because you are a senior does not mean you will be recommeded. Once collegium discusses, we cannot intervene. There is secrecg involved also... There is no rejection of your candidature. We don't know what does your recommendation say. It is about subjectice satisfaction of HC collegium ..can supreme court on judicial side ask them look into this and look into that. If this happens then where are we heading ?

Justice Joymalya Bagchi: We would have understood if HC collegium went against sc order etc. but this decision of HC has gone further and has been accepted by the supreme court.Image
Justice Nagarathna: We cannot ask the collegium of HC to disclose any reasons etc.

Singh: But after my representation the supreme court had asked the HC to reconsider the petitioner

Justice Nagarathna: How can you say reconsideration is not done?

Justice Bagchi: Screening committee gives it to the recommendation body. Now you cannot challenge screening committee order.

Justice Nagarathna: There is no cause of action. In Karnataka, for 3 vacancies, 9 are called.. 3 are selected. So others cannot adopt this mode and manner..
Justice Nagarathna: There is no procedural flaw in this as of now. Even you don't know if the name is dropped, removed, etc.

Justice Bagchi: Supreme court collegium endorsed and accepted HC recommendation. Now we cannot open this in judicial review.

Justice Nagarathna: If it has been deferred.. there is a chance the name shall be reconsidered..
Read 6 tweets
Jun 19
Supreme Court hears the plea concerning lack of ladies bar rooms across court buildings in India

CJI Surya Kant: I have constituted an All India Judicial Infrastructure committee.

Adv: In Mathura, the ladies bar room is locked. Same situation is in Ghaziabad. 60 percent of courts should have ladies bar room immediately.

CJI: the young lawyer corpus funds is also important.Image
CJI: the issues raised here touch upon larger questions of inclusiveness and long term sustainability of women lawyers in the legal profession. The petitioners have cited lack of ladies bar rooms and other facilities across High court , district court and other court buildings.
CJI: A young advocate corpus fund has been suggested to be formed with the aim that legal profession remains accessible to all. The petitioners have placed on report results of a survey undertaken by them in a structured format. The survey was circulated among women advocates across courts and information was collected from numerous district and taluka courts. The data reveals that in majority of court complexes, either no ladies bar room exists or facilities given is wholly inadequate and other facilities such as washrooms, nursing facilities, creches etc are not available.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(