"These are some of the most important clinical trials in history, affecting a vast majority of the planet’s population. It’s hard to imagine how much higher the stakes can be to get this right. Cutting corners should not be an option." 1/ nytimes.com/2020/09/22/opi… @nytopinion
The primary endpoint in these trials— infections—will likely be mostly mild. For example, in the @pfizer trial, a sore throat and a + PCR test counts as an event. Are these the infections that we want to suppress with a vaccine? Is that a good proxy of effectiveness? 2/
There are interim analyses, some w/ stopping rules during the trials
—4 looks for Pfizer, 1st is at 32 events
—2 looks for Moderna, 1 look in Astra Zeneca (US) trial
—A trial could be stopped on the basis of very limited number and severity of such events, declaring efficacy 3/
"Giving a vaccine to hundreds of millions of healthy people based on such limited data requires a real leap of faith."
Each trial has 30K-44,000 participants.
There's a difference of fulfilling a statistical endpoint vs extrapolation to the masses. Compelling evidence req'd 4/
Compelling evidence would be to power the trials on moderate to severe covid illness, which is a secondary endpoint of the trials. That adjustment to the 1° endpoint could easily be made by an amendment to the protocols. 5/
It is worth taking the extra weeks to get this right—to ice it—so that we have unequivocal proof of efficacy and a longer temporal window into safety.
Further, it is essential these trial go to completion of the 150-164 events. 6/
Any shortcuts to "declare a winner" (which has major ramifications👇) would be based on a soft endpoint and incomplete ascertainment of safety and efficacy. There should be no emergency approval (EUA) by @US_FDA until a/the trial(s) are completed 7/
We are well aware of the company & political interests to obtain an EUA ASAP. And that @HHSgov can override FDA.
It will take all of us to stand up for proper completion of the trials, avoiding shortcuts, getting this right. This will promote public trust, which is critical. 8/
Physical activity and the reduction of all-cause mortality, from 2 very large prospective cohorts 1. The relationship is non-linear, suggesting a threshold effect for many types of exercise as seen below
2. Engaging in > 1 type of physical activity was generally correlated with better outcomes compared with 1 type (T1,2,3)
People age 70+ should not be taking aspirin at any dose for prevention. Results of randomized trials show higher risk of all-cause mortality, major bleeding events and deaths from cancer. p 153, SUPER AGERS book
President Trump takes 325 mg aspirin/day. The randomized trials tested 75-81 mg/day. His doctors recommended low-dose aspirin for heart event prevention. That recommendation is ill-founded based upon best evidence in older individuals. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10… academic.oup.com/eurheartj/arti…
As I wrote in SUPER AGERS, the immune system is the key to modulating our aging process and the opportunity to extend healthspan. Today @NatureAging 7 new articles, summarized here, that reinforce its central role nature.com/articles/s4358…
The new special issue @ScienceMagazine features Immunity with 4 outstanding review papers, 5★
Our immune system over the lifespan, sex differences, influence on physiology, and host antiviral defenses science.org/toc/science/cu…
We've learned a lot more about the principal drivers of age-related diseases in the past few weeks. And that leads to a unified model to pull it all together. (open-access)
I review 4 new reports, summarized here: 1. The proteins from senescent cells predict age-related clinical outcomes 2. A new epigenetic age clock connects the dots between aging, the immune system, inflammation and lifestyle factors 3. People with a fast pace of aging had an increased risk of cognitive impairment, age-related diseases, disability, and mortality 4. The Importance of “Immune Resilience” for Healthspan
And present a unified I/I model for what we now know
Most people haven’t heard of this test, which is available in the US. It accurately predicts Alzheimer’s (not just if there’s a risk, but when). It is favorably affected by exercise and likely many other lifestyle factors.
Here’s (almost) everything we know about it. In Ground Truths (link in my profile d/t X-suppression)